| Literature DB >> 32724458 |
Xianguang Ding1, Dan Li2, Jiang Jiang3,4.
Abstract
Noble metal Au nanoparticles have attracted extensive interests in the past decades, due to their size and morphology dependent localized surface plasmon resonances. Their unique optical property, high chemical stability, good biocompatibility, and easy functionalization make them promising candidates for a variety of biomedical applications, including bioimaging, biosensing, and cancer therapy. With the intention of enhancing their optical response in the near infrared window and endowing them with additional magnetic properties, Au nanoparticles have been integrated with other functional nanomaterials that possess complementary attributes, such as copper chalcogenides and magnetic metal oxides. The as constructed hybrid nanostructures are expected to exhibit unconventional properties compared to their separate building units, due to nanoscale interactions between materials with different physicochemical properties, thus broadening the application scope and enhancing the overall performance of the hybrid nanostructures. In this review, we summarize some recent progresses in the design and synthesis of noble metal Au-based hybrid inorganic nanostructures for nanomedicine applications, and the potential and challenges for their clinical translations. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Au nanoparticles; hybrid nanostructures; localized surface plasmon resonances; nanomedicine; theranostics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32724458 PMCID: PMC7381751 DOI: 10.7150/thno.42284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Illustration of various Au-based inorganic hybrid nanocomposites for diagnostic and therapeutic nanomedicine applications.
Summary of Au-based inorganic hybrid nanostructures used in nanomedicine
| Hybrid structure | Synthetic method | Size | Application | Advantage | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au-Cu9S5 UFO-shape | Seeded growth method | ~22 nm (TEM) | PTT-CT | Improved heating effect | 77 |
| Au-Cu2-xSe heterodimer | Seeded growth method | ~10 nm (TEM) | PA | Deep tissue imaging up to 17 mm | 78 |
| Au-Cu2-xS core-shell | Anion exchange | 85.87±10 nm (DLS) | SERS/PA-PTT | Bimodal imaging-guided PTT | 73 |
| Au-Cu9S5@MSN | Seeded growth method | 107 nm (DLS) | PTT-MRI | MRI tacking drug release | 80 |
| CuS@Cu2S@Au hollow structure | Template method | 100 nm (TEM) | PTT-chemotherapy | Photo-switchable targeting | 96 |
| Au-Cu2-xS/Se | Seeded growth method | Tunable (TEM) | N.A | N.A | 102 |
| Au@Cu2-xS/Se | Self-assembly | Tunable (TEM) | PTT-PA-CT | High photothermal conversion efficiency | 103 |
| Cubic CuS@spicky Au | Template method | 78±5 nm (DLS) | PTT-SERS | Enhanced PTT and SERS | 109 |
| Au-CuS yolk-shell structure | Template method and anion exchange | Tunable (TEM) | PTT-PDT-chemotherapy | Enhanced PTT and PDT | 110 |
| Au-Cu2-xS core-shell | Template method | 150 nm (TEM) | Chemo-PTT | Enhanced photothermal effect | 111 |
| Fe3O4@Au core-shell | Seeded growth method | 6.3 ± 0.7 nm (TEM) | Hyperthermia | Improved hyperthermia | 121 |
| Fe3O4/Au | Seeded growth method | 240 nm (TEM) | SERS-magnetic hyperthermia | Improved hyperthermia | 122 |
| Fe@Au | Nanolithography and physical vapor deposition | 40 nm (TEM) | CT, MRI, and fluorescence | Magnetically amplified photothermal therapy | 123 |
| Fe3O4/Au cluster/shell | Seeded growth method | 126±11 nm (TEM) | PTT-magnetic hyperthermia | Bimodal thermo-therapy | 124 |
| Au-Fe3O4 heterodimer | Seeded growth method | 11-14 nm (TEM) | MRI-CT | Bimodal imaging | 136 |
| Fe3O4@Au core-shell | One-pot hydrothermal | 262.7±3.06 nm (DLS) | MRI-CT | Bimodal imaging | 137 |
| Fe2O3@Au core-shell | Seeded growth method | 22.1±1.9 nm (TEM) | MRI-CT | Bimodal imaging | 138 |
| Fe3O4@SiO2@Au core-shell | Seeded growth method | 222±1.5 nm (DLS) | MRI/CT(PA) imaging | Bimodal imaging | 140 |
| Fe2O3@Au core-shell | Seeded growth method | 179 nm (DLS) | SERS-PA-MRI-PTT | Tri-modal imaging-guided PTT | 141 |
| Fe3O4@Au yolk-shell | Seeded growth method | 65 nm (TEM) | MRI-PA-PET-chemo-thermal therapy | Multimodal imaging-guided chemo-thermal therapy | 142 |
| Fe3O4@Au@mSiO2 core-shell | Seeded growth method | 10.4 ± 2.3 nm (DLS) | PTT-PDT | Enhanced PDT | 143 |
| Au-Fe3O4 heterodimer | Seeded growth method | 16.7 ± 2.3 nm (TEM) | X-ray protection and X-ray enhancing agents | Discriminate healthy cell and cancer cell | 144 |
| MSN-Au-Fe3O4 core-shell | Assembly | 140 nm (TEM) | Nanozyme | Nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reaction | 145 |
| Au@MnO2 core-shell | Seeded growth method | 50 nm (TEM) | Radiotherapy | Overcoming the hypoxia-associated radiotherapy resistance | 158 |
| Au cage@MnO2 core-shell | Seeded growth method | 91 nm (TEM) | PDT | Boost immunogenic PDT | 159 |
| Cu2-xSe (Au)@MnO2 core-shell | Seeded growth method | 60 nm (TEM) | PTT | Redox-activated MRI-guided PTT | 162 |
| Au@MnO2 UFO-shaped | Seeded growth method | 230 nm (TEM) | Dark field imaging | Monitoring cell membrane vesiculation | 163 |
| Au@MnO2 core-shell | Bio-templated method | 20-25 nm (TEM) | Fluorometric and MRI based sensing | Inherent cross-validation | 164 |
Abbreviations: PTT: photothermal therapy; PDT: photodynamic therapy; PA: photoacoustic imaging; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SERS: surface enhanced Raman scattering; MSN: mesoporous silica nanoparticle; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; DLS: dynamic light scattering.
