Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most vicious malignancies with ~56,770 new cases and 45,750 deaths in the United States in 2019 (1). It is generally considered as an incurable disease, with an unsatisfactory therapeutic outcome following general treatment methods, including surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (2). The 5-year survival rate of patients with PC diagnosed between 2008 and 2014 was only 9% in the United States, representing the lowest survival rate among all cancer types according to the American Cancer Society (1). Therefore, it is urgent to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying PC and to identify more effective therapeutic strategies and prognostic biomarkers.The human transcriptome is composed of a considerable number of protein-coding mRNAs as well as non-coding transcripts. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts >200 nucleotides in length without protein-coding ability, which possess vital roles in gene expression regulation at the epigenetic, transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (3). MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a series of small non-coding RNAs <22 nucleotides in length originating from hairpin precursors (4). miRNAs couple with the 3′-untranslated region of their target genes and decrease protein expression by inducing mRNA degradation, or by inhibiting mRNA translation (5). However, the biological and clinical roles of lncRNAs and miRNAs in PC are not thoroughly understood, and require further investigation. A common functional mechanism of lncRNAs in cancer cells is to couple with their target miRNAs, leading to silencing of downstream genes, which is generally known as the ‘competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA)’ theory (6). Construction of a ceRNA network using differentially expressed transcripts in cancer could help to identify biomarkers or therapeutic targets for PC.LINC00460, located on chromosome 13: 106376564-106378595, has been reported to promote the progression in numerous types of cancer, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (7), lung cancer (8), gastric cancer (9) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (10). However, it remains unclear whether LINC00460 is dysregulated and serves an important role in PC tumorigenesis. In the present study, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to construct a ceRNA network containing differentially expressed lncRNAs, miRNAs and mRNAs. Furthermore, tissue samples were collected and in vitro experiments were performed to validate the pivotal lncRNA predicted in the ceRNA network, LINC00460.
Materials and methods
Bioinformatic analysis
The expression profiles of mRNAs and miRNAs were obtained from the TCGA-PDAC dataset (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/) (11), which contained 146 PC and 3 normal samples. Based on the lncRNA information in the GENECODE database (https://www.gencodegenes.org/), the lncRNA expression profile was extracted from the mRNA dataset. The package ‘edgeR’ v3.28.0 (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html) of the R software v3.6.1 (https://www.r-project.org/) was utilized to screen out differentially expressed transcripts using the threshold values of |log2 fold change|>1 and P<0.05. The interactions between lncRNAs and miRNAs were predicted using miRcode (http://www.mircode.org/index.php). Three databases, including miRTarBase (http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/php/index.php), miRDB (http://mirdb.org/) and TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/), were used to predict targeted mRNAs of miRNAs. All differentially expressed mRNAs, miRNAs and lncRNAs were used to construct a ceRNA network that was visualized and modified using the Cytoscape software v3.7.0 (12). The prognostic value of lncRNAs for the overall survival of patients with PC was evaluated using a log-rank test through the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) website (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) (13).
Tissue samples
The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Anhui No. 2 Provincial People's Hospital (Hefei, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. A total of 59 patients with PC (35 males and 24 females, aged between 52 and 75 years) receiving surgical excision therapy at the aforementioned hospital, and admitted between March 2016 and December 2017, were enrolled in the present study. All patients had pathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and none of the patients received preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. All patients received standard gemcitabine-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. The last follow-up time point was July 16, 2019. The cancer and adjacent normal tissues (>1 cm from the margin of the cancer tissue) were collected from the excised surgical specimens and stored in sterile enzyme-free tubes. They were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until subsequent experimentation. The general and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were recorded using electronic health records.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA from cancer and normal tissues was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The RNA concentration and purity were measured using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RT was performed using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) at 37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 sec to obtain cDNA. The quantitative measurement of LINC00460 expression was analyzed using the Applied Biosystems 7900 system with the One-Step TB Green® PrimeScript™ PLUS RT-PCR kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) with the following thermocycling conditions: 42°C for 5 min and 95°C for 10 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The following primers were used: GAPDH forward, 5′-TCGGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTGGAGGGATCTCGCTCCT-3′; LINC00460 forward, 5′-ACAGCATGAGCCAGGACATC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAAAGCTGCAACATGCTCCC-3′. LINC00460 expression was normalized to that of GAPDH, and the relative LINC00460 expression level was determined using the 2−ΔΔCq method (14).
Cell culture and small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection
The humanPC PANC1 and SW1990 cell lines were purchased from Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd., and were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C with 5% CO2. The siRNA oligos (si-LINC00460; 5′-GUGUCAACAACCUGUUUAAUU-3′) and the negative control (si-NC; 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′) were purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. PANC1 and SW1990 cells were transfected with 100 nM siRNA using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequent experiments were conducted 48 h after siRNA transfection.
