| Literature DB >> 32722995 |
Vasko Graklanov1, Veselin Popov2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate serum vitamin D levels in patients newly diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (NHL-DLBCL), multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured serum levels of vitamin D by ELISA in 103 patients prior to initiation of treatment, of whom 37 were diagnosed with MM, 32 with CLL and 34 with NHL-DLBCL.Entities:
Keywords: Vitamin D; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; multiple myeloma; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; serum biomarkers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722995 PMCID: PMC7391438 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520943421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Diagnostic levels of vitamin D.
| 1,25(OH)2D level (ng/mL) | 1,25(OH)2D level (nmol/L) | Laboratory diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| <10 | <25 | Severe deficiency |
| <20 | <50 | Deficiency |
| 20–30 | 50 | Insufficiency |
| 30–100 | 75 | Normal in sunny countries |
| >100 | >250 | Excess |
| >150 | >325 | Intoxication |
Patient characteristics.
|
| ||
| | Female | 51.4% |
| Male | 48.6% | |
|
| 68 years (38–86 years) | |
| | IA | 10.8% |
| IB | 0% | |
| IIA | 13.5% | |
| IIB | 5.4% | |
| IIIA | 18.9% | |
| | I | 13.5% |
| II | 13.5% | |
| III | 70.0% | |
|
| ||
| | Female | 47.1% |
| Male | 52.9% | |
| | 60.4 years (38–82 years) | |
| | IA | 11.8% |
| IB | 2.9% | |
| IIA | 8.8% | |
| IIB | 11.8% | |
| IIBs | 2.9% | |
| IIIA | 8.8% | |
| IIIB | 23.5% | |
| IIIBs | 2.9% | |
| IVB | 14.7% | |
| | Yes | 44.1% |
| No | 55.9% | |
| | Yes | 41.3% |
| No | 58.7% | |
|
| ||
| | Female | 34.4% |
| Male | 65.6% | |
| | 68 years (45–90 years) | |
| | 0 | 3.1% |
| I | 43.8% | |
| II | 37.5% | |
| III | 6.3% | |
| IV | 9.4% | |
| | A | 62.5% |
| B | 25.0% | |
| C | 12.5% |
Figure 1.Level of vitamin D in all patients.
Figure 2.Distribution of patients with NHL-DLBCL according vitamin D level.
Figure 3.Distribution of patients with CLL according to vitamin D level.
Figure 4.Distribution of patients with MM according to vitamin D level.