Figure 2(A) Molar extinction coefficient of Au-Cu9S5 hybrid nanostructures and corresponding Au and Cu9S5 NPs. (B) Temperature increment of Au-Cu9S5 hybrid nanostructures compared to the physical mixture of Au and Cu9S5 NPs at the same concentrations. (C) Comparison of temperature changes captured by a thermal imaging camera from Au-Cu9S5 hybrids and the physical mixture of Au and Cu9S5 NPs under laser irradiation. (D) Representative thermal images of tumor-bearing mice under the irradiation of 1064 nm laser (0.6 W cm-2). Images are reproduced with permission from 77, copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3(A) UV-vis spectra of Au-Cu2-xSe heterodimers and the 4.6 nm Au seed NPs. (B) Representative PA imaging of sentinel lymph node before (b1) and after Au-Cu2-xSe injection for 68 min (b2) and 251 min (b3), and the depth-encoded PA coronal image (b4). Images are reproduced with permission from 78, copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of endogenous H2S-triggered enhanced PA imaging and photothermal therapy based on LSPR coupling effect. (D) In situ sulfidation of Au@Cu2O nanocomposites and the corresponding PA images before and after intratumoral injection of Au@Cu2O nanostructures at different time points. Images are reproduced with permission from 81, copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 4Schematic illustration of Au-Cu9S5@MSN nanostructures (A) and their NIR responsive drug release behavior with real time MRI monitoring property (B). (C) DOX release from Au-Cu9S5@MSN-DOX nanocomposites at 45 °C, and the corresponding T1 relaxation increment. (D) Evolving T1-weighted MR images and MR relaxations of cancer cells treated with Au-Cu9S5-DOX nanocomposites after different repetition of NIR irradiations. (E) T1-weighted MR images of mice injected with Au-Cu9S5-DOX nanocomposites with and without laser irradiation treatments. Images are reproduced with permission from 80, copyright 2019 Springer Nature.
Figure 5(A) Schematic illustration of Fe2O3@Au core-shell nanoflowers for multimodal imaging-guided tumor therapy. (B) Typical TEM image of Fe2O3@Au nanoflower structures. In vivo SERS spectra (C) from normal tissue (a) and tumor region (b), T2-weighted MR images (D), and PA images (E) of a 4T1 tumor bearing mouse injected with either Fe2O3@Au nanoflowers or PBS. Images are reproduced with permission from 141, copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 6(A) Representative TEM images of assembled Fe3O4-Au janus structures (a1) after being incubated in acidic solution (pH=5.4) for 30 (a2), 60 (a3), and 90 min (a4). (B) Representative fluorescence images of tumor cells incubated with Fe3O4-Au-DOX nanocomposites at different time intervals. (C) Quantification of released DOX by measuring its fluorescence signals. Images are reproduced with permission from 79, copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7Interactions of the UFO-shaped 2D Au-MnO2 nanostructures with different living cells probed by dark-field images and scattering spectra: (A-E) HepG2 cells, (F-J) 3T3 cells, and (K-O) buthionine sulfoximine (a GSH inhibitor) pre-treated HepG2 cells. (D, I, N) Time-dependent λmax of the scattering spectra changes (E, J, O) after entering the cells. (P) Schematic for two different types of transmembrane processes. (Q) TEM image of UFO-shaped 2D Au-MnO2 nanostructures. Images reproduced with permission from 163, copyright 2019 John Wiley and Sons.