| Literature DB >> 32726906 |
SeEun Choe1, Jihye Shin1, Ki-Sun Kim1, Sok Song1, Ra Mi Cha1, Byung-Il Jung2, Bang-Hun Hyun1, Bong-Kyun Park1,3, Dong-Jun An1.
Abstract
Here, we investigated the protective efficacy provided by passive immunity induced by a classical swine fever (Flc-LOM-BErns) vaccine with the newly developed DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) function. Ten pigs (aged 40-60 days) with maternally derived antibodies (MDAs) obtained from sows inoculated with the Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine were challenged with virulent classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Pigs with an MDA titer of 6 log2 induced by the Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine were fully protected against virulent CSFV challenge but not the pigs with an MDA titer under 5 log2. In addition, Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine-derived MDAs successfully differentiated vaccinated pigs by bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) Erns/CSFV Erns antibody detection, functioning as a DIVA.Entities:
Keywords: CSFV; DIVA; Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine; MDA
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726906 PMCID: PMC7459659 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9080608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Viral copy number of pigs with maternally derived antibodies (MDA) from sows vaccinated with the Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine after challenge. CSFV: classical swine fever virus.
| Group a | Sub | Pig ID | MDA (log2) of Pigs b | Pig Age c | RNA Copy Number (log10) from Samples (Blood/Nasal/Feces) on Different Days Post-CSFV Inoculation (dpi) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 21 | |||||
| Flc-LOM-BErns | V1 | 1 |
| 42 | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- |
| 2 |
| 42 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 2.1/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | ||
| 3 |
| 40 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 1.5/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | ||
| V2 | 4 |
| 40 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 1.2/-/- | 2.3/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | |
| 5 |
| 46 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 2.3/-/- | 1.0/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | -/-/- | ||
| 6 |
| 46 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 2.5/-/- | 2.8/-/1.5 | 2.4/1.8/- | 2.1/-/- | 2.3/1.7/- | ||
| V3 | 7 |
| 53 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 2.5/1.8/2.1 | 3.1/3.7/- | 4.3/1.5/2.3 | 3.5/-/2.5 | 3.8/2.6/3.1 | |
| 8 |
| 53 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 3.5/2.1/- | 4.1/3.2/4.4 | 5.3/2.5/2.9 | 4.5/3.3/3.1 | D | ||
| V4 | 9 | ≤3 | 60 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 4.4/2.9/1.6 | 5.7/3.5/4.2 | 3.8/2.7/2.6 | D | ||
| 10 | ≤3 | 60 | -/-/- | -/-/- | 3.5/-/2.8 | 5.2/3.3/3.7 | 4.6/3.4/2.9 | 3.2/3.6/3.4 | D | ||
| Unvaccinated | Mock | 1 | ≤3 | 48 | -/-/- | 2.6/2.1/1.5 | 5.1/3.4/3.6 | 4.4/3.6/3.2 | 4.5/3.3/3.8 | D | |
| 2 | ≤3 | 48 | -/-/- | 3.4/-/2.7 | 4.2/2.4/3.8 | 5.5/3.8/3.1 | 5.1/3.1/2.4 | 3.7/4.2/2.5 | D | ||
| 3 | ≤3 | 55 | -/-/- | 2.9/2.4/- | 4.4/3.4/2.2 | 4.6/3.7/3.6 | 5.3/2.6/3.4 | D | |||
| 4 | ≤3 | 55 | -/-/- | 3.6/2.4/2.7 | 4.7/2.5/4.2 | 5.3/2.4/3.7 | D | ||||
| 5 | ≤3 | 55 | -/-/- | 2.8/3.2/2.5 | 3.4/3.7/2.5 | 5.4/4.2/3.5 | 4.7/4.4/2.8 | D | |||
Two groups of pigs (aged 40–60 days) receiving MDAs from sows immunized (or not) with Flc-LOM-BErns were challenged with virulent CSFV. Then, pigs were divided into subgroups based on their maternally derived antibody levels at the day of challenge: V1 (6 log2 MDA), V2 (5 log2 MDA), V3 (4 log2 MDA), V4 (3 ≤ log2 MDA), and Mock (3≤ log2 MDA). MDA(log2) of pigs: MDA of pigs on the day of challenge. Positive and negative MDA of pigs on the day of challenge were marked with bold and normal letters, respectively. Threshold for positive and negative by the serum neutralization antibody test were set to 3 log2. Pig age: pig age on the day of challenge, D: dead, and -: no detection.
Figure 1Titers of maternally derive antibodies at the time of challenge and mean clinical signs upon CSFV infection. Pigs acquired passive immunity from sows inoculated with the Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine. Other pigs received MDA from sows not inoculated with the Flc-LOM-BErns vaccine (Mock). Maternally derived antibody titers are denoted by light gray bars, and the average clinical scores during the experimental period are marked by black bars.
