Literature DB >> 32717703

Association of alcohol control policies with adolescent alcohol consumption and with social inequality in adolescent alcohol consumption: A multilevel study in 33 countries and regions.

E Leal-López1, C Moreno-Maldonado2, J Inchley3, B Deforche4, T Van Havere5, J Van Damme6, T Buijs7, I Sánchez-Queija2, D Currie8, A Vieno9, B De Clercq7.   

Abstract

Background Previous research found inconsistent associations between alcohol control policies and socioeconomic inequality with adolescent drinking outcomes. This study expands the focus beyond individual associations to examine whether a combination of policies is related to socioeconomic inequality in adolescent drinking outcomes and whether this relationship varies across survey years. Methods Multilevel modelling of 4 waves of repeat cross-sectional survey data (2001/02, 2005/06, 2009/10, and 2013/14) from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study was carried out. The sample was composed of 671,084 adolescents (51% girls) aged 11, 13, and 15 (mean age=13.58; SD=1.65) from 33 European and North American countries/regions. The dependent variables were lifetime alcohol consumption, weekly alcohol consumption, and lifetime drunkenness. Independent variables were of three types: individual-level variables (age, sex, Family Affluence Scale, and the Perceived Family Wealth), time-level variable (survey year), and context-level variables (minimum legal drinking age, physical availability, advertising restrictions, a total alcohol policy index, and affordability of alcohol). Results The total alcohol policy index showed a negative relationship with both lifetime and weekly consumption. Higher affordability of alcohol was related to higher lifetime and weekly consumption and higher lifetime drunkenness. Family Affluence Scale was positively related to all three alcohol measures and Perceived Family Wealth was negatively related to lifetime drunkenness, with these associations increasing across survey years. The total alcohol policy index buffered the associations of Family Affluence Scale and Perceived Family Wealth with adolescent drinking outcomes. Conclusion A combination of alcohol control policies is more effective in reducing adolescent drinking outcomes than single policy measures. Reducing the affordability of alcohol stood out as the most successful single measure. Socioeconomic inequalities (i.e. higher alcohol consumption and drunkenness in adolescents with higher family affluence and higher drunkenness in adolescents perceiving their families to be poor) have persisted and even increased across survey years. A combined alcohol control policy can help in tackling them.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-national; Drinking; Policy; Social inequality; Trends; Young people

Year:  2020        PMID: 32717703      PMCID: PMC7762782          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  4 in total

1.  Risk factors for early use of e-cigarettes and alcohol: Dimensions and profiles of temperament.

Authors:  Sarah A Hartmann; Timothy Hayes; Matthew T Sutherland; Elisa M Trucco
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Cross-national time trends in adolescent alcohol use from 2002 to 2014.

Authors:  Eva Leal-López; Inmaculada Sánchez-Queija; Alessio Vieno; Dorothy Currie; Torbjorn Torsheim; Daria Pavlova; Concepción Moreno-Maldonado; Bart De Clercq; Michal Kalman; Joanna Inchley
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Family and contextual factors associated with licit drug use in adolescence.

Authors:  Monalisa Cesarino Gomes; Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia; Erick Tássio Barbosa Neves; Laio da Costa Dutra; Fernanda Morais Ferreira; Saul Martins Paiva
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Forecasting Frequent Alcohol Use among Adolescents in HBSC Countries: A Bayesian Framework for Making Predictions.

Authors:  Lorena Charrier; Michela Bersia; Alessio Vieno; Rosanna Irene Comoretto; Mindaugas Štelemėkas; Paola Nardone; Tibor Baška; Paola Dalmasso; Paola Berchialla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.