Literature DB >> 32719376

Mutation analysis, treatment and prenatal diagnosis of Chinese cases of methylmalonic acidemia.

Chuan Zhang1,2,3, Xing Wang2, Shengju Hao2, Qinghua Zhang2, Lei Zheng2, Bingbo Zhou2, Furong Liu2, Xuan Feng2, Xue Chen2, Panpan Ma2, Cuixia Chen1,3, Zongfu Cao4,5, Xu Ma6,7.   

Abstract

Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA)-affected patients may have developmental, hematological, neurological, metabolic, ophthalmological, and dermatological clinically abnormal findings. This study aimed to identify mutations in 13 Chinese MMA cases. We provided genetic counseling, treatment, and prenatal diagnosis for the families with MMA. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed and the results were confirmed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Variant screening in probands was performed by targeted next-generation sequencing. Identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Of these 13 MMA cases, seven were isolated MMA, and among them, six were caused by variants in MMUT and one was caused by a variant in MCEE. The other six cases were MMA with homocystinuria, which was caused by variants in MMACHC. We found six novel variants in three MMA-causing genes as follows: c.2008G>A, c.301_302insTA, c.984delC, and c.319A>T of MMUT; c.445T>C of MMACHC; and c.296T>C of MCEE. We provided prenatal diagnosis for two families with MMA at their next pregnancy, and one family had a healthy newborn. In conclusion, our findings expand the spectrum of genotypes in MMA. Effective genetic counseling is required to allow awareness of the patients' families that MMA disease is treatable and a good prognosis can be obtained.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32719376      PMCID: PMC7385101          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69565-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Methylmalonic acidemia is a group of inborn errors of metabolism causing multisystem disease. MMA has two subtypes of isolated MMA and MMA with homocystinuria. Two genetic defects of deficiency of methylmalonyl CoA mutase and defects in the synthesis of the coenzyme adenosylcobalamin cause isolated MMA[1]. The worldwide estimated incidence of MMA is approximately 1/48,000–1/250,000[2]. The incidence of MMA is different among the different MMA subtypes and regions of China. The total incidence of MMA in China is approximately 1: 28,000 for MMA at birth[3], but in Shandong Province, the incidence of cobalamin (cbl) C type is approximately 1: 3,920 live births[4]. According to the age of onset, MMA can be divided into two forms as follows. In the early-onset form, patients with MMA present with symptoms within the first year. The late-onset form is rarer than the early-onset form and is easily misdiagnosed or missed. In the late-onset form, patients present with a milder clinical phenotype with acute or slowly progressive nervous system symptoms and behavioral disorders at any time from childhood to adulthood[5]. The clinical manifestations of patients with MMA are complex and varied, range in severity, and can manifest as an acute or chronic course. Severe cases of MMA and death occur in the neonatal period, and mild disease can occur in adulthood. MMA is a genetically heterogeneous disease. Isolated MMA can be caused by mutations in MMUT (OMIM, 609058), which result in deficiency of methylmalonyl CoA mutase, and this form is unresponsive to vitamin B12 therapy. Mutations in MCEE lead to deficiency of methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase, which can result in mild isolated MMA[6]. Other forms of isolated MMA are found in a subset of patients with defects in synthesizing the coenzyme adenosylcobalamin and are classified into three groups: cblA (OMIM, 251100), which is caused by mutations in MMAA (OMIM, 607481); cblB (OMIM, 251110), which is caused by mutations in MMAB (OMIM, 607568)[7]; and cb1D variant 2, which is caused by mutations in MMADHC (OMIM, 611935). The finding of biallelic pathogenic variants in one of the five genes (MMUT, MMAA, MMAB, MCEE, and MMADHC) associated with isolated MMA with confirmation of carrier status in the parents can establish the diagnosis of MMA. Approximately 97% of isolated MMA cases were caused by mutations in MMUT, MMAA, and MMAB, and mutations in MCEE and MMADHC only account for approximately 1–3%[6,8]. MMA with homocystinuria can be found in the following complementation groups: cblC (OMIM, 277400), which is caused by mutations in MMACHC (OMIM, 609831); cblD (OMIM, 277410), which is caused by mutations in MMADHC (OMIM, 611935); and cblF (OMIM, 277380), which is caused by mutations in LMBRD1 (OMIM, 612625)[9]. In our study, we recruited 13 unrelated patients with MMA and studied the clinical, biochemical, and hereditary pathogenesis of these patients. We performed accurate genetic metabolic disease screening, molecular diagnosis, and genetic counseling for these families. We provided invasive prenatal diagnosis for two families and followed up their pregnancy results.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 13 unrelated patients with MMA (seven with isolated MMA and six with MMA with homocystinuria) and their families were recruited. The patients were from Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital during November 2016 to May 2019. The age of the probands ranged from 1 day to 5 years old. All patients were from non-consanguineous families. This study was performed according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (No. 4 of the hospital ethics review, 2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study, and written informed consent of patients younger than 18 years old was obtained from their parents.

