| Literature DB >> 32718229 |
Rory J Lubner1,2,3, Eric Barbarite1,2, Neil Kondamuri1,2,3, Renata M Knoll1,2, H Gregory Ota1,2, Rebecca M Lewis4, Kevin Franck4, Aaron K Remenschneider1,2,5, Elliott D Kozin1,2.
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) are a common location for patients to present with sudden hearing loss (SHL). Unfortunately, high-quality, rapid quantitative measurement of hearing loss is challenging. Herein, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of tablet-based audiometry in patients complaining of SHL. Prospective tablet-based testing was completed in the ED in patients complaining of SHL. Air conduction thresholds (ACTs) obtained via tablet-based audiometry were compared to same-day measurements with a clinical-grade audiometer. Hearing loss (HL) was defined as >20 dB ACT for any frequency. In participant-level analysis, 30+ dB HL in 3 consecutive frequencies was used to define SHL. In the ED, mobile audiogram ACTs were within 5 dB (77%) and 10 dB (89.6%) of those determined by conventional audiometry. The sensitivity and specificity for mobile audiometry to detect 3 or more consecutive thresholds with 30+ dB HL were 100% and 62.5%, respectively. Findings have implications for increasing access to high-quality audiometry.Entities:
Keywords: audiometry; hearing loss; idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss; mobile audiometry; sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Year: 2020 PMID: 32718229 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820935420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 0194-5998 Impact factor: 3.497