Monica Beckmann1, Vigdis Bruun-Olsen2, Are Hugo Pripp3, Astrid Bergland4, Toby Smith5, Kristi E Heiberg6. 1. Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway; University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: mobeck@vestreviken.no. 2. Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway. 3. OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway; Oslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 4. OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway. 5. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK. 6. Department of Medical Research, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway; OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of exercise interventions in the early recovery phase, i.e. started within the first three months after hip fracture, has been poorly studied compared to prolonged exercise interventions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of exercise interventions to improve physical function in the early phase after hip fracture. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases including MEDLINE via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Cinahl, Pedro, AMED and Web of Science were comprehensively searched till December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions initiated within the first three months after hip fracture to improve physical function, were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome was physical function assessed using walking ability, walking speed, balance, muscle strength, mobility, and endurance. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: We conducted subgroup analyses specifically to investigate outcomes of these individual measurements. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the overall effect of early exercise interventions. A meta-regression was conducted to examine the impact of study characteristic on exercise interventions. We used the PEDro score to determine quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Nine studies (669 patients) were included. Despite high statistical heterogeneity, there was high to moderate quality evidence that exercise provided benefit in improving physical function (standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.07; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.70; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome, when measured by the individual physical function outcome (p>0.05). Meta-regression demonstrated no statistically significant association between study characteristics and exercise interventions (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Exercise in the early phase of hip fracture rehabilitation can improve physical function. It remains unclear what type of exercise is superior in the early phase after hip fracture. LIMITATIONS: This conclusion should be interpreted with caution given the high statistical heterogeneity reported and non-significant subgroup analyses of specific physical function measures, which were underpowered. Protocol Registration (PROSPERO): CRD42018091135.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of exercise interventions in the early recovery phase, i.e. started within the first three months after hip fracture, has been poorly studied compared to prolonged exercise interventions. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of exercise interventions to improve physical function in the early phase after hip fracture. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases including MEDLINE via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Cinahl, Pedro, AMED and Web of Science were comprehensively searched till December 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions initiated within the first three months after hip fracture to improve physical function, were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome was physical function assessed using walking ability, walking speed, balance, muscle strength, mobility, and endurance. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: We conducted subgroup analyses specifically to investigate outcomes of these individual measurements. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the overall effect of early exercise interventions. A meta-regression was conducted to examine the impact of study characteristic on exercise interventions. We used the PEDro score to determine quality of the included studies. RESULTS: Nine studies (669 patients) were included. Despite high statistical heterogeneity, there was high to moderate quality evidence that exercise provided benefit in improving physical function (standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.07; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.70; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome, when measured by the individual physical function outcome (p>0.05). Meta-regression demonstrated no statistically significant association between study characteristics and exercise interventions (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Exercise in the early phase of hip fracture rehabilitation can improve physical function. It remains unclear what type of exercise is superior in the early phase after hip fracture. LIMITATIONS: This conclusion should be interpreted with caution given the high statistical heterogeneity reported and non-significant subgroup analyses of specific physical function measures, which were underpowered. Protocol Registration (PROSPERO): CRD42018091135.
Authors: A Goubar; S Ayis; L Beaupre; I D Cameron; R Milton-Cole; C L Gregson; A Johansen; M T Kristensen; J Magaziner; F C Martin; C Sackley; E Sadler; T O Smith; B Sobolev; K J Sheehan Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 4.507