Methods

Genetic metabolic disease screening

We collected dried blood spots (in whole blood) of the probands. Blood amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitines were measured by using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) (TQD; Waters, USA). The reference levels of propionylcarnitine (C3) and C3/acetylcarnitine (C2) in the blood were 0.3–4.95 μmol/L and 0.05–0.27 μmol/L, respectively. Concentrations of organic acids in urine were measured by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (GCMS-QP 2010; Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) in these patients. The normal value of urine methylmalonic acid ranges from 0.0–5.34 μmol/L.

Treatment and follow up

Metabolic therapy, including a high-calorie diet with special formula supplementation (no isoleucine, threonine, methionine, and valine), stopping protein intake and intramuscular cobalamin were provided to most patients. Treatment for the patients was then adjusted according to their response to vitamin B12 and other individual conditions[7,10-12]. Two families had an invasive prenatal diagnosis during 19–20 weeks of pregnancy. We obtained 15 ml of amniotic fluid and then used Sanger sequencing to detect the same mutations as those found in the probands.

Genomic DNA preparation

A total of 2–3 ml of blood samples were collected from the probands and their parents. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Tiangen Biotech DNA extraction kit (Beijing, China).

Targeted next generation sequencing and Sanger Sequencing

Mutation screening for the probands was performed by targeted gene capturing and sequencing of 175 related genes by MyGenostics Corporation (MyGenostics GenCap Enrichment Technologies, Beijing, China).The list of genes is shown in Table S1. Candidate variants were confirmed in the parents in each family by Sanger sequencing. Primers for polymerase chain reaction were designed by Primer3 Input (v.0.4.0, https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) (Table S2). Amplification conditions for Sanger sequencing are shown in Table S2. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI 3500DX Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Bioinformatics analysis

The variants were described according to the nomenclature recommended by the Human Genomic Variation Society. Novel variants were checked in the Human Gene Variant Database (HGMD) (https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/) and ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). We used PolyPhen2 (https://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2) and PROVEAN (https://provean.jcvi.org/index.php) tools to predict the possible functional role of novel variants. InterVar software (https://wintervar.wglab.org/) was used to evaluate the pathogenicity of the novel variants with reference to the standards and guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)[13]. This process has been described previously[14,15].

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (No. 4 of hospital ethics review, 2016). Written informed consents have been obtained from all participants the study procedure started.

Result

Clinical features, biochemical indicators and variant analysis

Our 13 MMA cases from 13 unrelated families were recruited from the genetic counseling clinic and the neonatal intensive care unit of Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. Two of the patients had the late-onset form (> 1 year old) and 11 had the early-onset form (< 1 year old). The clinical features and biochemical indicators are shown in Table 1. Seven of the cases were isolated MMA and six were MMA with homocystinuria.
Table 1

Novel mutations of MUT, MMACHC and MCEE.

GeneNucleotide changeAmino acid ChangePolyPhen2 result (Score)PROVEN result (Score)PathogenicityEvidence
MUTc.2008G>Ap.G670SPD (1.000)D (− 5.850)LPPM1 PM2 PM5 PP3
c.301_302insTAp.T101Ifs*80NANAPPVS1, PS2 and PM2
c.984delCp.W329Gfs*4NANAPPVS1, PS2 and PM2
c.319A>Tp.I107FPD (1.000)D (− 3.950)LPPM1 PM2 PP3 PP4
MMACHCc.445T>Cp.C149RPD (0.884)D (− 7.990)PPM1 PM2 PP3 PP4
MCEEc.296T>Cp.L99PPD (1.000)D (− 6.950)LPPM1 PM2 PP3 PP4

PD Probably Damaging, D Deleterious, P Pathogenic, LP Likely pathogenic.PolyPhen2 result: The score is closer to 1, the damaging will be more strong; Proven Result: Variants with a score equal to or below − 2.5 are considered “deleterious”, Variants with a score above − 2.5 are considered “neutral”. The type of evidence refers to. ACMG/AMP 2015 guideline (https://wintervar.wglab.org/).

