| Literature DB >> 32717433 |
Juan-Carlos Hernández-Boluda1, Arturo Pereira2, Alberto Alvarez-Larran3, Ana-Africa Martín4, Ana Benzaquen5, Lourdes Aguirre6, Elvira Mora7, Pedro González8, Jorge Mora9, Nieves Dorado10, Antonia Sampol11, Valentín García-Gutiérrez12, Oriana López-Godino13, María-Laura Fox14, Juan Luis Reguera15, Manuel Pérez-Encinas16, María-Jesús Pascual17, Blanca Xicoy18, Rocío Parody19, Leslie González-Pinedo20, Ignacio Español21, Alejandro Avendaño4, Juan-Gonzalo Correa3, Carlos Vallejo6, Manuel Jurado8, Irene García-Cadenas9, Santiago Osorio10, María-Antonia Durán11, Fermín Sánchez-Guijo4, Francisco Cervantes3, José-Luis Piñana7.
Abstract
Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P < .001). We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.Entities:
Keywords: Myelofibrosis; Prognostication; Risk factors; Survival; Transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32717433 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742