| Literature DB >> 32726335 |
Agnieszka Jankowicz-Szymańska1, Michał Fałatowicz1, Eliza Smoła1, Renata Błyszczuk1, Katarzyna Wódka1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Incorrect positioning of the body in space increases the tension of the myofascial tissue and overloads the skeleton. It is important to look for factors that affect the deterioration of body posture that could be eliminated. Understanding the interrelationship between the positioning of individual body segments should be the key knowledge for those involved in the prevention and correction of faulty body posture. The study aimed to determine the relationship between the degree of physiological curvatures of the spine and the incidence of incorrect knee position.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32726335 PMCID: PMC7390398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Frontal knees position measurement (intermalleolar distance of 2.5 cm or more were considered as valgus knees and intercondylar distance of 2.5 cm or more as varus knees).
Fig 2Zebris pointer report—spinal curvatures measurement (the thresholds determining flat and round thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis).
Comparison of studied variables among girls and boys.
| Variable | Gender | Mean | Median | Min-Max | St Dev | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | Girls | 10.99 | 11.00 | 10.00–12.00 | 0.81 | 0.579 |
| Boys | 10.95 | 11.00 | 10.00–12.00 | 0.81 | ||
| Body height [cm] | Girls | 147.08 | 147.00 | 128.40–167.50 | 8.76 | 0.251 |
| Boys | 146.34 | 145.70 | 122.40–170.50 | 8.20 | ||
| Body weight [kg] | Girls | 37.78 | 37.30 | 21.00–57.60 | 7.63 | 0.013 |
| Boys | 36.33 | 35.55 | 21.10–57.60 | 6.50 | ||
| BMI [kg/m2] | Girls | 17.29 | 17.41 | 12.56–21.43 | 2.09 | 0.004 |
| Boys | 16.85 | 16.84 | 11.85–21.20 | 1.85 | ||
| Intercondylar distance [cm] | Girls | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00–6.00 | 1.00 | 0.168 |
| Boys | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.00–6.00 | 1.16 | ||
| Intermalleolar distance [cm] | Girls | 1.89 | 1.00 | 0.00–9.00 | 2.16 | 0.002 |
| Boys | 1.38 | 0.50 | 0.00–9.50 | 1.84 | ||
| Thoracic kyphosis [˚] | Girls | 37.45 | 38.10 | 0.00–67.10 | 12.01 | 0.001 |
| Boys | 40.54 | 40.80 | 0.00–67.30 | 12.16 | ||
| Lumbar lordosis [˚] | Girls | 26.63 | 27.90 | 0.00–50.00 | 11.43 | 0.008 |
| Boys | 24.90 | 25.00 | 0.00–50.00 | 10.98 |
* statistically significant difference
The incidence of incorrect knee alignment among study participants with flat, normal and round thoracic kyphosis.
| Gender | Thoracic kyphosis | Valgus knee n (%) | Normal knee n (%) | Varus knee n (%) | Row totals n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | flat | 44 (37.93%) | 60 (51.72%) | 12 (10.34%) | 116 (33.05%) |
| normal | 43 (35.83%) | 68 (56.67%) | 9 (7.50%) | 120 (34.19%) | |
| round | 38 (33.04%) | 72 (62.61%) | 5 (4.35%) | 115 (32.76%) | |
| Boys | flat | 28 (35.90%) | 46 (58.97%) | 4 (5.13%) | 78 (23.35%) |
| normal | 29 (25.00%) | 73 (62.93%) | 14 (12.07%) | 116 (34.73%) | |
| round | 34 (24.29%) | 92 (65.71%) | 14 (10.00%) | 140 (41.92%) | |
| Column totals | 216 | 411 | 58 | 685 | |
The incidence of incorrect knee alignment among study participants with flat, normal and round lumbar lordosis.
| Gender | Lumbar lordosis | Valgus knee n (%) | Normal knee n (%) | Varus knee n (%) | Row totals n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | flat | 33 (32.67%) | 60 (59.41%) | 8 (7.92%) | 101 (28.77%) |
| normal | 20 (25.97%) | 50 (64.94%) | 7 (9.09%) | 77 (21.94%) | |
| round | 72 (41.62%) | 90 (52.02%) | 11 (6.36%) | 173 (49.29%) | |
| Boys | flat | 28 (23.73%) | 80 (67.80%) | 10 (8.47%) | 118 (35.33%) |
| normal | 24 (26.37%) | 58 (63.74%) | 9 (9.89%) | 91 (27.25%) | |
| round | 39 (31.20%) | 73 (58.40%) | 13 (10.40%) | 125 (37.42%) |
Relationships between the depth of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis and the intercondylar distance and intermalleolar distance in the studied girls and boys.
| Correlated variables | Gender | R | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thoracic kyphosis & ICD | Girls | 0.003 | 0.942 |
| Boys | 0.143 | 0.008 | |
| All | 0.086 | 0.024 | |
| Thoracic kyphosis & IMD | Girls | -0.095 | 0.074 |
| Boys | -0.126 | 0.021 | |
| All | -0.125 | 0.001 | |
| Lumbar lordosis & ICD | Girls | -0.049 | 0.358 |
| Boys | -0.001 | 0.979 | |
| All | -0.030 | 0.428 | |
| Lumbar lordosis & IMD | Girls | 0.030 | 0.574 |
| Boys | 0.030 | 0.589 | |
| All | 0.041 | 0.278 |
* statistically significant correlation, ICD–intercondylar distance, IMD–intermalleolar distance, R—correlation coefficient
The depth of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis among participants with valgus, normal or varus knees.
| Variable | Knee position | Mean | Median | Min-Max | St Dev | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoracic kyphosis [˚] | Valgus n = 216 | 37.20 | 38.75 | 0.70–65.70 | 12.15 | VL vs N p = 0.02 |
| Normal n = 411 | 39.80 | 40.20 | 0.00–67.30 | 12.20 | ||
| Varus n = 58 | 39.53 | 36.11 | 17.50–62.80 | 11.50 | ||
| Lumbar lordosis [˚] | Valgus n = 216 | 26.64 | 28.20 | 0.00–50.00 | 11.45 | VL vs N p = 0.38 VL vs VR p = 0.72 VR vs N p = 0.99 |
| Normal n = 411 | 25.39 | 25.50 | 0.00–50.00 | 11.30 | ||
| Varus n = 58 | 25.37 | 26.20 | 0.00–50.00 | 9.87 |
* statistically significant difference, VL–valgus knee, VR–varus knee, N–normal knee position