| Literature DB >> 32724583 |
Roger Djoulde Darman1, Matsowa Bouopda Sidoine2, Venassius Wirnkar Lendzemo3.
Abstract
In order to produce biscuits from off-season sorghum, a local "Muskwari" sorghum was milled and sieved. This flour was used to produce shortbread biscuits with different substitutions rates of wheat flour to that of sorghum. The standard formulation of this same type of shortbread biscuits was used and biscuits were produced with incorporation rates of wheat flour to that of sorghum, from 0% to 100%, with a gap of 10 between two consecutives percentages. The technological characterization of the sorghum flour produced indicates a good water absorption capacity, and interesting solubility index and swelling rate. Technological aspect indicated that by changing speed and kneading time, resting the dough, it is possible to produce 100% sorghum flour shortbread biscuits. Shortbread biscuits made from 70% of wheat flour incorporation had the best average scores for overall preference criteria (6.97 ± 1.30), color (7.1 ± 1.45), and texture (6.62 ± 1.54). For smell and taste criteria, the 40% biscuits and the witness received the highest average scores, respectively, namely 6.77 ± 1.55 for smell and 7.12 ± 1.29 for taste. Analysis of the nutritional and energy intake of the control biscuit and the 70% substitution revealed that between the two, the latter had a significantly higher intake of total carbohydrates (58.51 g), dietary fiber (2.15 g), and total energy (454.1 kcal.Entities:
Keywords: Muskwari; flour; shortbread biscuits; sorghum
Year: 2020 PMID: 32724583 PMCID: PMC7382165 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Process production of Madjéri soghum flour
Technological characteristics of produce flours
| Item (%) | Wheat flour | Sorghum flour |
|---|---|---|
| TE | 11.27 ± 2.6 | 8.33 ± 2.36 |
| CAE | 148.15 ± 6.4 | 102.26 ± 6.41 |
| IS | 16.06 ± 5.3 | 20 ± 5.25 |
| TG | 101.92 ± 4.25 | 102.94 ± 5.2 |
FIGURE 2Processing of shortbread biscuits made from sorghum flour
Average dough and dough rest times based on substitution rate
| Substitution rates (%) | Duration of kneading (min) | Resting time of the dough (min) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 10 ± 1.8a | 300 ± 2a |
| 20 | 9 ± 1.3a | 210 ± 1b |
| 30 | 7 ± 1.5ab | 180 ± 1.2b |
| 40 | 7 ± 0.8b | 22 ± 0c |
| 50 | 5 ± 0.6c | 19 ± 0.6c |
| 60 | 4 ± 1dc | 17 ± 1cd |
| 70 | 4d | 16 ± 0.6d |
| 80 | 4 ± 0.5d | 13 ± 0.6de |
| 90 | 3 ± 1d | 11 ± 1e |
| 100 | 3 ± 1d | 0f |
Same lower‐case letters in superscript indicate no statistical significance diference between means.
FIGURE 3Hedonic biscuits notation based on substitution rates
FIGURE 4Analysis of variances of Hedonic biscuits scores according to the substitution rates. Tx = x.10%. NB: Two means are significantly different if 0 does not belong to the confidence interval of their difference (p < .05)
Proximate composition and energy intakes of muskari biscuits
| Macro nutriments (g/100 g) | 100 | 70 |
|---|---|---|
| Proteins | 5.65 ± 1.00 | 5.22 ± 0.32 |
| Lipids | 21.72 ± 2.23 | 22.7 ± 2.32 |
| Sugar | 57.50 ± 1.05 | 58.51 ± 1.02 |
| Saturated | 4.30 ± 1.06 | 4.35 ± 0.95 |
| Sodium | 0.067 ± 0.00 | 0.067 ± 0.00 |
| Fibers | 1.78 ± 0.01 | 2.15 ± 0.00 |
| Energy (kcal) | 451.4 ± 12.56 | 454.1 ± 11.23 |