| Literature DB >> 32722149 |
Dmitry V Saveliev1, Inna A Belyaeva2, Dmitry V Chashin1, Leonid Y Fetisov1, Dirk Romeis3, Wolfgang Kettl2, Elena Yu Kramarenko4,5, Marina Saphiannikova3, Gennady V Stepanov4,6, Mikhail Shamonin2.
Abstract
Elongations of magnetoactive elastomers (MAEs) under ascending-descending uniform magnetic fields were studied experimentally using a laboratory apparatus specifically designed to measure large extensional strains (up to 20%) in compliant MAEs. In the literature, such a phenomenon is usually denoted as giant magnetostriction. The synthesized cylindrical MAE samples were based on polydimethylsiloxane matrices filled with micrometer-sized particles of carbonyl iron. The impact of both the macroscopic shape factor of the samples and their magneto-mechanical characteristics were evaluated. For this purpose, the aspect ratio of the MAE cylindrical samples, the concentration of magnetic particles in MAEs and the effective shear modulus were systematically varied. It was shown that the magnetically induced elongation of MAE cylinders in the maximum magnetic field of about 400 kA/m, applied along the cylinder axis, grew with the increasing aspect ratio. The effect of the sample composition is discussed in terms of magnetic filler rearrangements in magnetic fields and the observed experimental tendencies are rationalized by simple theoretical estimates. The obtained results can be used for the design of new smart materials with magnetic-field-controlled deformation properties, e.g., for soft robotics.Entities:
Keywords: extensional strain; hysteresis; magnetoactive elastomer; magnetodeformation; magnetomechanical effect; magnetostriction
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722149 PMCID: PMC7435617 DOI: 10.3390/ma13153297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Proportions of individual components for fabrication of the MAE samples in mass percent.
| Samples | CIP | AK 10 | VS 100000 | MV 2000 | Cross-linker 210 | Pt Catalyst | Inhibitor | Modifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70-30-X | 69.769 | 19.914 | 8.448 | 1.509 | 0.179 | 0.010 | 0.050 | 0.030 |
| 75-30-X | 74.801 | 16.606 | 7.045 | 1.258 | 0.141 | 0.083 | 0.042 | 0.025 |
| 80-30-X | 79.835 | 13.292 | 5.639 | 1.007 | 0.106 | 0.067 | 0.033 | 0.020 |
| 80-50-X | 79.822 | 13.290 | 5.638 | 1.007 | 0.123 | 0.066 | 0.033 | 0.020 |
| 80-120-X | 79.806 | 11.386 | 7.246 | 1.294 | 0.143 | 0.067 | 0.033 | 0.026 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for measuring the extensional strain of MAE cylinders: (a) three-dimensional view; and (b) top view. (1) Electromagnetic coils; (2) Magnetic field sensor; (3) MAE cylinder; (4) pivot point with bearings on a stand; (5) non-magnetic lever; (6) digital indicator with a shaft; and (7) electromagnet poles. The magnetically soft iron yoke is not drawn for clarity of the figures. denotes the gravity vector.
Figure 2(a) Photograph of a sample with dimensions. (b) The engineering normal strain as a function of the applied magnetic field . The arrows denote the direction of the field change.
Measurement results for MAE samples with the shear modulus of about 30 kPa.
| Sample | 70-30-S | 70-30-M | 70-30-T | 75-30-S | 75-30-M | 75-30-T | 80-30-S | 80-30-M | 80-30-T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 70 | 70 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 80 | 80 | 80 | |
| 14.9 | 15.2 | 14.8 | 14.8 | 14.9 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 14.7 | 14.7 | |
| 4.4 | 7.4 | 10.7 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 5.4 | 7.2 | 10.0 | |
| 0.30 | 0.49 | 0.72 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.68 | |
| 88 | 64 | 32 | 103 | 72 | 56 | 56 | 48 | 40 | |
|
| 0.068 | 0.09 | 0.089 | 0.078 | 0.137 | 0.146 | 0.12 | 0.139 | 0.143 |
| 231 | 239 | 271 | 127 | 159 | 179 | 119 | 111 | 151 | |
|
| 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.0117 |
Measurement results for MAE cylinders with 80 mass% of carbonyl iron.
| Sample | 80-30-S | 80-30-M | 80-30-T | 80-50-S | 80-50-M | 80-50-T | 80-120-S | 80-120-M | 80-120-T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | |
| 14.5 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.8 | 14.7 | 15.2 | 14.9 | 15.0 | |
| 5.4 | 7.2 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 9.8 | 4.9 | 7.9 | 10.0 | |
|
| 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.67 |
| 56 | 48 | 40 | 64 | 48 | 40 | 95 | 64 | 48 | |
|
| 0.120 | 0.139 | 0.143 | 0.119 | 0.132 | 0.141 | 0.057 | 0.070 | 0.076 |
| 119 | 111 | 151 | 159 | 151 | 159 | 207 | 215 | 199 | |
|
| 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.0117 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.012 |
Figure 3(a) Field dependence of the engineering normal strain of MAE samples with 80 mass% of iron and the quiescent shear modulus of 120 kPa for different aspect ratios. (b) Dependence of the maximum strain on the aspect ratio for different samples.
Figure 4Comparison of experimental and theoretical results obtained in [39] with similar experimental observations in the present work.
Figure 5(a) Field dependence of the engineering normal strain of MAE samples with 80 mass% of iron and the middle aspect ratio on the shear modulus of the composite material. (b) Dependence of the maximum strain on the shear modulus for varied aspect ratio .
Figure 6(a) Field dependence of the engineering normal strain of MAE samples with the shear modulus of 30 kPa and the aspect ratio of ≈ 0.37. (b) Dependence of the maximum strain on the mass fraction of iron particles for different aspect ratios for materials with the same shear modulus of 30 kPa.
Figure 7(a) Dependence of the threshold field on the aspect ratio for different MAE samples. (b) Dependence of the threshold field on the shear modulus for the fixed iron content of 80 mass% and varied aspect ratio .
Figure 8Theoretical dependence of the normalized threshold field on the aspect ratio . (a) The derivative =0 is fixed. The red dashed curves show the role of sign of at . Other colors designate varying content of iron particles in samples with identical . (b) mass% is constant. Solid lines correspond to different at fixed . The dashed curve illustrates the influence of combined positive and negative in Equation (5).
Figure 9Comparison of the magnetostrictive strain of an anisotropic sample with 80 mass% of iron with the corresponding isotropic sample showing the largest magnetostrictive strain.