| Literature DB >> 32715200 |
Wei Lu1, Dongyan Bao2, Fangxin Ta3, Danping Liu1, Dezhi Zhang1, Zheng Zhang1, Zhongkai Fan1.
Abstract
Skin defects, soft tissue damage, and fractures often occur simultaneously in severe trauma. Under current medical technology, fractures can be quickly fixed by internal or external repair techniques, and early functional exercises can be performed. However, skin defects heal over a long time and can even be difficult to heal. Functional exercise may cause cutting of fresh granulation to break and impair wound healing. Functional exercise and wound healing seem to contradict each other. In this study, an alginate hydrogel was developed. With self-healing characteristics, the hydrogel tightly adhered to the wound and could self-heal breaks in the gel caused by functional exercises. These characteristics enable this hydrogel to be used in complex clinical situations to solve sports rehabilitation and skin defect repair problems. In addition, this hydrogel can slowly release strontium ions, promote angiogenesis and collagen deposition in the wound, and quickly heal the wound.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32715200 PMCID: PMC7377546 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Strontium-Ion-Doped SAA/PEI Hydrogel for Skin Defect Healing
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of sodium alginate aldehyde (SAA) synthesis. (b) The obtained SAA polymer and SA polymer were characterized by FTIR.
Figure 2Preparation and characterization of the strontium-ion-doped SAP hydrogel. (a) Schematic illustration of strontium-ion-doped SAP hydrogel preparation. (b) Effect of strontium ion concentration on injectability of composite hydrogels. (c) Gelation kinetics of AP and SAP hydrogels. (d) The G′ and G″ of the SAP hydrogel when alternate step strain switched from small strain ( γ = 1.0%) to large strain ( γ = 60, 200, and 600%) at a fixed angular frequency (10 rad s–1). Each strain interval was kept as 100 s. (e) Appearance of AP and SAP hydrogels. Scanning electron micrographs of AP and SAP hydrogels.
Figure 3In vitro cell responses to hydrogel: (a) cell migration and tube formation; (b) strontium release curve; (c) HFF-1 viability via CCK8; (d) endothelial cell viability via CCK8; (e) VEGFA expression of the endothelial cell under different interfering conditions; (f) quantification of migrated cells; (g) quantification of tube formation. (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).
Figure 4Wound healing under different conditions: (a) ideograph of wound healing under the hydrogel; (b) wound healing process under different conditions; (c) quantification of the wound healing rate. (d) Histological observation of the wound: H&E staining for the wound healing rate; Masson’s trichrome staining for collagen deposition observation; immunohistochemistry (CD31) revealed wound angiogenesis. (**, p < 0.01).