| Literature DB >> 32722352 |
Federica Flamminii1, Carla Daniela Di Mattia1, Giampiero Sacchetti1, Lilia Neri1, Dino Mastrocola1, Paola Pittia1.
Abstract
This work aimed to study the physical, structural, and sensory properties of a traditional full-fat mayonnaise (≈ 80% oil) enriched with an olive leaf phenolic extract, added as either free extract or encapsulated in alginate/pectin microparticles. Physical characterization of the mayonnaise samples was investigated by particle size, viscosity, lubricant properties, and color; a sensory profile was also developed by a quantitative descriptive analysis. The addition of the extract improved the dispersion degree of samples, especially when the olive leaf extract-loaded alginate/pectin microparticles were used. The encapsulated extract affected, in turn, the viscosity and lubricant properties. In particular, both of the enriched samples showed a lower spreadability and a higher salty and bitter perception, leading to a reduced overall acceptability. The results of this study could contribute to understanding the effects of the enrichment of emulsified food systems with olive by-product phenolic extracts, both as free and encapsulated forms, in order to enhance real applications of research outcomes for the design and development of healthy and functional formulated foods.Entities:
Keywords: alginate/pectin beads; encapsulation; food enrichment; functional food; mayonnaise; olive leaf polyphenols; phenolic extract
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722352 PMCID: PMC7466192 DOI: 10.3390/foods9080997
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Particle size parameters of mayonnaise samples after preparation, as affected by olive leaf phenolic extract (OLE) and alginate/pectin (Alg/Pec) + OLE enrichment.
| D [4;3] | D [3;2] | SSA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.7 ± 0.7 a | 1.9 ± 0.2 a | 3270 ± 408 c |
| Mayo + OLE | 2.1 ± 0.0 b | 1.7 ± 0.0 b | 3663 ± 59 b |
| Mayo + Alg/Pec | 1.8 ± 0.0 b | 1.5 ± 0.0 c | 4272 ± 9 a |
Values are means ± SD. Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Particle size distribution curves of the differently enriched mayonnaise samples after preparation.
Figure 2Optical micrograph images of mayonnaise samples just after preparation. Control (a), Mayo + OLE (b), and Mayo + Alg/Pec (c).
Figure 3Color properties in terms of the lightness (L*) and hue angle (h°) of the mayonnaise samples under investigation. Different letters for parameters are significantly different by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Flow curves of the mayonnaise after preparation.
Herschel–Bulkley viscosity parameters of the mayonnaise samples.
| τ0 (Pa) |
| K (Pa sn) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 78.8 b | 0.3 b | 71.3 a |
| Mayo + OLE | 136.1 a,b | 0.5 a,b | 21 b |
| Mayo + Alg/Pec | 171.4 a | 0.7 a | 11.4 c |
Values are the median ± SD. The flow parameters are the yield stress τ0 (Pa), consistency index K (Pa sn), and flow index n. Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Stribeck curves of mayonnaise samples.
Figure 6Spider plot of specific sensory attributes of the mayonnaise formulations. Lowercase letters for each attribute indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).