Novel mutations of MUT, MMACHC and MCEE. PD Probably Damaging, D Deleterious, P Pathogenic, LP Likely pathogenic.PolyPhen2 result: The score is closer to 1, the damaging will be more strong; Proven Result: Variants with a score equal to or below − 2.5 are considered “deleterious”, Variants with a score above − 2.5 are considered “neutral”. The type of evidence refers to. ACMG/AMP 2015 guideline (https://wintervar.wglab.org/). Variants in MMUT: MMA was caused by a homozygous variant in one patient and MMA was caused by compound heterozygous variants in MMUT in five patients. Eleven different variants of MMUT were identified in these six patients (Table 2). Eight were missense variants and three were frame-shift variants. Seven of the variants were previously reported[11,16-20] and four variants, c.2008G>A (p.G670S), c.301_302insTA(p.T101Ifs*80), c.984delC (p.W329Gfs*4), and c.319A>T(p.I107F), were not been previously reported in the HGMD and ClinVar databases (Table 2, Fig. 1).
Table 2

Results of DQ/IQ tests of the 5 patients.

Case NoAge at testDQFull-scale IQ
Gross motorFine motorLanguageAdaptabilityPersonal-social
22Ys/5Ys756968636462
78Mons7263786259
85Ys/7Ys/////54/48
93Ys7875727769
1310Mons/2Ys68/7695/6195/6195/6095/61

Mon month, D day, Y Year.

Figure 1

Novel variants of MMUT, MMACHC, MCEE.

Results of DQ/IQ tests of the 5 patients. Mon month, D day, Y Year. Novel variants of MMUT, MMACHC, MCEE. Variants in MMACHC: MMA was caused by a homozygous variant in two patients and MMA was caused by a compound heterozygous variant in MMACHC in four patients. Six types of variants in MMACHC were detected in these six patients (Table 2). Two missense variants, two frame-shift variants, and two nonsense variants were identified. Among them, c.445T>C (p.C149R) was not been previously reported in the HGMD and ClinVar databases (Table 2, Fig. 1). Two families with MMA caused by variants in MMACHC chose prenatal diagnosis through amniotic fluid puncture at their next pregnancy. The fetus from family 7 had the same compound heterozygous variant detected as that in the proband, and the fetus from family 8 only had a maternal heterozygous variant and there was no paternal variant(Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Prenatal diagnosis of MMA families. P proband, F father, M mother, AF amniotic fluid.

Prenatal diagnosis of MMA families. P proband, F father, M mother, AF amniotic fluid. Variants in MCEE: One patient with MMA had the homozygous variant c.296T>C(p.L99P) in MCEE (Table 2, Fig. 1). This variant has not been previously reported. Bioinformatics analysis: We used PolyPhen2 and PROVEAN tools to predict the possible functional role of these six novel variants. According to the ACMG guidelines and InterVar software, these six novel variants were categorized as “likely pathogenic” (Table 2).

Follow up

Because of severe metabolic acidosis, eight families (numbers 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, and 12) abandoned treatment for the probands, and these patients eventually died. Family 7 provided treatment for the patient. However, the patient had a poor vitamin B12 response, and the patient died of metabolic acidosis at 11 months because of poor treatment. Patients 2 and 13 received oral L-carnitine, vitamin B12, and folate. Patients 8 and 9 received oral L-carnitine, betaine, vitamin B12, and folate (Table 3). One month later, the levels of serum C3 and C3/C2, urine MMA, and serum homocysteine (HCY) were slightly decreased. Six months later, serum C3, C3/C2, and HCY levels, and urine MMA levels of the patients were in the normal range (Table 3).
Table 3

Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, genotype information, treatment and prognosis of MMA patients in this study.

