| Literature DB >> 32715217 |
Said Tighadouini1, Smaail Radi2,3, Mohamed El Massaoudi2, Zouhair Lakbaibi4, Marilena Ferbinteanu5, Yann Garcia6.
Abstract
A new sustainable and environmentally friendlyEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32715217 PMCID: PMC7377074 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Synthetic Pathway to the Hybrid Material SiNPz-Th
Figure 1X-ray molecular structure of L with atoms numbering scheme (L: a = 4.163(7) Å, b = 14.96(2) Å, c = 19.62(3) Å, V = 1222(3) Å3. Z = 4; T = 20 °C; Dcalc = 1.350 g/cm3; no. of reflections measured total: 7793, unique: 2775; R1 (I > 2.00σ(I)) 0.1744, R (all reflections) 0.3678, wR2 (all reflections) 0.5506; goodness of fit indicator 1.001).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of the SiG, SiNH, and SiNPz-Th.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of SiG (A), SiNH (B), and SiNPz-Th (C).
Figure 4Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm plots of SiG, SiNH, and SiNPz-Th.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric profiles of free silica SiG, SiNH, and SiNTh-Th.
Figure 6Effect of solution pH on the removal of Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) by SiNPz-Th at optimum concentration (110 mg/L in each case) for 60 min at 25 °C.
Figure 7Pseudo-second-order model fit for the adsorption of Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) by SiNPz-Th. Adsorption conditions: V = 10 mL, m = 10 mg of adsorbent, pH = 6, and optimum concentration (110 ppm in each case) at 25 °C.
Kinetics Models Data for Metal Removal onto SiNPz-Th
| Pb(II) | Cu(II) | Zn(II) | Cd(II) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102.20 | 76.42 | 68.95 | 32.68 | |
| Pseudo-First-Order | ||||
| 97.02 ± 2.23 | 73.73 ± 1.23 | 66.16 ± 1.21 | 31.58 ± 0.40 | |
| 0.34 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.8 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| Pseudo-Second-Order | ||||
| 104.16 ± 2.35 | 80.44 ± 0.76 | 72.31 ± 0.89 | 33.67 ± 0.28 | |
| 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.005 ± 4.69 × 10–4 | 0.006 ± 6.55 × 10–4 | 0.02 ± 0.001 | |
| 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | |
Figure 8Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption model fits for Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) by SiNPz-Th. Adsorption conditions: 10 mg, V = 10 mL, 25 °C, and pH = 6 for Pb(II), Zn(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) ions.
Adsorption Isotherm Parameters for the Removal of Heavy Metals onto SiNPz-Th
| Pb(II) | Cu(II) | Zn(II) | Cd(II) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102.20 | 76.42 | 68.95 | 32.68 | |
| Freundlich Isotherm Model | ||||
| 4.51 ± 0.57 | 3.50 ± 0.49 | 4.53 ± 0.94 | 3.39 ± 0.29 | |
| 42.82 ± 3.82 | 25.33 ± 3.56 | 29.98 ± 4.741 | 9.66 ± 0.91 | |
| 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.97 | |
| Langmuir Isotherm Model | ||||
| 0.437 ± 0.04 | 0.17664 ± 0.00943 | 0.22207 ± 0.03091 | 0.12128 ± 0.00654 | |
| 103.84 ± 2.44 | 85.00 ± 1.07 | 77.71 ± 2.28 | 35.91 ± 0.41 | |
| 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | |
Figure 9Effect of temperature on the adsorption of metal ions onto SiNPz-Th.
