Literature DB >> 32724898

The use of ultrasonography in the evaluation and management of peyronie's disease.

Manuel R de Jesús1, Ranjith Ramasamy1, Emad Ibrahim1, Manuel Molina1, Thomas A Masterson1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile dysfunction; Imaging modalities; Peyronie’s disease; Ultrasonography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32724898      PMCID: PMC7386432          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolvj.2020.100047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Video J        ISSN: 2590-0897


× No keyword cloud information.

Objective:

To outline the steps in the ultrasonographic evaluation of Peyronie’s disease and determine its use in the diagnosis, classification and treatment of this disorder.

Design:

Video presentation

Setting:

Outpatient Urology clinic.

Patient(s):

All patients with Peyronie’s disease undergoing penile ultrasonography who signed a written, informed consent for video and audio recording.

Intervention(s):

Alprostadil + papaverine + phentolamine intracavernosal injections, penile ultrasonography, phenylephrine intracavernosal injections.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

Penile plaque classification, penile blood flow and degree of penile curvature.

Result(s):

During the period November 2018-December 2019, 156 patients were evaluated for Peyronie’s disease using ultrasonography, from which 109 patients presened calcified plaques. Out of these, 59 (45.1%) patients were found to have type 2 plaques, making this one the most common type of plaque. The average age in this group of patients was 59.8 ± 6.0 years, the average degree of curvature was 49.4 ± 23.0°, and the average duration of symptoms was 27.2 ± 36.9 months. During the vascular evaluation with Doppler ultrasonography, 23 (14.7%) patients presented PSV 25 < 30 cm3 /s. Degree of curvature was not found to be associated with the severity of calcification (p = 0.17). This video demonstrates the advantages that ultrasonography provides in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease compared to other imaging modalities. It avoids radiation, easily detects plaques and calcification, and is more familiar to urologists. We outline the steps of the procedure; the possible findings during the penile tissue evaluation; the different types, location and size of plaques; the direction of penile curvature and deformity, and the possible findings on Doppler ultrasonography, which can further guide the management of these patients Figs. 1-4, Tables 1-4.
Fig. 1.

Peyronie’s disease illustration.

Gelman, Joel, et al. “Peyronie’s Disease Information And Examples”. The Center For Reconstructive Urology, www.centerforreconstructiveurology.org/peyronies-disease/. [2].

Fig. 4.

Treatment of Peyronie’s disease based on penile Doppler ultrasonography findings.

Pramar M, Masterson J, Masterson T. Current Opinion in Urology. 2020 [5].

Table 1

Peyronie’s disease plaque typing chart.

Plaques in Peyronie’s Disease
Types of plaquesCharacteristics
Type 1Tunica albuginea thickening with slight or no shadowing.
Type 2Tunica albuginea with moderate calcification and partial shadowing.
Type 3Tunica albuginea calcification with complete shadowing.

Pawłowska E, Bianek-Bodzak A. Imaging modalities and clinical assesment in men affected with Peyronie’s disease. Polish J Radiol [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited 2019 Dec 17];76(3):33–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802839 [1].

Table 4

Vascular evaluation of patients with Peyronie’s disease in the University of Miami Hospital, Department of Male Reproductive Medicine, in the period November 2018-December 2019.

Vascular evaluationVascular parameterN (%)
PSV < 25 cm3 /s18 (11.5%)
PSV 25 < 30 cm3 /s23 (14.7%)
EDV > 5 cm3 /s12 (7.7%)
Penile Doppler ultrasound is a useful tool in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease. Understanding the type of calcification and degree of curvature can aid to decide the management of Peyronie’s disease.
Table 2

Prospective evaluation of calcification in patients with Peyronie’s disease evaluated in the University of Miami Hospital, Department of Male Reproductive Medicine, in the period November 2018-December 2019.

Prospective Evaluation of Calcification
Type 1Type 2Type 3
N (%)33 (30.2)59 (45. 1)17 (15.6)
Age (years)53.8 ± 12.059.8 ± 6.055.3 ± 7.9
Curvature (degrees)36.9 ± 16.049.4 ± 23.048.2 ± 23.8
Duration of symptoms (months)38.8 ± 61.727.2 ± 36.917.6 ± 12.6
Table 3

Patients with Peyronie’s disease who were candidates for collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment in the University of Miami Hospital, Department of Male Reproductive Medicine, in the period November 2018-December 2019.

Candidates for Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum
NoncalcifiedCalcifiedp
N (%)26 (28.3)66 (71. 7)
Curvature (degrees)46.1 ± 14.751.2 ± 17.60.17
Duration of symptoms
(months)39.5 ± 61.222.6 ± 30.30.34
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  Madhumita Parmar; John M Masterson; Thomas A Masterson
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Imaging modalities and clinical assesment in men affected with Peyronie's disease.

Authors:  Emilia Pawłowska; Agnieszka Bianek-Bodzak
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2011-07
  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The potential of platelet-rich plasma injections and stem cell therapy for penile rejuvenation.

Authors:  Joseph M Israeli; Soum D Lokeshwar; Iakov V Efimenko; Thomas A Masterson; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.408

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.