| Literature DB >> 32726513 |
Nada Basoudan1,2, Antenor Rodrigues3, Alessio Gallina4, Jayne Garland5, Jordan A Guenette1,6, Babak Shadgan7, Jeremy Road8, W Darlene Reid3,9,10.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine scalene (SA) and sternocleidomastoid (SM) activation during normoxic (norm-ITL; FIO2 = 21%) and hypoxic (hyp-ITL; FIO2 = 15%) incremental inspiratory threshold loading (ITL). Thirteen healthy participants (33 ± 4 years, 9 female) performed two ITL tests breathing randomly assigned gas mixtures through an inspiratory loading device where the load was increased every two minutes until task failure. SA and SM root mean square (RMS) electromyography (EMG) were calculated and expressed as a percentage of maximum (RMS%max ) to reflect muscle activation intensity. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue were characterized as decreased SA or SM EMG median frequency during maximum inspiratory pressure maneuvers before and after ITL. Dyspnea was recorded at baseline and task failure. Ventilatory parameters and mouth pressure (Pm) were recorded throughout the ITL. SA,RMS%max and SM,RMS%max increased in association with ITL load (p ≤ .01 for both). SA,RMS%max was similar between norm-ITL and hyp-ITL (p = .17), whereas SM,RMS%max was greater during the latter (p = .001). Neither SA nor SM had a decrease in EMG median frequency after ITL (p = .75 and 0.69 respectively). Pm increased in association with ITL load (p < .001) and tended to be higher during hyp-ITL compared to norm-ITL (p = .05). Dyspnea was similar during both conditions (p > .05). There was a trend for higher tidal volumes during hyp-ITL compared to norm-ITL (p = .10). Minute ventilation was similar between both conditions (p = .23). RMS,%max of the SA and SM increased linearly with increasing ITL. The presence of hypoxia only increased SM activation. Neither SA nor SM presented myoelectric manifestations of fatigue during both conditions.Entities:
Keywords: electromyography; muscle fatigue; respiratory muscles
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726513 PMCID: PMC7389984 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Sample characteristics
| Mean ± SE | |
|---|---|
| Age, yrs | 33 ± 4 |
| BMI, kg.m−2 | 23.0 ± 1 |
| FVC, %pred | 90 ± 4 |
| FVC, L | 4.7 ± 1.5 |
| FEV1, %pred | 97 ± 5 |
| FEV1/FVC, %pred | 101 ± 3 |
| MIP, cmH2O | 123 ± 10 |
| MIP, %pred | 100 ± 4 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; MIP, maximum inspiratory pressure.
FIGURE 1Scalene (SA) and sternomastoid (SM) root mean square in % maximum activation (RMS,%max) during normoxic (closed circles) and hypoxic ITL (open circles). Intensity: two‐way ANOVA main effect for ITL intensity; FIO2: two‐way ANOVA main effect for norm‐ITL vs. hyp‐ITL; Intensity*FIO2: two‐way ANOVA interaction between ITL intensity and FIO2
FIGURE 3Tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation (VE), mouth pressure (Pm), pressure‐time‐product (PTP), and end‐tidal CO2 (PETCO2) during normoxic (closed circles) and hypoxic ITL (open circles). Intensity: two‐way ANOVA main effect for ITL intensity; FIO2: two‐way ANOVA main effect for norm‐ITL vs. hyp‐ITL; Intensity*FIO2: two‐way ANOVA interaction between ITL intensity and FIO2
FIGURE 2Scalene (SA) and sternomastoid (SM) electromyography (EMG) median frequency (MF) during maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) maneuvers pre, post, and recovery (10 min after ITL) during normoxic (closed circles) and hypoxic ITL (open circles). Intensity: two‐way ANOVA main effect for ITL intensity; FIO2: two‐way ANOVA main effect for norm‐ITL vs. hyp‐ITL; Intensity*FIO2: two‐way ANOVA interaction between ITL intensity and FIO2