Diane Goéré1, Olivier Glehen2, François Quenet3, Jean-Marc Guilloit4, Jean-Marc Bereder5, Gérard Lorimier6, Emilie Thibaudeau7, Laurent Ghouti8, Amandine Pinto8, Jean-Jacques Tuech9, Reza Kianmanesh10, Michel Carretier11, Frédéric Marchal12, Catherine Arvieux13, Cécile Brigand14, Pierre Meeus15, Patrick Rat16, Sylvaine Durand-Fontanier17, Pascale Mariani18, Zaher Lakkis19, Valeria Loi20, Nicolas Pirro21, Charles Sabbagh22, Matthieu Texier23, Dominique Elias24. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: diane.goere@aphp.fr. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital de Larchet, Nice, France. 6. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France. 7. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France. 8. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Purpan, Toulouse, France. 9. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France. 10. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Robert Debré, Reims, France. 11. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. 12. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France. 13. Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital, Grenoble, France. 14. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France. 15. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 16. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital du Bocage, Dijon, France. 17. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France. 18. Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France. 19. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France. 20. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Tenon, Paris, France. 21. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital La Timone, Marseille, France. 22. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France. 23. Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. 24. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases at an early stage, before the onset of signs, could improve patient survival. We aimed to compare the survival benefit of systematic second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with surveillance, in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study in 23 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had a primary colorectal cancer with synchronous and localised colorectal peritoneal metastases removed during tumour resection, resected ovarian metastases, or a perforated tumour. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to surveillance or second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC (oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2, or oxaliplatin 300 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2, plus intravenous fluorouracil 400 mg/m2), or mitomycin-HIPEC (mitomycin 35 mg/m2) alone in case of neuropathy, after 6 months of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with no signs of disease recurrence. Randomisation was done via a web-based system, with stratification by treatment centre, nodal status, and risk factors for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Second-look surgery consisted of a complete exploration of the abdominal cavity via xyphopubic incision, and resection of all peritoneal implants if resectable. Surveillance after resection of colorectal cancer was done according to the French Guidelines. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to peritoneal or distant disease recurrence, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, analysed by intention to treat. Surgical complications were assessed in the second-look surgery group only. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01226394. FINDINGS:Between June 11, 2010, and March 31, 2015, 150 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to a treatment group (75 per group). After a median follow-up of 50·8 months (IQR 47·0-54·8), 3-year disease-free survival was 53% (95% CI 41-64) in the surveillance group versus 44% (33-56) in the second-look surgery group (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·61-1·56). No treatment-related deaths were reported. 29 (41%) of 71 patients in the second-look surgery group had grade 3-4 complications. The most common grade 3-4 complications were intra-abdominal adverse events (haemorrhage, digestive leakage) in 12 (23%) of 71 patients and haematological adverse events in 13 (18%) of 71 patients. INTERPRETATION: Systematic second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC did not improve disease-free survival compared with standard surveillance. Currently, essential surveillance of patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases appears to be adequate and effective in terms of survival outcomes. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases at an early stage, before the onset of signs, could improve patient survival. We aimed to compare the survival benefit of systematic second-look surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with surveillance, in patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study in 23 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had a primary colorectal cancer with synchronous and localised colorectal peritoneal metastases removed during tumour resection, resected ovarian metastases, or a perforated tumour. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to surveillance or second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC (oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2, or oxaliplatin 300 mg/m2 plus irinotecan 200 mg/m2, plus intravenous fluorouracil 400 mg/m2), or mitomycin-HIPEC (mitomycin 35 mg/m2) alone in case of neuropathy, after 6 months of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with no signs of disease recurrence. Randomisation was done via a web-based system, with stratification by treatment centre, nodal status, and risk factors for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Second-look surgery consisted of a complete exploration of the abdominal cavity via xyphopubic incision, and resection of all peritoneal implants if resectable. Surveillance after resection of colorectal cancer was done according to the French Guidelines. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to peritoneal or distant disease recurrence, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, analysed by intention to treat. Surgical complications were assessed in the second-look surgery group only. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01226394. FINDINGS: Between June 11, 2010, and March 31, 2015, 150 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to a treatment group (75 per group). After a median follow-up of 50·8 months (IQR 47·0-54·8), 3-year disease-free survival was 53% (95% CI 41-64) in the surveillance group versus 44% (33-56) in the second-look surgery group (hazard ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·61-1·56). No treatment-related deaths were reported. 29 (41%) of 71 patients in the second-look surgery group had grade 3-4 complications. The most common grade 3-4 complications were intra-abdominal adverse events (haemorrhage, digestive leakage) in 12 (23%) of 71 patients and haematological adverse events in 13 (18%) of 71 patients. INTERPRETATION: Systematic second-look surgery plus oxaliplatin-HIPEC did not improve disease-free survival compared with standard surveillance. Currently, essential surveillance of patients at high risk of developing colorectal peritoneal metastases appears to be adequate and effective in terms of survival outcomes. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Alexandre Brind'Amour; Mitchell Webb; Marina Parapini; Lucas Sidéris; Maja Segedi; Stephen W Chung; Stéphanie Chartier-Plante; Pierre Dubé; Charles H Scudamore; Peter T W Kim Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Michael Flood; Vignesh Narasimhan; Kasmira Wilson; Wei Mou Lim; Robert Ramsay; Michael Michael; Alexander Heriot Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Mohammad Breakeit; Daniel Liu; Adrian Cheng; Hyerim Suh; Shoma Barat; Amer Matar; Nayef Alzahrani; David L Morris Journal: In Vivo Date: 2022 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.406
Authors: Philipp Horvath; Can Yurttas; Stefan Beckert; Alfred Königsrainer; Ingmar Königsrainer Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.639