| Literature DB >> 32727017 |
Tomasz Zięba1, Dominika Solińska1, Małgorzata Kapelko-Żeberska1, Artur Gryszkin1, Jurislav Babić2, Đurđica Ačkar2, Francisca Hernández3, Ante Lončarić2, Domagoj Šubarić4, Antun Jozinović2.
Abstract
This study aimed to produce starch esters by roasting potato starch with apple distillery wastewater at various temperatures and aimed to determine the effects of esterification conditions on selected properties of the modified preparations. Apple distillery wastewater was concentrated, mixed with starch (30 g of dry matter per 100 g of starch), dried, and roasted at temperatures of 110, 130 or 150 °C for 3 h. The resulting preparations were rinsed 30 times with a 60% ethanol solution, dried, and disintegrated. After that, the following analyses were performed: content of substituted acids (after alkaline de-esterification) with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC); thermal characteristics with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); swelling power and solubility in water at 80 °C; color changes with a colorimeter; rheology of the pastes based on the plotted flow curves; and the pastes' resistance to amyloglucosidase. Starch treatments with apple distillery wastewater at 130 and 150 °C caused significant changes to its properties when compared to the control samples of native starch and starch roasted without wastewater, including: a lower temperature and heat of pasting, lower swelling power and solubility in water, darker color, higher resistance to amyloglucosidase, and the formation of pastes with a lower viscosity.Entities:
Keywords: apple distillery wastewater; esterification; potato starch; properties; roasting
Year: 2020 PMID: 32727017 PMCID: PMC7465239 DOI: 10.3390/polym12081668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Mechanism of starch esterification by malic acid.
Figure 2Degree of substitution determined in the modified starch preparations roasted with apple distillery wastewater. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate that the values are significantly different at p < 0.05. RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Figure 3Solubility in water determined in the native and modified starch preparations. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate that the values are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Figure 4Swelling power determined in the native modified starch preparations. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate that the values are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Parameters of the phase transition of the native and modified starch preparations determined from thermal characteristics (DSC).
| Sample | Initial Temperature [°C] | End Temperature [°C] | Heat of Transition [J/g] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 56.93 ± 0.03 f | 69.27 ± 0.02 c | 13.26 ± 0.41 a, b | |
|
|
| 55.61 ± 0.20 e | 68.13 ± 0.39 b | 12.14 ± 0.21 a |
|
| 54.58 ± 0.09 d | 67.39 ± 0.16 a, b | 12.81 ± 0.52 a, b | |
|
| 54.29 ± 0.27 c | 67.88 ± 0.52 b | 13.56 ± 1.34 b | |
|
|
| 59.00 ± 0.10 g | 70.66 ± 0.36 d | 12.10 ± 0.21 a |
|
| 51.97 ± 0.06 a | 66.84 ± 0.29 a | 12.44 ± 0.55 a, b | |
|
| 53.56 ± 0.15 b | 67.52 ± 0.66 a, b | 12.77 ± 0.29 a, b | |
The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Values with different letters (a–f) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Figure 5Flow curves of the native and modified starch preparations. The results are expressed as the mean (n = 3). R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Parameters of Ostwald’s and Casson’s model describing the flow curves of the native and modified starch preparations.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 4.1889 ± 0.0270 e | 0.6397 ± 0.0016 d | 0.9835 ± 0.0012 a | |
|
|
| 3.9073 ± 0.3026 d | 0.6122 ± 0.0120 c | 0.9998 ± 0.0001 d |
|
| 1.2867 ± 0.0350 b | 0.5948 ± 0.0017 b | 0.9996 ± 0.0001 c, d | |
|
| 1.8697 ± 0.0586 c | 0.5731 ± 0.0014 a | 0.9993 ± 0.0001 c, d | |
|
|
| 3.8730 ± 0.0324 d | 0.6351 ± 0.0007 d | 0.9987 ± 0.0001 c |
|
| 0.0051 ± 0.0003 a | 1.1770 ± 0.0030 e | 0.9974 ± 0.0005 b | |
|
| 0.0031 ± 0.0000 a | 1.3170 ± 0.0000 f | 0.9997 ± 0.0000 d | |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 11.0167 ± 0.1815 c | 0.2190 ± 0.0041 c | 0.9872 ± 0.0049 a | |
|
|
| 10.4920 ± 0.8342 c | 0.2254 ± 0.0072 c | 0.9986 ± 0.0005 b |
|
| 3.5380 ± 0.1047 a | 0.0640 ± 0.0011 a | 0.9992 ± 0.0001 b | |
|
| 5.1363 ± 0.1609 b | 0.0777 ± 0.0019 b | 0.9993 ± 0.0001 b | |
|
|
| 10.7533 ± 0.1102 c | 0.2634 ± 0.0029 d | 0.9998 ± 0.0000 b |
|
| n. d. | n. d. | n. d. | |
|
| n. d. | n. d. | n. d. | |
n. d.—not detected; The results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with different letters (a–f) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Figure 6Resistance to amyloglucosidase determined in the native and modified starch preparations. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate that the values are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.
Color differences determined in the modified starch preparations.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | ΔE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 97.13 ± 0.02 g | −0.24 ± 0.04 c | 1.58 ± 0.07 a | - | |
|
|
| 96.13 ± 0.02 f | −0.27 ± 0.03 b, c | 1.85 ± 0.03 b | 1.04 ± 0.01 a |
|
| 96.09 ± 0.02 e | −0.32 ± 0.04 b | 2.00 ± 0.05 c | 1.13 ± 0.03 b | |
|
| 95.68 ± 0.02 d | −0.43 ± 0.03 a | 3.60 ± 0.04 d | 2.49 ± 0.02 c | |
|
|
| 88.58 ± 0.03 c | 1.75 ± 0.05 d | 9.31 ± 0.04 e | 11.70 ± 0.00 d |
|
| 72.33 ± 0.04 a | 5.02 ± 0.05 f | 15.59 ± 0.04 g | 28.97 ± 0.06 f | |
|
| 74.95 ± 0.01 b | 4.55 ± 0.02 e | 15.16 ± 0.03 f | 26.44 ± 0.01 e | |
The results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Values with different letters (a–g) in the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05. R—roasted starch without wastewater; RW—roasted starch with wastewater.