Case noAge of onsetCurr-ent ageSexBlood C3 0–1–6 month (normal: 0.3–4.95 μmol/L)Blood C3/C2 0–1–6 month (normal: 0.05–0.27)Urinary MMA 0–1–6 month (normal: 0.0–5.34 μmol/L)HCY 0–1–6 month (normal: 0.0–15.0 μmol/L)Treatment (L-carnitine, betaine, B12 and folate)Methylcobal-amin (B12) responsePrognosisGeneGenotype
114 Ds/F10.20.79391.17.5No/DeadMUTc.2008G>A /c.103C>T
22 Ys5YF12.11/2.98/2.190.7/0.23/0.09242.15/31.87/4.986.3YesEffectiveDDMUTc.301_302insTA /c.613G>A
36 Ds/M10.590.78403.594.3No/DeadMUTc.984delC/ c.984delC
41 D/M11.281.38512.33.5No/DeadMUTc.1106G>A /c.323G>A
52 Ds/M11.351.631,117.475.3No/DeadMUTc.914 T>C/ c.494A>G
61 D/M13.20.45300.462.2No/DeadMUTc.1038_1040delTCT/ c.319A>T
78 Mons/F14.830.69334.563.9NoIneffectiveDeadMMACHCc.80A>G /c.609G>A
85 Ys7YF8.87/3.35/1.271.77/0.19/0.14149.86/36.09/3.2565.4/23.2/8.9YesEffectiveDDMMACHCc.394C>T /c.658_660delAAG
956 Ds3YM8.98/3.48/2.150.84/0.21/0.18358.2/6.02/2.9862.1/52.5/6.8YesEffectiveDDMMACHCc.609G>A/ c.609G>A
1015 Ds/M10.321.01431.247.8No/DeadMMACHCc.609G>A/ c.609G>A
113 Mons/M11.640.62175.8541.1No/DeadMMACHCc.445 T>C/ c.609G>A
1240 Ds/M9.940.89331.254.3No/DeadMMACHCc.80A>G /c.567dupT
137 Mons3YF14.38/6.42/3.270.8/0.31/0.16522/81.74/3.634.9YesEffectiveDDMCEEc.296 T>C/ c.296 T>C

Mon: month; D: day; Y: Year; M: male; F: female; DD: development delay.

Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, genotype information, treatment and prognosis of MMA patients in this study. Mon: month; D: day; Y: Year; M: male; F: female; DD: development delay. The developmental quotient (DQ) was evaluated using the Revised Gesell Developmental Evaluation for children (< 4 years). This evaluation provides a developmental profile in five domains, including adaptive, gross motor, fine motor, language, and personal-social domains[9]. If the DQ of a child in any specific domain was ≤ 75[9], development was below average. The intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (> 4 years). Low intelligence was defined as an IQ score < 80[9]. We evaluated the DQ for four patients (patient numbers 2, 7, 9, 13) and the IQ for patient 8 (Table 2). The patients from families 2 and 8 were treated too late, which resulted in mental retardation and motor dysfunction. Patient 9 had a good vitamin B12 response. However, because of a lack of timely treatment, he still had a certain degree of neurodevelopmental delay. He is currently 3 years old and his language is also slightly delayed. Patient 13 achieved better treatment results, but unfortunately, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, continuous treatment was interrupted, and she is currently in a serious condition. Families 7 and 8 had prenatal diagnosis during pregnancy. The same compound heterozygous variants as those in the proband were found in the fetus of family 7, and this family stopped the pregnancy (Fig. 2). The fetus of family 8 only carried the maternal heterozygous variant (Fig. 2), and this family chose to continue the pregnancy with successful delivery.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the genetic etiology for 13 unrelated patients with MMA by using molecular testing. Six patients had MMA caused by homozygous/compound heterozygous variants in MMUT, 11 types of variants were found, and four of these variants were novel variants. Six patients had MMA caused by variants in MMACHC, six different variants were found, and c.445T>C was a novel variant. One patient had MMA caused by a novel homozygous variant, c.296T>C, in MCEE. In our study, we found the six novel variants c.2008G>A, c.301_302insTA, c.984delC, and c.319A>T in MMUT, c.445T>C in MMACHC, and c.296T>C in MCEE. By using PolyPhen2 and PROVEAN tools and InterVar software, and according to the ACMG/AMP guidelines, these six novel variants were categorized as “likely pathogenic” (Table 2). With regard to the c.2008G>A(p.G670S) variant of MMUT, the same amino acid position variant p.G670R was reported in a 7-day-old female neonate[21], but p.G670S has not been reported previously. In our study, all of the six patients with MMA with homocystinuria had variants in MMACHC. The frequency of the variants in MMACHC was associated with the genetic background of the patients. In our patients, c.609G>A was the most frequent variant (50%, 6/12), which is consistent with reports in the northern Chinese population[20]. However, the frequency of this variant is not high in the European population[22]. Lerner-Ellis et al.[22] reported that the variant c.271dupA accounted for 40% of all disease alleles in the European population, but we did not find this variant in our patients. Liu et al.[20] showed that the frequency of c.271dupA was low (1/140). The c.609G>A, c.658_660delAAG, c.482G>A, c.394C>T, and c.80A>G mutations are the most common mutations in Chinese people, and in European people, the most common mutations are c.271dupA, c.331C>T, and c.394C>T. The variant c.394C>T is common in both European and Chinese people. Lerner-Ellis et al[22] reported that the variant c.394C>T was associated with late-onset MMA. However, in Liu et al.’s study[20], eight patients carried the variant c.394C>T, and only two patients had late-onset MMA. Therefore, we consider that the variant c.394C>T is also associated with early-onset MMA. In the seven patients with isolated MMA, six were caused by variants in MMUT and one was caused by a homozygous variant in MCEE. Only approximately 21 patients with isolated MMA have been reported to have MMA caused by variants in MCEE[23-29]. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first patient with MMA caused by a variant in MCEE in Chinese people, and this was caused by the novel homozygous variant c.296T>C. We did not perform functional analysis of this novel variant at the cellular and animal levels. However, we used function prediction software to access the pathogenicity of this variant, and it was categorized as a “likely pathogenic” variant. The girl with MCEE revisited the hospital at 7 months old because of a positive LC–MS/MS result, and she had genetic diagnosis and treatment at 10 months old. During the re-examination, LC–MS/MS and GCMS indicated MMA. A comprehensive evaluation of our patient was normal. The gross motor DQ was 68, the fine motor DQ was 95, the language DQ was 95, the adaptability DQ was 95, and the personal-social DQ was 95. Oral L-carnitine and folate, and intramuscular injection of methylcobalamin led to a reduction in C3 and C3/C2 levels. Unfortunately, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient’s parents did not insist on continuous treatment, and currently, the patient is in a serious condition. Currently, the patient is 2 years old. A comprehensive evaluation of this patient showed retardation, the gross motor DQ was 76, the fine motor DQ was 61, the language DQ was 61, the adaptability DQ was 60, and the personal-social DQ was 61. Abily-Donval et al.[28] summarized the treatment prognosis of eight patients with MCEE[23-27]. After suitable treatments, growth and psychomotor development of four patients were satisfactory, and their development was normal. The other four patients also had suitable treatment, but they still had problems in psychomotor, language, and nervous system development. Because our patient discontinued treatment, unfortunately, we do not have sufficient experience for treating patients with MCEE. All of the patients with MMA were from the same Province, Gansu, which is located in the northwest of China. This region is economically insular with limited population mobility. MMA was caused by a homozygous variant in MMUT in one patient, by homozygous variants in MMACHC in two patients, and by a homozygous variant in MCEE in one patient. Although these patients were born from non-consanguineous families, we suspect that these homozygous cases might be due to a founder mutation in the local population. In recent years, an increasing number of provinces in China have carried out newborn screening for genetic metabolic disorders by using MS/MS and GC/MS. With the development of molecular diagnostic technology and a decrease in cost of tests, currently, next-generation sequencing is a more effective method of providing accurate molecular diagnosis for some rare diseases[30]. Therefore, we can provide accurate and rapid diagnosis for patients who are affected by genetic metabolic disorders. We can also provide genetic counseling for the families and prenatal diagnosis for their next child. In our study, we provided prenatal diagnosis for two families with MMA caused by variants in MMACHC. The fetus from family 7 carried the same variants as those in the proband, and this family terminated the pregnancy. Intrauterine therapy is used to treat fetuses with MMA. Trefz et al.[31] reported a patient with MMA in whom prenatal maternal treatment from week 15 of pregnancy prevented disease manifestation in a girl who is currently 11 years old with a normal IQ. However, we did not offer prenatal B12 therapy to the mother of family 7, and the pregnant woman chose to terminate the pregnancy. The fetus from family 8 only carried the maternal heterozygous variant, and this child was successfully delivered. Newborn screening at 72 h and biochemical examinations after 1 month were normal. In our 13 patients with MMA, nine (69.2%) of them were detected by newborn screening through MS/MS and GC/MS. Four (30.8%) of these patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms and biochemical examinations, including elevated serum C3 and C3/C2 levels and urine MMA levels, and MMA was confirmed by molecular testing. Unfortunately, only five patients received treatment. While four patients are currently still alive, the chance of recovery of these patients is not good.

