| Literature DB >> 32720545 |
Mohamed A Safwat1, Heba F Mansour2, Amal K Hussein2, Soha Abdelwahab3,4, Ghareb M Soliman5,6.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prepare triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-loaded poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PEG-b-PCL) and poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(lactic acid) (PEG-b-PLA) micelles as a potential treatment of ocular inflammation. The micelles were evaluated for particle size, drug loading capacity and drug release kinetics. Selected micellar formulations were dispersed into chitosan hydrogel and their anti-inflammatory properties were tested in rabbits using a carrageenan-induced ocular inflammatory model. Particle size ranged from 59.44 ± 0.15 to 64.26 ± 0.55 nm for PEG-b-PCL and from 136.10 ± 1.57 to 176.80 ± 2.25 nm for PEG-b-PLA micelles, respectively. The drug loading capacity was in the range of 6-12% and 15-25% for PEG-b-PCL and PEG-b-PLA micelles, respectively and was dependent on the drug/polymer weight ratio. TA aqueous solubility was increased by 5- and 10-fold after loading into PEG-b-PCL and PEG-b-PLA micelles at a polymer concentration as low as 0.5 mg/mL, respectively. PEG-b-PLA micelles suspended in chitosan hydrogel were able to sustain the drug release where only 42.8 ± 1.6% drug was released in one week. TA/PEG-b-PLA micelles suspended in chitosan hydrogel had better anti-inflammatory effects compared with the plain drug hydrogel or the drug micellar solution. Complete disappearance of the corneal inflammatory changes was observed for the micellar hydrogel. These results confirm the potential of PEG-b-PLA micelles suspended in chitosan hydrogel to enhance the anti-inflammatory properties of triamcinolone acetonide.Entities:
Keywords: Triamcinolone acetonide; chitosan; ocular inflammation; ploy(lactic acid); poly(caprolactone); polymeric micelles
Year: 2020 PMID: 32720545 PMCID: PMC7470058 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1797241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.Distribution of the hydrodynamic diameter of (A) blank PEG2-b-PCL10 micelles, (B) blank PEG2-b-PLA1 micelles (solvent: deionized water; polymer concentration: 0.5 mg/mL).
Hydrodynamic diameter (D) and polydispersity index (PDI) of TA-loaded micelles.
| TA/polymer ratio (wt.%) | PEG2- | PEG2- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | PDI | D | PDI | |
| 0 | 59.44 ± 0.15 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 142.43 ± 2.21 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| 10 | 59.36 ± 0.14 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 136.10 ± 1.57 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
| 20 | 61.14 ± 0.35 | 0.22 ± 0.00 | 153.30 ± 2.01 | 0.18 ± 0.04 |
| 30 | 59.27 ± 0.78 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 176.80 ± 2.25 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
| 40 | 64.26 ± 0.55 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 146.90 ± 4.29 | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| 50 | 60.22 ± 0.71 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 148.23 ± 1.65 | 0.21 ± 0.06 |
Drug loading properties of PEG2-b-PCL10 and PEG2-b-PLA1 micelles.
| TA/polymer ratio (wt.%) | PEG2- | PEG2- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC | EE | LC | EE | |
| 10 | 6.78 ± 0.09 | 72.70 ± 1.01 | 9.97 ± 0.50 | 99.75 ± 0.48 |
| 20 | 14.06 ± 0.10 | 81.82 ± 0.05 | 15.03 ± 0.09 | 88.42 ± 0.63 |
| 30 | 12.65 ± 0.06 | 48.28 ± 0.27 | 17.07 ± 0.03 | 68.62 ± 0.13 |
| 40 | 11.45 ± 0.11 | 32.34 ± 0.34 | 25.18 ± 0.06 | 84.12 ± 0.25 |
| 50 | 11.19 ± 0.04 | 25.21 ± 0.11 | 17.82 ± 0.10 | 43.38 ± 0.28 |
aPercent drug loading capacity determined from Equation (1).
bPercent drug encapsulation efficiency determined from Equation (2).
Figure 2.Cumulative percent of TA released from different formulations in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at 37 °C.
Figure 3.(A) Photomicrograph of control normal corneal tissue showing stratified squamous non- keratinized epithelium resting on basal lamina (}). Bowman’s layer appears as acellular, condensed region of the apical stroma (blue arrow). Stroma contains keratocytes (red arrow) within the acidophilic parallel regular lamella of stromal collagen (green arrow). Endothelial cell nuclei are seen in a single layer (arrow head) beneath the Descemet’s membrane (*). (H &E × 400). (B) Photomicrographs of the corneal tissue of adult male albino rabbits 2 h after carrageenan injection showing disfigured epithelium (arrow) with inflammatory cell infiltration (arrowhead). Notice edema and disorganization of the stroma (*). (C) Stroma of the cornea 2 h after carrageenan injection showing inflammatory cell infiltration and endovascular formation (arrow). H&E scale bar 50 µm.
Figure 4.Photomicrograph of the corneal tissue of adult male albino rabbits 14 days after carrageenan injection. (A) Group I, non-treated cornea showing increase in epithelial thickness and appearance of horny superficial layer on the corneal surface (arrow), inflammatory cells could be observed in the stroma (arrowhead), as well as newly formed blood vessels (*). (B) Group II (plain drug hydrogel) showing vacuolated epithelial cells (arrow), eosinophilic cytoplasm of others (arrowhead) and stroma showing improved organization of collagen (*). (C) Group III (micellar solution) showing nearly normal epithelial pattern. Stroma showing homogenization of collagen (*). (D) Group IV (TA micelles/chitosan hydrogel) showing nearly normal appearance of the cornea with normal epithelial arrangement and normal stromal pattern. H&E scale bar 50 µm.
Figure 5.Ki-67 immunostaining of the corneal tissue of adult male albino rabbits 14 days after carrageenan injection. (A) Group I (non-treated group) showing many cells expressing ki-67 (arrow). (B) Group II (plain drug hydrogel) showing some positive cells for ki-67 (arrow). (C) Group III (micellar solution) showing few positive cells expressing ki-67 (arrow). (D) Group IV (TA micelles/chitosan hydrogel) showing that the expression of ki-67 is rare and very low (arrow) (Counter stain hematoxylin ×40).