Cell viability assay
A total of 1×103 cells/well were incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h at 37°C. At the aforementioned time points, MTT was added to the culture medium to form a 0.5 mg/ml MTT solution. The spent culture medium was discarded 4 h later and replaced with 100 µl DMSO to dissolve the purple formazan. After mixing the plate gently for 10 min, the formazan crystals were dissolved. Cell viability was analyzed at a wavelength of 570 nm using the BioTek microplate reader (Agilent Technologies, Inc.).
Colony formation assay
A total of 300 cells/well were uniformly seeded into a 6-well plate. After 24 h, the medium was replaced and the cells were incubated with 2 ml culture medium for a further 2 weeks. The medium was then discarded, and the cells were washed twice with PBS. The cells were stained using Giemsa stain for 30 min at room temperature and the colony number in each well was counted manually under a light microscope (magnification, ×4).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v19.0 (IBM Corp.). Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=3). Differences in the expression levels between the cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were analyzed using a paired Student's t-test. For ≥3 groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's least significant difference post-hoc test were performed. The χ2 test was used to assess the association between LINC00460 expression and the clinicopathological features of patients with PC. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses, in which clinicopathological features (age, sex, differentiation, tumor size, lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion) served as covariates. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of LINC00460 expression. LINC00460 expression higher than the average was defined as high expression, while LINC00460 expression lower than the average was defined as low expression. Pearson correlation was applied to analyze the correlation between Ki-67 and LINC00460 expression. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Bioinformatic analysis identifies LINC00460 as a key lncRNA in PC
To identify prognostic biomarkers for PC, an integrated bioinformatics analysis was conducted using PC data from the TCGA. This analysis identified differentially expressed mRNAs (476 upregulated and 436 downregulated; Fig. 1A), miRNAs (12 upregulated and 13 downregulated; Fig. 1B) and lncRNAs (142 upregulated and 218 downregulated; Fig. 1C) in cancer tissues, compared with normal tissues. miRcode identified 18 differentially expressed lncRNAs (AC005280.1, GRIK1-AS1, AC020907.1, WT1-AS, LINC00365, COL4A2-AS2, LINC00092, SACS-AS1, MIR205HG, VIPR1-AS1, IDI2-AS1, LINC00460, TM4SF19-AS1, NEXN-AS1, EGOT, ZNF295-AS1, SYNPR-AS1 and PVT1) and seven differentially expressed lncRNA-targeted miRNAs (hsa-mir-424, hsa-mir-206, hsa-mir-503, hsa-mir-192, hsa-mir-383, hsa-mir-100 and hsa-mir-215). miRTarBase, TargetScan and the miRDB database identified 13 differentially expressed miRNA-targeted mRNAs: Chromobox 2, gap junction protein alpha 1, cell division cycle 25A, checkpoint kinase 1, cyclin D1 (CCND1), osteoclast associated Ig-like receptor, centrosomal protein 55, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D, kinesin family member 23, homeobox A10, E2F transcription factor 7, FH2 domain containing 1 and cyclin E1. Using these significantly upregulated or downregulated transcripts in PC, a ceRNA network was constructed using the Cytoscape platform (Fig. 1D). The prognostic significance of lncRNAs involved in the network was evaluated using the GEPIA platform. The results revealed that expression levels of LINC00460 (Fig. 2A), EGOT (Fig. 2B), VIPR1-AS1 (Fig. 2C) and SACS-AS1 (Fig. 2D) were significantly associated with the survival rate of patients with PC (P<0.05). Among these four prognosis-associated lncRNAs, the fold change of LINC00460 expression was the highest (3.47 times higher than the normal control; data not shown). Therefore, LINC00460 was selected as the target to be validated in the PC cohort enrolled in the present study.
Figure 1.
LINC00460 is a key lncRNA in PC according to bioinformatics analysis. Volcano plots of differentially expressed (A) mRNAs, (B) miRNAs and (C) lncRNAs in PC, compared with normal tissues. (D) Competing endogenous RNA network constructed using differentially expressed mRNAs (circles), miRNAs (hexagons) and lncRNAs (triangles) based on miRcode, miRTarBase, miRDB and TargetScan. The red and blue in the network represent upregulated and downregulated transcripts, respectively. PC, pancreatic cancer; miRNA, microRNA; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; FC, fold change.
Figure 2.