Conclusion

We studied 13 patients with MMA from the northwest of China, and by using a molecular test, we identified their genetic etiology. We found six novel variants in three MMA-causing genes, MMUT, MMACHC, and MCEE. We provided genetic counseling for these families with MMA, and two families had prenatal diagnosis during their next pregnancy. Our findings extend the mutation spectrum of isolated MMA in the Chinese population. Newborn screening and next-generation sequencing can provide an accurate diagnosis for genetic metabolic diseases at an early age. However, more effective genetic counseling, and timely treatment and follow-up are required to make the patients’ families aware that some genetic metabolic diseases are treatable and can achieve a good prognosis. Supplementary file1 (DOC 71 kb)
  30 in total

1.  Clinical, biochemical, and molecular analysis of combined methylmalonic acidemia and hyperhomocysteinemia (cblC type) in China.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Lianshu Han; Yanling Yang; Xuefan Gu; Jun Ye; Wenjuan Qiu; Huiwen Zhang; Yafen Zhang; Xiaolan Gao; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Methylmalonic Acidemia Diagnosis by Laboratory Methods.

Authors:  Fatemeh Keyfi; Saeed Talebi; Abdol-Reza Varasteh
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-10

3.  Metabolic decompensation in methylmalonic aciduria: which biochemical parameters are discriminative?

Authors:  Tamaris Zwickler; Gisela Haege; Alina Riderer; Friederike Hörster; Georg F Hoffmann; Peter Burgard; Stefan Kölker
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Autozygosity mapping of methylmalonic acidemia associated genes by short tandem repeat markers facilitates the identification of five novel mutations in an Iranian patient cohort.

Authors:  Mehdi Shafaat; Mohammad Reza Alaee; Ali Rahmanifar; Aria Setoodeh; Maryam Razzaghy-Azar; Hamideh Bagherian; Samira Dabbagh Bagheri; Fatemeh Zafarghandi Motlagh; Mehrdad Hashemi; Maryam Abiri; Sirous Zeinali
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 5.  Cobalamin C defect: natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment.

Authors:  Diego Martinelli; Federica Deodato; Carlo Dionisi-Vici
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Clinical presentation, gene analysis and outcomes in young patients with early-treated combined methylmalonic acidemia and homocysteinemia (cblC type) in Shandong province, China.

Authors:  Bingjuan Han; Zhiyang Cao; Liping Tian; Hui Zou; Lian Yang; Weiwei Zhu; Yingxia Liu
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 7.  Perspectives on methylmalonic acidemia resulting from molecular cloning of methylmalonyl CoA mutase.

Authors:  F D Ledley
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Methylmalonic acidemia: Current status and research priorities.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhou; Yazhou Cui; Jinxiang Han
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2018-05

9.  Newborn Screening for Methylmalonic Acidemia in a Chinese Population: Molecular Genetic Confirmation and Genotype Phenotype Correlations.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Huizhong Li; Chuanxia Wang; Xiuli Wang; Maosheng Gu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Proposed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of methylmalonic and propionic acidemia.

Authors:  Matthias R Baumgartner; Friederike Hörster; Carlo Dionisi-Vici; Goknur Haliloglu; Daniela Karall; Kimberly A Chapman; Martina Huemer; Michel Hochuli; Murielle Assoun; Diana Ballhausen; Alberto Burlina; Brian Fowler; Sarah C Grünert; Stephanie Grünewald; Tomas Honzik; Begoña Merinero; Celia Pérez-Cerdá; Sabine Scholl-Bürgi; Flemming Skovby; Frits Wijburg; Anita MacDonald; Diego Martinelli; Jörn Oliver Sass; Vassili Valayannopoulos; Anupam Chakrapani
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent research on inherited metabolic diseases in children.

Authors:  Yu-Jian Li; Xuan Kan
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 2.  Review of neuropsychological outcomes in isolated methylmalonic acidemia: recommendations for assessing impact of treatments.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.655

3.  Comparing amniotic fluid mass spectrometry assays and amniocyte gene analyses for the prenatal diagnosis of methylmalonic aciduria.

Authors:  Yupeng Liu; Zhehui Chen; Lulu Kang; Ruxuan He; Jinqing Song; Yi Liu; Chunyan Shi; Junya Chen; Hui Dong; Yao Zhang; Yanyan Ma; Tongfei Wu; Qiao Wang; Yuan Ding; Xiyuan Li; Dongxiao Li; Mengqiu Li; Ying Jin; Jiong Qin; Yanling Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.