| Literature DB >> 32725842 |
Yong Dong1,2,3,4, Kaitao Wang1, Qitong Weng1,2,3, Tongjie Wang1,2, Peiqing Zhou1,2,3, Xiaofei Liu1,2, Yang Geng1,2, Lijuan Liu1,2, Hongling Wu1,2, Jinyong Wang1,2,3,5,6, Juan Du1,2,3,5,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Exploring approaches of extending the haematopoiesis time window of MPPs and lineage-committed progenitors might produce promising therapeutic effects. NUP98-HOXA10hd (NA) fusion protein can expand long-term haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and promote engraftment competitiveness without causing obvious oncogenesis. Our objectives were to investigate the roles of NA fusion protein in MPP and downstream lineage-committed progenitor context.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32725842 PMCID: PMC7507399 DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Prolif ISSN: 0960-7722 Impact factor: 6.831
Figure 1MPPs overexpressing NA support long‐term multi‐lineage haematopoiesis in primary recipient mice. A, Schematic strategy of MPP transplantation. For MPP transplantation assay, 300 sorted MPP cells (Lin−CD48−c‐kit+Sca1+CD135+CD150−) were mixed with 5 × 105 total BM helper/competitor cells and subsequently injected into the retro‐orbital vein of the irradiated recipients. B, Dynamic contribution of donor‐derived white blood cells (Tdtomato+ or CD45.1+) in peripheral blood of recipient mice at different time points post‐transplantation. C, Dynamic donor‐derived multi‐lineage reconstitution for NA MPPs group in (B). Four mice in each group were bled regularly up to 44 wk post‐transplantation. Lineage analysis of donor‐derived white blood cells in PB at 16 wk (D) and 44 wk (E) post‐transplantation. Flow plots from one representative mouse of NA MPPs group are shown. Data are represented as means ± SEM. Unpaired Student's t test (two‐tailed) was performed. n = 4 mice, *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001
Figure 2Transcriptome profiling of NA MPPs. A, Gene ontology enrichment analysis of upregulated genes. One thousand sorted MPP were sorted as each sample of sequencing library preparation. Genes with at least 2‐fold upregulation over WT MPPs were included for GO enrichment analysis. B and C, GSEA analysis of gene sets of hematopoiesis_stem_cell_long_term, KEGG_cell_cycle (B), Hoxa9 targets and targets_of_Hoxa9_and_Meis1 (C) in transcriptome of NA MPPs compared with WT MPPs. Gene sets were obtained from the data set of c2.all.v5.2 symbols of the GSEA website (https://gsea‐msigdb.org). Selected pathways with significant changes are shown (FDR < 0.25, P < .05)
Figure 3NA MPPs give rise to abundant lineage‐committed progenitors in primary recipient mice. NA‐MPP recipient mice were sacrified for bone marrow progenitor analysis 20 wk post‐transplantation if not otherwise indicated. A, Flow cytometric analysis of donor‐derived myeloid progenitor cells in primary recipient mice. Recipient mice were sacrified for analysis at indicated time points post‐transplantation. B, Absolute number of MP cells (upper) and bone marrow cellularity (lower) of donor‐derived white blood cells. Donor‐contributed percentage were analysed by flow cytometry and used for calculation. (n = 3) (C) Flow cytometric analysis of donor‐derived CLP and MP cells in primary recipient mice. Flow plots from one representative mouse of each group are shown. D, Absolute number of donor‐derived CLP and MP cells per million BMNCs. E, Flow cytometric analysis of donor‐derived LSK cells in primary recipient mice. Flow plots from one representative mouse of each group are shown. F, Dynamic contribution of donor‐derived white blood cells (Tdtomato+ or CD45.1+) in peripheral blood of secondary recipient mice at different time points post‐transplantation. 5 × 106 total BM cells from primary recipient mice were injected into the retro‐orbital vein of the lethally irradiated recipients for secondary transplantation (n = 4). G, Donor contribution in bone marrow of secondary recipient mice. Secondary recipient mice of NA MPPs group were sacrificed for analysis 20 wk post‐transplantation (n = 3). Data are represented as means ± SEM. Unpaired Student's t test (two‐tailed) was performed. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. BMNCs, bone marrow nucleated cells; CLP, common lymphoid progenitors; MP, myeloid progenitors
Figure 4Transcriptome profiling of NA MPs. A, Gene ontology enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in NA MPs. MPs were sorted from primary recipient mice to construct RNA‐seq libraries. Genes with at least 2‐fold change over WT MPs were included for GO enrichment analysis. B, GSEA analysis of gene sets of Hoxa9_targets, targets_of_Hoxa9_and_meis1, immortalized_by_Hoxa9_and_Meis1, Hoxa5_targets, Hoxa10_targets and myeloid_differentiation in transcriptome of NA MPs compared with WT MPs. Gene sets were obtained from the data set of c2.all.v5.2 symbols of the GSEA website (https://gsea‐msigdb.org). Selected pathways with significant changes are shown (FDR < 0.25, P < .05)