Literature DB >> 32716676

Nationwide Circumcision Trends: 2003 to 2016.

Deborah L Jacobson1, Lauren C Balmert2, Jane L Holl3, Ilina Rosoklija4, Matthew M Davis5, Emilie K Johnson6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Among some populations access to neonatal circumcision has become increasingly limited despite evidence of its benefits. This study examines national neonatal circumcision trends before and after the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for neonatal circumcision reimbursement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of boys aged 28 days or less was conducted using data from the Kids' Inpatient Database (2003 to 2016). Boys who underwent neonatal circumcision prior to discharge were compared to boys who did not. Boys with coagulopathies, penile anomalies or a history of prematurity were excluded.
RESULTS: An estimated 8,038,289 boys comprised the final cohort. Boys were primarily White (53.7%), privately insured (49.1%) and cared for at large (60.8%) teaching (49.4%) hospitals in metropolitan areas (84.1%). While 55.0% underwent circumcision prior to discharge, neonatal circumcision rates decreased significantly over time (p <0.0001). Black (68.0%) or White (66.0%) boys, boys in the highest income quartile (60.7%) and Midwestern boys (75.0%) were most likely to be circumcised. Neonatal circumcision was significantly more common among privately (64.9%) than publicly (44.6%) insured boys after controlling for demographics, region, hospital characteristics and year (p <0.0001). The odds of circumcision over time were not significantly different in the years before vs after 2012 (p=0.28).
CONCLUSIONS: Among approximately 8 million boys sampled over a 13-year period 55.0% underwent neonatal circumcision. The rate of neonatal circumcision varied widely by region, race and socioeconomic status. The finding that boys with public insurance have lower circumcision rates in all years may be related to lack of circumcision access for boys with public insurance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advisory committees; child; circumcision; insurance coverage; male; pediatrics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32716676     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey.

Authors:  Ushasi Naha; Hans C Arora; Ryan F Walton; Ilina Rosoklija; Lindsay M Skibley; Emilie K Johnson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Incidence of circumcision among insured adults in the United States.

Authors:  Behnam Nabavizadeh; Kevin D Li; Nizar Hakam; Nathan M Shaw; Michael S Leapman; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Stephen Moreton; Stefan A Bailis; Guy Cox; John N Krieger
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2022-07-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.