Prognostic value of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs predicted using the GEPIA website. (A) High expression levels of LINC00460 predicted poor OS of patients with PC. (B) High EGOT expression was significantly associated with poor OS in patients with PC. (C) High VIPR1-AS1 expression was associated with good OS of patients with PC. (D) High SACS-AS1 expression predicted good disease-free survival of patients with PC. Expression levels higher than the average were defined as high expression, while expression levels lower than the average were defined as low expression. PC, pancreatic cancer; OS, overall survival; GEPIA, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis; HR, hazard ratio; TPM, transcripts per million.
LINC00460 is an independent prognostic biomarker for PC
To test the results of the bioinformatic analysis, LINC00460 expression was examined in 59 paired PC and normal tissues. The expression levels of LINC00460 quantified by RT-qPCR were significantly upregulated in cancer tissues compared with those in normal tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 3A). Additionally, the Kaplan-Meier plot revealed that high LINC00460 expression predicted worse survival of patients with PC compared with low expression (P<0.05; Fig. 3B), which was consistent with the predicted result from GEPIA. LINC00460 expression and clinical parameters of patients are summarized in Table I. The expression levels of LINC00460 were statistically associated with tumor size (P<0.05), but not with age, sex, differentiation, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and tumor stage. The univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR), 0.721; 95% CI, 0.545–0.898; P<0.01], tumor size (HR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.442–0.925; P<0.01) and expression levels of LINC00460 (HR, 0.698; 95% CI, 0.433–0.916; P<0.05) were prognostic parameters for PC. Furthermore, multivariate analysis confirmed that LINC00460 expression (HR, 0.751; 95% CI, 0.518–0.993; P<0.05), tumor size (HR, 0.724; 95% CI, 0.479–0.962; P<0.05) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 0.848; 95% CI, 0.663–0.975; P<0.05) were independent prognostic biomarkers for PC (Table II).
Figure 3.
LINC00460 expression in PC tissues and its prognostic significance in 59 patients with PC. (A) Expression levels of LINC00460 were significantly increased in cancer tissues compared with those in adjacent normal tissues (P<0.001). (B) High LINC00460 expression predicted a shorter overall survival of patients with PC compared with low LINC00460 expression. (C) High LINC00460 expression was significantly associated with high Ki67 values in PC tissues (r=0.343; P<0.05). LINC00460 expression higher than the average was defined as high expression, while LINC00460 expression lower than the average was defined as low expression. PC, pancreatic cancer.
Table I.
Association between LINC00460 expression and clinical parameters of 59 patients with pancreatic cancer.
LINC00460, n
Parameters
Low expression
High expression
P-value
Age, years
0.358
≤60
12
17
>60
16
14
Sex
0.205
Male
19
16
Female
9
15
Differentiation
Well/moderate
18
14
0.141
Poor
10
17
Tumor size, cm
0.028[a]
≤4
17
10
>4
11
21
Lymph node metastasis
0.500
N0
11
14
N1
19
17
Vascular invasion
0.253
No
15
12
Yes
13
19
Stage
I–IIA
11
14
0.500
IIB-IV
19
17
P<0.05. LINC00460 expression higher than the average was defined as high expression, while LINC00460 expression lower than the average was defined as low expression.
Table II.
Univariate and multivariate analysis identifying prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Parameters
HR
95% CI
P-value
HR
95% CI
P-value
Age, years (≤60 vs. >60)
0.893
0.668–1.314
0.452
Sex (male vs. female)
1.371
0.875–1.585
0.527
Differentiation (well/moderate vs. poor)
1.065
0.881–1.242
0.468
Tumor size, cm (≤4 vs. >4)
0.640
0.442–0.925
0.007
0.724
0.479–0.962
0.012
Lymph node metastasis (N0 vs. N1)
0.721
0.545–0.898
0.005
0.848
0.663–0.975
0.020
Vascular invasion (no vs. yes)
0.855
0.710–1.245
0.496
LINC00460 expression (low vs. high)
0.698
0.433–0.916
0.022
0.751
0.518–0.993
0.039
HR, hazard ratio.
Silencing LINC00460 inhibits PC cell proliferation
The ceRNA network demonstrated that LINC00460 may act as a molecular sponge of miR-503 and further regulate CCND1, which has been recognized as an oncogene in different types of cancer (15,16). Therefore, it was hypothesized that LINC00460 may regulate PC cell proliferation. In PC tissues, high expression levels of LINC00460 were significantly associated with high Ki67 expression (r=0.343; P<0.05; Fig. 3C), which reflected the proliferative potential of cells. siRNA transfection significantly suppressed LINC00460 expression in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells (Fig. 4A). The viability of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells in the si-LINC00460 groups was significantly decreased compared with that in the si-NC and blank groups at 48 and 72 h (Fig. 4B and C). As shown in Fig. 4D, silencing LINC00460 expression notably reduced colony numbers, with statistical significance identified compared with the si-NC and blank groups (Fig. 4E). These in vitro results suggest that LINC00460 may have oncogenic ability and may regulate the proliferation of PC cells.
