| Literature DB >> 32725556 |
Xia Luo1,2, Xinyi Xiang1,2, Guoyi Huang1,2, Xiaorui Song1,2, Peijia Wang1,2, Yuanhao Yang1,2, Kaidao Fu3,4, Rongxiao Che5,6.
Abstract
Extensive construction of dams by humans has caused alterations in flow regimes and concomitant alterations in river ecosystems. Even so, bacterioplankton diversity in large rivers influenced by cascade dams has been largely ignored. In this study, bacterial community diversity and profiles of seven cascade dams along the720 km of the Lancang River were studied using Illumina sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Spatiotemporal variations of bacterial communities in sediment and water of the Gongguoqiao hydroelectric dam and factors affecting these variations were also examined. Microbial diversity and richness in surface water increased slightly from upstream toward downstream along the river. A significant positive correlation between spatial distance and dissimilarities in bacterial community structure was confirmed (Mantel test, r = 0.4826, p = 0.001). At the Gongguoqiao hydroelectric dam, temporal differences in water overwhelmed spatial variability in bacterial communities. Temperature, precipitation, and nutrient levels were major drivers of seasonal microbial changes. Most functional groups associated with carbon cycling in sediment samples decreased from winter to summer. Our findings improve our understanding of associations, compositions, and predicted functional profiles of microbial communities in a large riverine ecosystem influenced by multiple cascade dams.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial community; Cascade dam construction; Lancang River; Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase; Sediment; Spatiotemporal distribution; Water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32725556 PMCID: PMC7603470 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10159-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Overview and detailed map of the Lancang River basin and distribution of sampling sites across the river. The open dots represent the water sampling sites. The half-solid dots indicate the points where both the water and sediments were taken
p values from repeated measures ANOVA for the factors season as a repeated factor and the sampling site (Site) as a fixed factor during the experimental period (winter and summer)
| Water | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of variation | T | pH | DO | ORP | COND | TURB | TDS | TN | TP | N:P | Richness | |
| Site | 0.298 | 0.404 | < | < | < | < | 0.174 | < | ||||
| F | 1.37 | 1.05 | 129.27 | 42.82 | 79.09 | 1263.99 | 183.16 | 2.27 | 21.34 | 43.31 | 11.48 | |
| Season | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | < | |||
| F | 152.78 | 10.04 | 2486.60 | 1232.52 | 5750.36 | 2382.89 | 8320.01 | 273.06 | 42.25 | 145.80 | 2042.70 | |
| Site × Season | 0.983 | 0.717 | < | < | < | < | 0.428 | 0.115 | 0.114 | |||
| F | 0.05 | 0.46 | 54.37 | 17.75 | 41.33 | 1042.54 | 110.84 | 0.93 | 2.43 | 2.45 | 17.71 | |
| Sediment | ||||||||||||
| Source of variation | WC | OM | MA | TN | TP | N:P | Richness | |||||
| Site | < | < | ||||||||||
| F | 134.76 | 6.77 | 12.34 | 4.35 | 39.34 | 8.48 | 14.46 | |||||
| Season | 0.419 | < | < | |||||||||
| F | 39.95 | 0.81 | 1122.95 | 3.65 | 1257.96 | 10.52 | 9.16 | |||||
| Site × Season | 0.058 | 0.101 | 0.083 | |||||||||
| F | 3.29 | 2.59 | 13.24 | 8.98 | 6.53 | 4.64 | 3.94 | |||||
Fig. 2Bacterial richness in water and sediments from upstream to downstream of S2 at two seasons
Fig. 3Bacterial richness (a) and relative richness (b) in water from the total 13 sampling sites along the Lancang River from upstream to downstream. Relative richness is the ratio between the richness at this site and the maximal richness of all sites. Error bar indicates one standard deviation of two replicates samples at each sampling site
Summary of high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes in water and sediment samples
| Season | Sample ID | OTUs number | Shannon | Chao1 | ACE | Pielou’s evenness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | Winter | S1 | 2272 | 4.39 | 4198 | 4476 | 0.57 |
