Literature DB >> 32723845

ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study.

Stig Borbjerg Laursen1,2, Kathryn Oakland3, Loren Laine4, Vered Bieber5, Riccardo Marmo6, Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo7, Harry R Dalton8, Jeffrey Ngu9, Michael Schultz10,11, Marco Soncini12, Ian Gralnek5, Vipul Jairath13, Iain A Murray8, Adrian J Stanley14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Existing scores are not accurate at predicting mortality in upper (UGIB) and lower (LGIB) gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to develop and validate a new pre-endoscopy score for predicting mortality in both UGIB and LGIB. DESIGN AND
SETTING: International cohort study. Patients presenting to hospital with UGIB at six international centres were used to develop a risk score for predicting mortality using regression analyses. The score's performance in UGIB and LGIB was externally validated and compared with existing scores using four international datasets. We calculated areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs), sensitivities, specificities and outcome among patients classified as low risk and high risk. PARTICIPANTS AND
RESULTS: We included 3012 UGIB patients in the development cohort, and 4019 UGIB and 2336 LGIB patients in the validation cohorts. Age, Blood tests and Comorbidities (ABC) score was closer associated with mortality in UGIB and LGIB (AUROCs: 0.81-84) than existing scores (AUROCs: 0.65-0.75; p≤0.02). In UGIB, patients with low ABC score (≤3), medium ABC score (4-7) and high ABC score (≥8) had 30-day mortality rates of 1.0%, 7.0% and 25%, respectively. Patients classified low risk using ABC score had lower mortality than those classified low risk with AIMS65 (threshold ≤1) (1.0 vs 4.5%; p<0.001). In LGIB, patients with low, medium and high ABC scores had in-hospital mortality rates of 0.6%, 6.3% and 18%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous scores, ABC score has good performance for predicting mortality in both UGIB and LGIB, allowing early identification and targeted management of patients at high or low risk of death. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastrointestinal bleeding

Year:  2020        PMID: 32723845     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Xiaoming Zhang; Joseph Harold Walline; Xuezhong Yu; Huadong Zhu
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2021-06-16

2.  Validation of the new ABC score for predicting 30-day mortality in gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Marie Christelle Saade; Anthony Kerbage; Suha Jabak; Maha Makki; Kassem Barada; Yasser Shaib
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Somatostatin plus Gastroscopic Administration of Omeprazole for the Treatment of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Exploration of a Promising Alternative.

Authors:  Lu Feng; Jing Fu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Comparison of Risk Scores for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Majed Almaghrabi; Mandark Gandhi; Leonardo Guizzetti; Alla Iansavichene; Brian Yan; Aze Wilson; Kathryn Oakland; Vipul Jairath; Michael Sey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Usefulness of the CHAMPS score for risk stratification in lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Munehiko Tajika; Tamotsu Matsuhashi; Yosuke Shimodaira; Sho Fukuda; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Kae Sugawara; Youhei Saruta; Yasutaka Takahashi; Kenta Watanabe; Katsunori Iijima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Mingyang Song; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Nursing Value Analysis and Risk Assessment of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Multiagent Reinforcement Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Xiaoli Liu; Changyou Yin; Hongrong Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Validation and modification of existing mortality prediction models for lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hyun Seok Lee; Hee Seok Moon; In Sun Kwon; Hyun Yong Jeong; Byung Seok Lee; Seok Hyun Kim; Eaum-Seok Lee; Jae Kyu Sung; Sun Hyung Kang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Yajie Li; Qin Lu; Kexuan Wu; Xilong Ou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Trends in hospitalization, mortality, and timing of colonoscopy in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Kalpit Devani; Dhruvil Radadiya; Paris Charilaou; Tyler Aasen; Chakradhar M Reddy; Mark Young; Bhaumik Brahmbhatt; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.