Figure 4.
LINC00460 knockdown reduces the proliferative capacity of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. (A) siRNA knockdown significantly decreased the expression levels of LINC00460 in PANC-1 and SW1990 cells. MTT assay revealing that suppressing LINC00460 inhibited the proliferation of (B) PANC-1 cells and (C) SW1990 cells at 48 and 72 h. (D) Representative images of cell colony formation of PANC-1 and SW1990 cells transfected with si-NC or si-LINC00460. (E) Colony numbers of the cells in the si-LINC00460 group were significantly lower than those in the si-NC group. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. si, small interfering RNA; NC, negative control; OD, optical density.
Discussion
Exploring specific biomarkers to improve survival prediction and therapeutic strategies for PC is an urgent requirement. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that lncRNAs regulate various critical biological functions, including transcription (17), RNA processing (18) and chromatin organization (19). Additionally, lncRNAs exert vital functions in the modulation of a large number of genes that regulate cancer cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis and stemness (20,21). Exploring key lncRNAs associated with pathological parameters and the survival of patients with PC may help to identify prognostic biomarkers and vital molecules involved in tumorigenesis. In the present study, a regulatory network of differentially expressed miRNAs, mRNAs and lncRNAs was constructed, which revealed potential molecular mechanisms, as well as helped to identify pivotal biomarkers for PC.The clinical and biological roles of LINC00460, which is located on the human chromosome 13q33.2, have been validated in several types of cancer. Zhang et al (22) demonstrated that LINC00460 expression is notably increased in colorectal cancer and is significantly associated with clinicopathological parameters and a shorter patient survival time; additionally, they demonstrated that LINC00460 targets the miR-939-5p/LIM domain kinase 2 axis to facilitate colorectal cancer cell progression. In glioma, LINC00460 has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in cancer tissues and cell lines, and to promote cancer cell progression by negatively regulating miR-320a (23). Additionally, a recent study reported that LINC00460 could promote breast cancer cell migration, invasion and proliferation by targeting the miR-489-5p/fibroblast growth factor 7/AKT axis (24). Notably, nicotine has been found to facilitate carcinogenesis in the bronchus by activating LINC00460 and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (25). In the present study, the prognostic value of LINC00460 in PC was first predicted using the TCGA database and was subsequently examined in a cohort of patients with PC. It was demonstrated that high expression levels of LINC00460 were associated with poor overall survival and that LINC00460 was an independent prognostic biomarker for patients with PC.It has been reported that the binding of miRNAs to lncRNAs is able to decrease miRNA levels, resulting in the overexpression of miRNA-targeted genes (26). The ceRNA PC network constructed in the present study may help to comprehensively understand the regulatory association between differentially expressed mRNAs and non-coding RNAs. Bioinformatics prediction revealed that in PC, LINC00460 was likely to couple with miR-503 to further regulate CCND1, a well-recognized oncogene that regulates the cell cycle and cellular proliferation (27,28). This prediction is in accordance with the in vitro cell experiments of the present study, which indicated that LINC00460 modulated cell viability in PANC-1 cells.However, the current study presents several limitations. Firstly, pathological confirmation of the non-cancerous tissues was not performed, which may have led to inaccurate expression levels of LINC00460. Secondly, the bioinformatics prediction of the ceRNA network was not confirmed by in vitro experiments. Thirdly, LINC00460 expression was only evaluated in association with disease-free survival, and no follow-up of the enrolled patients was conducted for overall survival analysis.In summary, the present study identified LINC00460 as an independent prognostic biomarker for PC and suggests that it may serve as an oncogenic lncRNA that promotes PC cell proliferation. Further in depth exploration is required to reveal the specific mechanism of LINC00460 in PC cells.
Authors: Mireya Cisneros-Villanueva; Lizbett Hidalgo-Pérez; Alberto Cedro-Tanda; Mónica Peña-Luna; Marco Antonio Mancera-Rodríguez; Eduardo Hurtado-Cordova; Irene Rivera-Salgado; Alejandro Martínez-Aguirre; Silvia Jiménez-Morales; Luis Alberto Alfaro-Ruiz; Rocío Arellano-Llamas; Alberto Tenorio-Torres; Carlos Domínguez-Reyes; Felipe Villegas-Carlos; Magdalena Ríos-Romero; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 6.244