Figure 2Leucocyte counts post-CSFV infection. Leucocytes from pigs with MDA titers of 6 (V1), 5 (V2), 4 (V3), and 3 ≤ (V4) log2 or mock controls are denoted by rectangles (red), triangles (blue), stars (green), diamonds (gray), and circles (black), respectively.
Figure 3Rectal temperature and maternally derived antibody titers post-CSFV infection. Rectal temperature of pigs with MDA titers of 6 (V1), 5 (V2), 4 (V3), and 3 ≤ (V4) log2 and of mock control pigs are marked by rectangles (red), triangles (blue), stars (green), diamonds (gray), and circles (black), respectively.
CSFV viral copy number in different organs from pigs challenged with CSFV, as detected by qRT-PCR.
| Group | Sub | Pig ID | MDA (log 2) of Pigs | Pig Age a | RNA Copy Number (log 10) from Organ Samples on the Necropsy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To b | Lu | He | Li | Ki | Il | Ce | Sp | ML | LN | Br | |||||
| Flc-LOM-BErns | V1 | 1 | 6 | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| V2 | 4 | 5 | 40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2.2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| 2.5 | - | - | - | 2.9 | - | - | 2.1 | - | - | - | |||||
| V3 | 7 | 4 | 53 | 3.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 | - | |
| 2.7 | - | - | - | 2.6 | - | 2.1 | - | - | 1.5 | - | |||||
| V4 | 9 | ≤3 | 60 | 3.6 | - | 2.7 | - | 3.5 | - | - | - | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.4 | |
| 2.9 | 2.8 | - | - | 4.2 | - | - | 2.5 | 4.2 | 3.7 | - | |||||
| Unvaccinated | Mock | 1 | ≤3 | 48 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 3.4 | - | - | 4.2 | - | 4.1 | 2.9 |
| 4.6 | 2.8 | 1.4 | - | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| - | - | - | - | 2.1 | - | 3.5 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 3.2 | - | |||||
| 5.3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4.6 | 3.8 | - | 3.2 | |||||
| 2.9 | 4.2 | - | - | 3.3 | - | - | 4.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | - | |||||
aAge: pig age on the day of challenge. bTo, tonsil; Lu, lung; He, heart; Li, liver; Ki, kidney; Il, ileum; Ce, cecum; Sp, spleen; ML, mesenteric lymph node; LN, inguinal lymph node; Br, brain.
Comparison of MDA, CSFV Erns, and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) Erns antibody titers before CSFV inoculation and at the time of necropsy after challenge.
| Group | Subgroup | Pig ID | Pig Age a | Day of Challenge (0 dpi) | Day of Necropsy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA b | CSF Erns | BVDV Erns | SN | CSF Erns | BVDV Erns | dpi | ||||
| Flc-LOM-BErns | V1 | 1 | 42 | 6 | 0.81 |
| 6 |
|
| 21 |
| 2 | 42 | 6 | 0.73 |
| 7 |
|
| 21 | ||
| 3 | 40 | 6 | 0.76 |
| 6 |
|
| 21 | ||
| V2 | 4 | 40 | 5 | 0.68 |
| 6 |
|
| 21 | |
| 5 | 46 | 5 | 0.71 |
| 5 |
| 0.58 | 21 | ||
| 6 | 46 | 5 | 0.67 |
| ≤3 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 21 | ||
| V3 | 7 | 53 | 4 | 0.79 | 0.55 | ≤3 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 21 | |
| 8 | 53 | 4 | 0.69 |
| ≤3 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 20 | ||
| V4 | 9 | 60 | ≤3 | 0.77 | 0.40 | ≤3 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 18 | |
| 10 | 60 | ≤3 | 0.72 | 0.51 | ≤3 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 21 | ||
| Unvaccinated | Mock | 1 | 48 | ≤3 | 0.89 | 0.42 | ≤3 | 0.76 | 0.25 | 17 |
| 2 | 48 | ≤3 | 0.92 | 0.31 | ≤3 | 0.85 | 0.33 | 19 | ||
| 3 | 55 | ≤3 | 0.73 | 0.18 | ≤3 | 0.87 | 0.42 | 16 | ||
| 4 | 55 | ≤3 | 0.90 | 0.36 | ≤3 | 0.82 | 0.19 | 12 | ||
| 5 | 55 | ≤3 | 0.82 | 0.28 | ≤3 | 0.93 | 0.32 | 15 | ||
aPig age: pig age on the day of challenge. bMDA, maternally derived antibody titer (log2); CSF Erns, antibody ELISA (S/N value: >0.5 negative and 0.5≤ positive); BVDV Erns, antibody ELISA (S/P value: ≥0.6 positive and 0.6< negative); S/N, serological neutralizing antibody titer (log2); dpi, day post-CSFV inoculation. Positive samples for the CSFV Erns and BVDV Erns are marked in bold.