Maryam Kavousi1, Charlotta Pisinger2, Jean-Claude Barthelemy3, Delphine De Smedt4, Konstantinos Koskinas5, Pedro Marques-Vidal6, Demosthenes Panagiotakos7, Eva Bossano Prescott8, Monica Tiberi9, Vassilios S Vassiliou10, Maja-Lisa Løchen11. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Centre for Clinical Research and Prevention, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. SNA-EPIS Research Unit-EA4607, University Hospital and Jean Monnet University, France. 4. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium. 5. Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland. 7. School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Greece. 8. Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Denmark. 9. Azienda Sanitaria, Unica Regionale Marche, Italy. 10. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, UK. 11. Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the single largest preventable risk factor for premature death of non-communicable diseases and the second leading cause of cardiovascular disease. In response to the harmful effects of tobacco smoking, the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has emerged and gained significant popularity over the past 15 years. E-cigarettes are promoted as safe alternatives for traditional tobacco smoking and are often suggested as a way to reduce or quit smoking. However, evidence suggests they are not harmless. DISCUSSION: The rapid evolution of the e-cigarette market has outpaced the legislator's regulatory capacity, leading to mixed regulations. The increasing use of e-cigarettes in adolescents and young individuals is of concern. While the long-term direct cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes remain largely unknown, the existing evidence suggests that the e-cigarette should not be regarded as a cardiovascular safe product. The contribution of e-cigarette use to reducing conventional cigarette use and smoking cessation is complex, and the impact of e-cigarette use on long-term cessation lacks sufficient evidence. CONCLUSION: This position paper describes the evidence regarding the prevalence of e-cigarette smoking, uptake of e-cigarettes in the young, related legislations, cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes and the impact of e-cigarettes on smoking cessation. Knowledge gaps in the field are also highlighted. The recommendations from the population science and public health section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology are presented.
BACKGROUND:Tobacco use is the single largest preventable risk factor for premature death of non-communicable diseases and the second leading cause of cardiovascular disease. In response to the harmful effects of tobacco smoking, the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has emerged and gained significant popularity over the past 15 years. E-cigarettes are promoted as safe alternatives for traditional tobacco smoking and are often suggested as a way to reduce or quit smoking. However, evidence suggests they are not harmless. DISCUSSION: The rapid evolution of the e-cigarette market has outpaced the legislator's regulatory capacity, leading to mixed regulations. The increasing use of e-cigarettes in adolescents and young individuals is of concern. While the long-term direct cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes remain largely unknown, the existing evidence suggests that the e-cigarette should not be regarded as a cardiovascular safe product. The contribution of e-cigarette use to reducing conventional cigarette use and smoking cessation is complex, and the impact of e-cigarette use on long-term cessation lacks sufficient evidence. CONCLUSION: This position paper describes the evidence regarding the prevalence of e-cigarette smoking, uptake of e-cigarettes in the young, related legislations, cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes and the impact of e-cigarettes on smoking cessation. Knowledge gaps in the field are also highlighted. The recommendations from the population science and public health section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology are presented.
Authors: Demilade A Adedinsewo; Amy W Pollak; Sabrina D Phillips; Taryn L Smith; Anna Svatikova; Sharonne N Hayes; Sharon L Mulvagh; Colleen Norris; Veronique L Roger; Peter A Noseworthy; Xiaoxi Yao; Rickey E Carter Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: E E A Simpson; J Davison; J Doherty; L Dunwoody; C McDowell; M McLaughlin; S Butter; M Giles Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Abdulkareem A Alhumaidan; Khulud A Al-Aali; Fahim Vohra; Fawad Javed; Tariq Abduljabbar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Frédéric Chagué; Emmanuel Reboursière; Jean Israël; Jean-Philippe Hager; Patrice Ngassa; Marc Geneste; Jean-Pierre Guinoiseau; Gilles Garet; Jacques Girardin; Jacques Sarda; Yves Cottin; Marianne Zeller Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390