| Literature DB >> 32726931 |
Milton Fabricio Pérez-Gutiérrez1, Juan José Sánchez-Muñoz2, Mayra Erazo-Rodas1, Alicia Guerrero-Curieses3, Estrella Everss3, Aurelio Quesada-Dorador4, Ricardo Ruiz-Granell5, Alicia Ibáñez-Criado6, Alex Bellver-Navarro7, José Luis Rojo-Álvarez3, Arcadi García-Alberola2.
Abstract
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) signals are characterized by highly volatile and erratic electrical impulses, the analysis of which is difficult given the complex behavior of the heart rhythms in the left (LV) and right ventricles (RV), as sometimes shown in intracardiac recorded Electrograms (EGM). However, there are few studies that analyze VF in humans according to the simultaneous behavior of heart signals in the two ventricles. The objective of this work was to perform a spectral and a non-linear analysis of the recordings of 22 patients with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and clinical indication for a cardiac resynchronization device, simultaneously obtained in LV and RV during induced VF in patients with a Biventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (BICD) Contak Renewal IVTM (Boston Sci.). The Fourier Transform was used to identify the spectral content of the first six seconds of signals recorded in the RV and LV simultaneously. In addition, measurements that were based on Information Theory were scrutinized, including Entropy and Mutual Information. The results showed that in most patients the spectral envelopes of the EGM sources of RV and LV were complex, different, and with several frequency peaks. In addition, the Dominant Frequency (DF) in the LV was higher than in the RV, while the Organization Index (OI) had the opposite trend. The entropy measurements were more regular in the RV than in the LV, thus supporting the spectral findings. We can conclude that basic stochastic processing techniques should be scrutinized with caution and from basic to elaborated techniques, but they can provide us with useful information on the biosignals from both ventricles during VF.Entities:
Keywords: Rotor Theory; entropy; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; mutual information; spectral analysis; ventricular fibrillation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726931 PMCID: PMC7435921 DOI: 10.3390/s20154162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Example of ECG signals during normal heart rhythm (left) and during VF (right).
Figure 2CRT-D device inserted into the ventricles of the heart (left) and connections in the device (right).
Figure 3Example of recorded and stored EGM.
Figure 4Example of EGM parameters in the frequency domain. (a) Monopolar and bipolar EGMs in the time domain. (b) Spectrum parameters in a typical monopolar recording. (b) Spectrum parameters in a typical bipolar recording. (c) The OI is obtained by the ratio between the power in the bandwidth of the harmonic peaks in the B band (2–30 Hz), and the total power in the band.
Spectral parameters for the two analyzed time periods in the VF episodes.
| Parameter | Time Period: 0–3 s | Time Period: 3–6 s | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | RV |
| LV | RV |
| |
| 4.74 ± 0.62 | 4.74 ± 0.43 | ns | 4.83 ± 0.64 | 4.83 ± 0.47 | ns | |
| DF (HZ) | 19.72 ± 4.90 | 15.69 ± 3.37 | 0.004 | 20.45 ± 4.79 | 15.66 ± 4.99 | 0.006 |
| 22.45 ± 4.92 | 22.45 ± 3.70 | <0.001 | 25.97 ± 4.01 | 22.25 ± 3.45 | 0.001 | |
|
| 0.54 ± 0.56 | 0.53 ± 0.66 | ns | 0.62 ± 0.50 | 0.57 ± 0.44 | ns |
|
| 5.60 ± 2.62 | 8.27 ± 2.66 | <0.001 | 6.06 ± 2.26 | 7.70 ± 2.69 | 0.022 |
|
| 1.95 ± 2.09 | 4.10 ± 2.00 | <0.001 | 2.14 ± 1.98 | 5.01 ± 3.31 | 0.002 |
|
| 4.29 ± 3.11 | 7.67 ± 3.09 | 0.002 | 4.42±2.79 | 6.29 ± 3.05 | 0.02 |
|
| 4.04 ± 1.61 | 5.78 ± 1.88 | 0.002 | 4.66 ± 1.90 | 5.08 ± 2.06 | ns |
|
| 3.39 ± 1.39 | 3.44 ± 1.42 | ns | 4.11 ± 1.61 | 3.66 ± 1.99 | ns |
| 1.20 ± 0.73 | 1.02 ± 0.39 | ns | 1.27 ± 1.21 | 2.33 ± 5.90 | ns | |
| 0.95 ± 0.16 | 0.87 ± 0.11 | ns | 0.93 ± 0.15 | 0.90 ± 0.11 | ns | |
| OI | 0.45 ± 0.10 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.003 | 0.48 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | ns |
| LK | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | <0.001 | 0.85 ± 0.06 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.011 |
Figure 5Example of EGM in RV and LV, in the time and frequency domains. (a) EGM simultaneously recorded in RV and LV. (b) Their corresponding spectra normalized to unit area.
Figure 6Example of entropy, joint entropy, and MI estimation in synthetic data signals. (a) Estimated entropy for the first random process. (b) Estimated entropy for the second random process. (c) Estimated joint entropy between both processes. (d) Estimated MI for the presented example.
Figure 7Entropy, Joint Entropy, and MI estimation in cardiac signals. (a) Entropy for signals from the LV. (b) Entropy for signals from the RV. (c) Joint entropy for signals from LV and from RV in each patient. (d) MI for signals from LV and RV.
Figure 8Estimated MI for cardiac signals in patient database for different bin widths.
Figure 9Measurements from Information Theory for cardiac signals in the patient database, using . (a) Estimated Entropy for LV and RV, and their Joint Entropy. (b) Estimated MI.