Adsorption Models Used in This Work and Their Associated Parameters
| metal | Δ | Δ | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb(II) | 08.16 | 133.59 | 299.15 | –31.80 |
| 309.15 | –33.14 | |||
| 319.15 | –34.47 | |||
| Cu(II) | 08.93 | 126.38 | 299.15 | –28.88 |
| 309.15 | –30.13 | |||
| 319.15 | –31.41 | |||
| Zn(II) | 08.31 | 125.99 | 299.15 | –29.50 |
| 309.15 | –30.74 | |||
| 319.15 | –32.02 | |||
| Cd (II) | 03.67 | 103.96 | 299.15 | –27.42 |
| 309.15 | –28.46 | |||
| 319.15 | –29.49 |
Figure 10(a) (left) Schematic view of Lewis structure and significant values of UEP; (right) shape of electron density of the entire SiNPz-Th. (b) (left) NCI isosurface; (right) nucleophilic P—Parr functions of SiNPz-Th.
Figure 11Optimized geometry of complexes formed between reactive atoms of the ligand/water and metal ions (water(2)···M(II)···ligand).
Figure 12Plot of HOMO for our M(II) complexes.
NBO Analysis Calculations for the M(II) Complex (M: Pb, Cu, Zn and Cd)
| EC of M, O34 and N18 | LP(N18) → LP*(M) | LP(O34) → LP*(M) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb(II) complex | Pb:[core]6s1.836p1.20 | 88.33 | 25.54 |
| O34:[core]2s0.212p1.113p0.00 | |||
| N18:[core]2s0.242p1.713p0.00 | |||
| Cu(II) complex | Cu:[core]4s0.173d4.934p0.06 | 53.24 | 13.23 |
| O34:[core]2s0.842p2.583p0.01 | |||
| N18:[core]2s0.682p2.103p0.01 | |||
| Zn(II) complex | Zn:[core]4s1.963d9.994p0.07 | 35.64 | 10.68 |
| O34:[core]2s1.582p5.013p0.01 | |||
| N18:[core]2s1.412p5.093p0.01 | |||
| Cd(II) complex | Cd:[core]5s1.984d10.005p0.03 | 4.32 | |
| O34:[core]2s1.742p5.123p0.01 | |||
| N18:[core]2s1.472p4.313p0.01 | |||
Figure 13Selectivity of SiNPz-Th for Pb(II) removal with initial concentration of 150 mg/L for metal ions.
Effect of Interfering Ions on the Recovery of Pb(II) Ions Adsorbed on the SiNPz-Th Sorbent (Concentration of Pb(II) Ion is 0.05 μg/mL)
| interfering ion | concentration (μg/mL) | recovery of Pb(II) (%) |
|---|---|---|
| K+ | 3000 | 97.69 |
| Na+ | 3000 | 99.15 |
| Ca2+ | 2000 | 96.32 |
| Mg2+ | 2000 | 95.12 |
Adsorption/Regeneration of Hybrid Material Toward Pb(II)
| cycle number | Pb(II)(mg/g) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 102.27 |
| 2 | 102.19 |
| 3 | 101.21 |
| 4 | 100.49 |
| 5 | 100.07 |
Analysis of Pb(II) in Real Water Samples
| water samples | added Pb(II) (mg/L) | removal efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Touissit-Bou-Beker water | 5 | 96.34 |
| 10 | 94.67 | |
| Ghiss water | 5 | 96.65 |
| 10 | 95.98 |
Comparison of the Maximum Adsorption Capacities of Pb(II) by Different Adsorbents Reported in the Literature
| support: silica gel/ligand | references | metal ion (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| this work | ||
| free silica ( | 04.32 | |
| propylamine ( | 06.33 | |
| porphyrin | ( | 55.17 |
| bispyrazole | ( | 35.26 |
| TOES | ( | 75.60 |
| dithiocarbamate | ( | 42.19 |
| 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzaldehyde | ( | 02.27 |
| 3-(2-aminoethylamino)propyl | ( | 19.61 |
| 3-mercaptopropyl | ( | 32.58 |
| PMAEEDA | ( | 61.90 |
| commercial activated carbon (CS-1501) | ( | 25.90 |
| commercial activated carbon (RS-1301) | ( | 35.43 |
| commercial activated carbon (NC-60) | ( | 25.30 |
| commercial activated carbon (aktivkohle) | ( | 23.42 |
| biochar | ( | 37.82 |