| Literature DB >> 32722095 |
V D Ambeth Kumar1, S Malathi1, Abhishek Kumar2, Prakash M3, Kalyana C Veluvolu4.
Abstract
To communicate efficiently with a prospective user, auditory interfaces are employed in mobile communication devices. Diverse sounds in different volumes are used to alert the user in various devices such as mobile phones, modern laptops and domestic appliances. These alert noises behave erroneously in dynamic noise environments, leading to major annoyances to the user. In noisy environments, as sounds can be played quietly, this leads to the improper masked rendering of the necessary information. To overcome these issues, a multi-model sensing technique is developed as a smartphone application to achieve automatic volume control in a smart phone. Based on the ambient environment, the volume is automatically controlled such that it is maintained at an appropriate level for the user. By identifying the average noise level of the ambient environment from dynamic microphone and together with the activity recognition data obtained from the inertial sensors, the automatic volume control is achieved. Experiments are conducted with five different mobile devices at various noise-level environments and different user activity states. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed application for active volume control in dynamic environments.Entities:
Keywords: decibel value; multisensing; sensor introduction; signal; social network; volume
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722095 PMCID: PMC7435858 DOI: 10.3390/s20154117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Block diagram for volume control using multisensors.
Figure 2Proposed framework for automatic volume control.
Figure 3Calibration dialog window.
Figure 4Minimum and maximum selector.
Figure 5Start time and end time. (a) Start time (b) Stop time.
Figure 6Decibel value of calibration process for (a) Living room; (b) residential area; (c) library.
Figure 7Volume level for selected sets.
Figure 8Volume selection for 10-decibel-level inputs.
Figure 9Volume selection for 20-decibel-level inputs.
Figure 10Volume selection for 30-decibel-level inputs.
Figure 11Test case three-axis outputs for various activities.
Comparison of the proposed system with existing systems.
| Application | Automatic | Calibrate | Sound Level | Set Profile Based | Dynamic Volume Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume control [ | No | No | Yes, not automatic | No | Yes |
| Smart volume control [ | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Sound assistant [ | No | No | Yes, not automatic | No | Yes |
| Eric Qing Li [ | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| Alex Boudreau [ | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Kenneth Louis Herman [ | No | No | No | No | No |
| Proposed method | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Figure 12Volume selection during tilting.
Figure 13Average Level below 10.
Figure 14Average level below 20.
Figure 15Average level below 40.