| Literature DB >> 32722107 |
Mohammad R Irshidat1, Nasser Al-Nuaimi1.
Abstract
This paper experimentally investigates the effect of utilization of carbon dust generated as an industrial waste from aluminum factories in cementitious composites production. Carbon dust is collected, characterized, and then used to partially replace cement particles in cement mortar production. The effect of adding different dosages of carbon dust in the range of 5% to 40% by weight of cement on compressive strength, microstructure, and chemical composition of cement mortar is investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis are used to justify the results. Experimental results show that incorporation of carbon dust in cement mortar production not only reduces its environmental side effects but also enhances the strength of cementitious composites. Up to 10% carbon dust by weight of cement can be added to the mixture without adversely affecting the strength of the mortar. Any further addition of carbon dust would decrease the strength. Best enhancement in compressive strength (27%) is achieved in the case of using 5% replacement ratio. SEM images show that incorporation of small amount of carbon dust (less than 10%) lead to produce denser and more compact-structure cement mortar.Entities:
Keywords: carbon dust; cement mortar; industrial waste; microstructure; strength
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722107 PMCID: PMC7436200 DOI: 10.3390/ma13153295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Constituents of cement.
| Compound Name | Content Percentage |
|---|---|
|
| 6.4% |
|
| 18.4% |
|
| 6.1% |
|
| 3.0% |
|
| 2.2% |
|
| 1.4% |
|
| 0.8% |
|
| 1.7% |
Fine aggregate properties.
| Material | Fineness Modulus | Specific Gravity | Density (kg/m3) | Water Absorption (%) | Moisture Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | 2.31 | 2.564 | 2558.3 | 1.87 | 3.00 |
Mix proportions and specimen’s designation.
| Specimen Designation | CD0 | CD5 | CD10 | CD20 | CD30 | CD40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Replacement ratio (%) | 0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| Cement (kg/m3) | 731 | 694 | 658 | 585 | 512 | 439 |
| Carbon powder (kg/m3) | 0.0 | 37 | 73 | 146 | 219 | 292 |
| Sand (kg/m3) | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 | 2010 |
| Water (kg/m3) | 355 | 355 | 355 | 355 | 355 | 355 |
Figure 1Compressive strength test setup.
Figure 2Particle size distribution of cement and carbon dust.
Figure 3SEM image of carbon dust particles.
XRF analysis of carbon dust.
| Name | Concentration (%) |
|---|---|
| Carbon | 85 |
| Iron | 7 |
| Fluoride | 4 |
| Sodium | 2.5 |
| Sulphur | 1 |
| Silicon | 0.5 |
Figure 4XRD pattern of carbon dust.
Compressive strength results.
| Specimen | CD0 | CD5 | CD10 | CD20 | CD30 | CD40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Replacement % | 0% | 5% | 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | |
| 3-day curing | Strength (MPa) | 21.6 | 34.3 | 31.7 | 28.4 | 26.3 | 24.4 |
| Standard deviation (±) | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | |
| Enhancement (%) | NA | 58.9 | 46.6 | 31.6 | 21.5 | 12.9 | |
| 7-day curing | Strength (MPa) | 36.0 | 43.5 | 36.0 | 28.2 | 27.0 | 26.5 |
| Standard deviation (±) | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.35 | 1.4 | |
| Enhancement (%) | NA | 20.8 | −0.1 | −21.8 | −24.9 | −26.4 | |
| 28-day curing | Strength (MPa) | 44.2 | 55.9 | 48.0 | 37.2 | 38.6 | 32.7 |
| Standard deviation (±) | 2.2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.8 | |
| Enhancement (%) | NA | 26.5 | 8.6 | −16.0 | −12.6 | −25.9 | |
Figure 5Compressive strength development for mortar with different replacement ratios; (a) experimental results, (b) best fit curves.
XRF analysis of mortar with carbon dust.
| Replacement Ratio | 0% | 5% | 10% | 20% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 58.5 | 62.6 | 60.1 | 52.3 |
| CaO | 31.5 | 26.3 | 29.8 | 34.5 |
| Fe2O3 | 3.3 | 4.5 | 5.9 | 3.6 |
| SO3 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 3 | 2.6 |
| Al2O3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 3.4 |
| K2O | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Na2O | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Ca/SiO2 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.66 |
Figure 6SEM images for selected mortar specimens with (a) 0% carbon dust, (b) 5% carbon dust, (c) 40% carbon dust.
Figure 7Carbon dust content versus compressive strength of mortar.