Literature DB >> 32725616

Colonoscopy-related adverse events and mortality in an Italian organized colorectal cancer screening program.

Luca Benazzato1, Manuel Zorzi2, Giulio Antonelli3, Stefano Guzzinati2, Cesare Hassan3, Alberto Fantin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-colonoscopy adverse events are a key quality indicator in population-based colorectal cancer screening programs, and affect safety and costs. This study aimed to assess colonoscopy-related adverse events and mortality in a screening setting.
METHODS: We retrieved data from patients undergoing colonoscopy within a screening program (fecal immunochemical test every 2 years, 50-69-year-olds, or post-polypectomy surveillance) in Italy between 2002 and 2014, to assess the rate of post-colonoscopy adverse events and mortality. Any admission within 30 days of screening colonoscopy was reviewed to capture possible events. Mortality registries were also matched with endoscopy databases to investigate 30-day post-colonoscopy mortality. Association of each outcome with patient-/procedure-related variables was assessed using multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 117 881 screening colonoscopies (66 584, 56.5 %, with polypectomy) were included. Overall, 497 (0.42 %) post-colonoscopy adverse events occurred: 281 (0.24 %) bleedings (3.69‰/0.68‰, operative/diagnostic procedures) and 65 (0.06 %) perforations (0.75‰/0.29‰, respectively). At multivariable analysis, bleeding was associated with polyp size (≥ 20 mm: odds ratio [OR] 16.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 9.38-28.29), proximal location (OR 1.46, 95 %CI 1.14-1.87), and histology severity (high risk adenoma: OR 5.6, 95 %CI 2.43-12.91), while perforation was associated with endoscopic resection (OR 2.91, 95 %CI 1.62-5.22), polyp size (OR 4.34, 95 %CI 1.46-12.92), and proximal location (OR 1.94, 95 %CI 1.12-3.37). Post-colonoscopy mortality occurred in 15 /117 881 cases (1.27/10 000 colonoscopies).
CONCLUSIONS: In an organized screening program, post-colonoscopy adverse events were rare but not negligible. The most frequent event was post-polypectomy bleeding, especially after resection of large (≥ 20 mm) and proximal lesions. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32725616     DOI: 10.1055/a-1228-9225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   9.776


  3 in total

1.  Postpolypectomy fever in patients with serious infection: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Wang Jing; Li Qinghua; Yang Zhiwen
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Digestive perforations related to endoscopy procedures: a local management charter based on local evidence and experts' opinion.

Authors:  Gaspard Bertrand; Jérôme Rivory; Maud Robert; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Élise Pelascini; Olivier Monneuse; Laurent Gruner; Gilles Poncet; Pierre-Jean Valette; Hélène Gimonet; Florian Rostain; Charles-Éric Ber; Yves Bouffard; André Boibieux; Marina Ciochina; Verena Landel; Hélène Boyer; Jérémie Jacques; Thierry Ponchon; Mathieu Pioche
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

3.  Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses.

Authors:  Wenwen Cai; Xingxing Zhang; Yanxia Luo; Minshan Ye; Yu Guo; Weiqing Ruan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.908

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.