| Literature DB >> 32725666 |
Alexandra Thajer1, Katharina Truschner1, Anselm Jorda1, Gabriele Skacel1, Brian Horsak2, Susanne Greber-Platzer1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32725666 PMCID: PMC7818106 DOI: 10.1111/apa.15498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Paediatr ISSN: 0803-5253 Impact factor: 2.299
Median (interquartile range) differences between baseline and follow‐up
| Intervention | Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR |
| Median | IQR |
| |||
| BFP (%) | 0.0 | −1.4 | 1.3 | .828 | 0.3 | −1.0 | 1.0 | .879 |
| FFM (kg) | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.8 |
| 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.1 |
|
| Protein (g) | 3 | −30 | 59 | .351 | −5 | −33 | 29 | .679 |
| Fat (g) | −1 | −18 | 32 | .526 | −10 | −46 | 32 | .528 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 8 | −58 | 91 | .627 | −18 | −66 | 57 | .586 |
| Energy (kcal) | 86 | −450 | 690 | .526 | −190 | −1044 | 527 | .420 |
Note that body fat percentage (BFP) and fat‐free mass (FFM) were analysed using a dep. t test. The other variables were analysed using a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Negative values represent a reduction from baseline to follow‐up. Bold values indicate significant difference at the P < .05 level.