| S2-U | 1983 | 4.22 | 4318 | 4539 | 0.56 | ||
| S2-D1 | 2349 | 4.26 | 4858 | 5258 | 0.55 | ||
| S2-D2 | 2115 | 4.29 | 3815 | 4211 | 0.56 | ||
| S2-D3 | 4528 | 5.62 | 8442 | 8958 | 0.67 | ||
| S3-U | 2225 | 5.05 | 3852 | 3949 | 0.66 | ||
| S3-D | 1375 | 5.23 | 2311 | 2345 | 0.72 | ||
| S4-D | 2708 | 5.90 | 4195 | 4284 | 0.75 | ||
| S5-D | 2293 | 5.56 | 4199 | 4286 | 0.72 | ||
| S6-U | 1602 | 4.92 | 2450 | 2404 | 0.68 | ||
| S6-D | 1422 | 5.37 | 2704 | 2695 | 0.73 | ||
| S7-D | 2401 | 5.42 | 3972 | 4048 | 0.70 | ||
| S8 | 3232 | 5.76 | 5099 | 5350 | 0.71 | ||
| Summer | S2-U | 6598 | 6.42 | 11195 | 11908 | 0.73 | |
| S2-D1 | 8181 | 7.04 | 13741 | 14577 | 0.78 | ||
| S2-D2 | 7620 | 6.70 | 13001 | 13873 | 0.75 | ||
| S2-D3 | 6661 | 7.03 | 9890 | 10061 | 0.80 | ||
| Sediment | Winter | S2-U | 6717 | 7.45 | 9871 | 10089 | 0.84 |
| S2-D1 | 4545 | 6.44 | 6224 | 6132 | 0.77 | ||
| S2-D2 | 5966 | 7.04 | 8898 | 9170 | 0.81 | ||
| S2-D3 | 5210 | 6.31 | 8318 | 8450 | 0.74 | ||
| Summer | S2-U | 7805 | 7.77 | 11704 | 11995 | 0.87 | |
| S2-D1 | 3496 | 5.66 | 5394 | 5137 | 0.70 | ||
| S2-D2 | 5039 | 6.76 | 7502 | 7333 | 0.80 | ||
| S2-D3 | 2769 | 6.25 | 3903 | 3810 | 0.79 |
Fig. 4Community composition at the phylum taxonomic level for all 22 water samples from 11 sites (n = 2 for each bar) along the Lancang River collected during winter (a), and 8 water samples, 8 sediment samples from 4 sites (n = 2 for each bar) along the Gongguoqiao hydroelectric dam collected during winter (b, ), 12 water samples, 12 sediment samples from 4 sites (n = 3 for each bar) along the Gongguoqiao hydroelectric dam collected during summer (b, )
Fig. 5Bacterial community composition of all water and sediment samples as indicated by NMDS plot
The correlation (r) and significance (p) were determined by Mantel tests between physiochemical variables and microbial community composition in water and sediments in winter and summer
| Variable | Water | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winter1 | Summer2 | Total3 | ||||
| T | 0.74** | 0.001 | − 0.087 | 0.71 | 0.25 | 0.001 |
| pH | 0.18 | 0.013 | 0.19 | 0.063 | 0.14 | 0.006 |
| ORP | 0.10 | 0.064 | 0.36** | 0.009 | 0.15 | 0.002 |
| COND | 0.78** | 0.001 | 0.33** | 0.009 | 0.35 | 0.001 |
| TURB | 0.40** | 0.001 | 0.3 | 0.025 | 0.35 | 0.001 |
| DO | 0.60** | 0.001 | 0.085 | 0.27 | 0.46 | 0.001 |
| TDS | 0.80** | 0.001 | 0.27 | 0.036 | 0.37 | 0.001 |
| TN | 0.15 | 0.029 | − 0.1 | 0.775 | 0.24 | 0.001 |
| TP | 0.21 | 0.015 | 0.35 | 0.017 | 0.21 | 0.001 |
| N:P | 0.21 | 0.015 | 0.35 | 0.016 | 0.21 | 0.001 |
| Variable | Sediment2 | |||||
| Winter | Summer | Total3 | ||||
| WC | 0.071 | 0.34 | 0.56** | 0.001 | 0.27** | 0.006 |
| OM | − 0.02 | 0.51 | 0.41** | 0.002 | 0.11 | 0.154 |
| TN | 0.14 | 0.21 | − 0.094 | 0.76 | − 0.017 | 0.55 |
| TP | 0.031 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 0.28** | 0.004 |
| N:P | 0.031 | 0.44 | 0.36** | 0.005 | 0.28** | 0.004 |
| MA | − 0.17 | 0.73 | 0.014 | 0.49 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
1Data were from upstream and downstream of all sampling sites (i.e., S1–S8)
2Data were from upstream and downstream of S2
3It includes all data from winter and summer
**Significant correlations at p < 0.01
Fig. 6RDA of the bacterial community and the most significant physiochemical variables shaping bacterial community composition and structure in water (a) and sediment (b) along the Lancang River. Symbols indicated sampling sites. Arrows indicate environmental variables and bacterial community composition in phylum level. The lengths of the arrows indicated how much variance was explained by the corresponding variable. The angles between arrows indicate correlations between individual environmental variables
Fig. 7Clustered bar plots of relative OTU functional group relative abundances along the Lancang River based on FAPROTAX. The left panel displayed the abundance ratio of different functional groups; the middle showed the percentage of functional group abundance within the 95% confidence interval; the right indicated p value. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001