Literature DB >> 32725140

Remote monitoring of cardiac implanted electronic devices: legal requirements and ethical principles - ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee/EHRA joint task force report.

Jens Cosedis Nielsen1, Josef Kautzner2, Ruben Casado-Arroyo3, Haran Burri4, Stefaan Callens5, Martin R Cowie6, Kenneth Dickstein7, Inga Drossart8, Ginger Geneste9, Zekeriya Erkin9, Fabien Hyafil10, Alexander Kraus11, Valentina Kutyifa12, Eduard Marin13,14, Christian Schulze15, David Slotwiner16, Kenneth Stein17, Stefano Zanero18, Hein Heidbuchel19, Alan G Fraser20,21.   

Abstract

The European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) imposes legal responsibilities concerning the collection and processing of personal information from individuals who live in the EU. It has particular implications for the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). This report from a joint Task Force of the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Regulatory Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends a common legal interpretation of the GDPR. Manufacturers and hospitals should be designated as joint controllers of the data collected by remote monitoring (depending upon the system architecture) and they should have a mutual contract in place that defines their respective roles; a generic template is proposed. Alternatively, they may be two independent controllers. Self-employed cardiologists also are data controllers. Third-party providers of monitoring platforms may act as data processors. Manufacturers should always collect and process the minimum amount of identifiable data necessary, and wherever feasible have access only to pseudonymized data. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities have been reported concerning the security of transmission of data between a patient's device and the transceiver, so manufacturers should use secure communication protocols. Patients need to be informed how their remotely monitored data will be handled and used, and their informed consent should be sought before their device is implanted. Review of consent forms in current use revealed great variability in length and content, and sometimes very technical language; therefore, a standard information sheet and generic consent form are proposed. Cardiologists who care for patients with CIEDs that are remotely monitored should be aware of these issues. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implantable electronic device; Cybersecurity; Data controller; Data processor; EHRA; ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee; General Data Protection Regulation; Informed consent; Informed consent form; Joint data controller; Remote monitoring

Year:  2020        PMID: 32725140     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.

Authors:  John Torous; Sandra Bucci; Imogen H Bell; Lars V Kessing; Maria Faurholt-Jepsen; Pauline Whelan; Andre F Carvalho; Matcheri Keshavan; Jake Linardon; Joseph Firth
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?

Authors:  Knut Tore Lappegård; Frode Moe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Cybersecurity: The need for data and patient safety with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Subrat Das; Gregory P Siroky; Shawn Lee; Davendra Mehta; Ranjit Suri
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.343

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.