| Literature DB >> 32726976 |
Jean Claude Asseko Ondo1, Eloi Jean Jacques Blampain1, Gaston N'Tchayi Mbourou1, Stephan Mc Murtry2, Sami Hage-Ali2, Omar Elmazria2.
Abstract
In this work, we present a two-dimensional Finite Element Method (2D-FEM) model implemented on a commercial software, COMSOL Multiphysics, that is used to predict the high temperature behavior of surface acoustic wave sensors based on layered structures. The model was validated by using a comparative study between experimental and simulated results. Here, surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors consist in one-port synchronous resonators, based on the Pt/AlN/Sapphire structure and operating in the 2.45-GHz Industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band. Experimental characterizations were carried out using a specific probe station that can perform calibrated measurements from room temperature to 500 °C. In our model, we consider a pre-validated set of physical constants of AlN and Sapphire and we take into account the existence of propagation losses in the studied structure. Our results show a very good agreement between the simulation and experiments in the full range of investigated temperatures, and for all key parameters of the SAW sensor such as insertion losses, resonance frequency, electromechanical factor of the structure (k2) and quality factor (Q). Our study shows that k2 increases with the temperature, while Q decreases. The resonance frequency variation with temperature shows a good linearity, which is very useful for temperature sensing applications. The measured value of the temperature coefficient of frequency (TCF) is equal to -38.6 ppm/°C, which is consistent with the numerical predictions.Entities:
Keywords: AlN; FEM modeling; SAW sensor; high temperature; piezoelectric; sapphire
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726976 PMCID: PMC7435589 DOI: 10.3390/s20154166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Two-dimensional one-period representation of Pt/AlN/Sapphire structure.
Sizing of Pt/AlN/Sapphire structure.
| Parameters | Settings |
|---|---|
| Wavelength (2p) | 1.7 µm |
| Platinum electrode thickness | 90 nm |
| Tantalum adhesion layer | 10 nm |
| Metallization ratio | 1/2 |
| Aperture (W) | 30 µm |
| Thickness of AlN c-axis layer | 1 µm |
| Thickness of substrate c-axis | 50 µm |
Physical constants of AlN, Sapphire and Platinum.
| Material | Symbol | AlN [ | Sapphire [ | Platinum [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m3) |
| 3260 | 3980 | 21,450 |
| Elastic constants |
| 345 | 497 | 348.0 |
|
| 125 | 164 | 241.74 | |
|
| 120 | 111 | - | |
|
| - | −23.5 | - | |
|
| 395 | 498 | - | |
|
| 118 | 147 | - | |
| Piezoelectric constants |
| −0.48 | - | - |
|
| −0.58 | - | - | |
|
| 1.55 | - | - | |
| Dielectric constants |
| 8.2 | 2.25 | - |
|
| 9.5 | 10.2 | - |
First order temperature coefficient values of physical constants of AlN and Sapphire.
| Material | Symbol | AlN [ | Sapphire [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density temperature |
| −14.69 | - |
| Temperature coefficient of elastic constants |
| 0.8 | −0.75 |
|
| 1.8 | 0.4 | |
|
| 1.6 | −0.8 | |
|
| - | −0.7 | |
|
| 1 | −0.85 | |
|
| 0.5 | −1.8 | |
| Temperature coefficient of piezoelectric constants |
| - | 0 |
|
| - | 0 | |
|
| - | 0 | |
| Temperature coefficient of dielectric constants |
| - | - |
|
| - | - | |
| Thermal expansion Coefficients (ppm/°C) |
| 5.2 | 7.2 |
|
| 4.15 | 8.11 |
Boundary conditions.
| Boundary | Mechanical Boundary | Electrical Boundary | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Free | Zero electrical charge | |
|
| Free | Continuity | |
|
| Fixed Ground | ||
|
| Periodical boundary |
Figure 2(a): Measured reflection coefficient of the Pt/AlN/Sapphire sensor at 23 °C, (b): evolution of the reflection coefficient as a function of the temperature.
Figure 3Rayleigh wave mapping of the first two symmetrical (a) and antisymmetric (b) modes of 23 °C simulated Pt/AlN/Sapphire structure.
Figure 4Comparison of the simulated and experimental impedance moduli at 23 °C.
Figure 5Variations in impedance as a function of temperature: (a) simulation (b) measurement.
Figure 6Variation in Rayleigh velocity as a function of temperature.
Figure 7Evolution of experimental and simulated electromechanical coefficients versus temperature.
Figure 8Evolution of the quality factor Q as a function of temperature for experimental and simulated devices, for resonance and anti-resonance frequencies.
Figure 9Relative evolution of the resonant frequency as a function of temperature.
Figure 10Evolution of mechanical displacements as a function of the temperature obtained by simulation.