| Literature DB >> 32715105 |
Poonam Mudgil1, Aparna Ramasubramanian2, Douglas Borchman3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Meibum from donors who have had hematological stem cell transplantations (MHSCT) are susceptible to severe dry eye symptoms and exhibit very high lipid order (stiffness) compared with meibum from donors without dry eye (Mn). Since lipid order could have functional consequences, we compared the rheology and composition of Mn and MHSCT to measure meibum compositional, structural and functional relationships.Entities:
Keywords: Dry eye; Lipids; Meibum; NMR spectroscopy; Rheology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32715105 PMCID: PMC7374597 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Cohort demographics of meibum samples for NMR spectroscopy.
| Cn | CHSCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Average age (y) | 29 ± 16 | 42 ± 19 |
| Age range (y) | 13 to 80 | 10 to 70 |
| Median Age (y) | 23 | 47 |
| Gender (% male) | 59 | 62 |
| Race (%) | C (79) | C (88) |
| Number of Donors | 43 | 16 |
C is Caucasian, B is Black, A is Asian, H is Hispanic. Cn is the cohort of donors who did not have dry eye or had not had a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CHSCT is the cohort of donors who had undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Fig. 1Average 1H NMR spectra of meibum from donors who had hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Numbers refer to the resonance assignments in Table 2. a) The CH3/CH2 resonance region. b) The ester =CH region. c) Numbering of cholesteryl ester carbons.
Assignments for resonances numbered in Fig. 1.
| Shift (ppm) | Resonance Assignment | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.00 to 0.996 | Cholesterol Carbon # 19 ( |
| 2 | 0.906 | Cholesterol Carbon #21 ( |
| 3 | 0.897 | Cholesterol Carbon #21 ( |
| 4 | 0.878 | Straight-chain |
| 5 | 0.868 | Straight-chain |
| 6 | 0.858 | Straight-chain |
| 7 | 0.853 | Iso-branched |
| 8 | 0.850 | Anteiso-branched |
| 9 | 0.843 | Iso-branched |
| 10 | 0.839 | Anteiso-branched |
| 11 | 0.829 | Anteiso-branched |
| 12 | 0.821 | Anteiso-branched |
| 13 | 0.799 | Not assigned |
| 14 | 0.789 | Not assigned |
| 15 | 0.663 | Cholesterol Carbon #18 ( |
| 16 | 5.36 | Cholesterol Carbon #6 ( |
| 17 | 5.33 | Hydrocarbon =CH– |
| 18 | 4.6 | Cholesteryl Ester Carbon #3 ( |
| 19 | 3.9 | Wax Ester –CH2–O–(C |
Meibum composition from 1H NMR resonance intensities.
| Cohort | Cn | CHSCT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anteiso Branching (%) | 20 ± 1 | 18 ± 2 | 0.14 |
| Iso Branching (%) | 21 ± 1 | 16 ± 2 | 0.015* |
| Straight Chain (%) | 59 ± 1 | 66 ± 2 | 0.0008* |
| Cholesteryl Ester/Wax Ester (mole/mole) | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.52 |
| =CH/(Total Esters)‡ | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.084 |
*statistically significant. ‡(16 + 17)/(4+(1 + 15)/3) where the numbers are the intensities of the resonances numbered in Table 2 except for 3 which is a constant. Cn is the cohort of donors who did not have dry eye or had not had a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CHSCT is the cohort of donors who had undergone a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Demographics of pooled samples for rheology determination.
| Sample | Average Age (y) | Age Range (y) | Median Age (y) | Gender (% male) | Race (%) | HSCT | # of Donors | Пmax (mN/m) | (Cs−1)max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1 to 2 | 2 | 75 | C (100) | No | 8 | 21 | 13 |
| PC15 | 15 ± 2 | 13 to 17 | 15 | 88 | C (100) | No | 8 | 15 | 13 |
| PC27 | 27 ± 5 | 20 to 36 | 26 | 50 | C(90) | No | 10 | 24 | 16 |
| PC45 | 45 ± 12 | 40 | 25 | C(50) | No | 4 | 28 | 15 | |
| PT15 | 15 ± 2 | 13 to 18 | 14 | 80 | C(60) | Yes | 5 | 25 | 15 |
| PT43 | 43 ± 15 | 21 to 61 | 49 | 56 | C (100) | Yes | 16 | 32 | 20 |
| PT49 | 49 ± 12 | 24 to 69 | 52 | 54 | C(91) | Yes | 11 | 28 | 22 |
*C is Caucasian, B is Black, A is Asian, H is Hispanic. HSCT is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Пmax is the maximum surface pressure, (Cs−1)max is the elasticity modulus maximum, also called reciprocal compressibility, P is for pooled samples, the number is the average age in years, C is for controls without HSCT, T is donors who had a HSCT.
Fig. 2Biophysical characteristics of meibum from donors without dry-eye and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on artificial tear solution at 35 °C. Top row: pressure-area isotherms; middle row: reciprocal compressibility modulus (Cs−1) as a function of surface pressure; and bottom row: Cs−1 as a function of surface area.
Fig. 3Biophysical characteristics of meibum from donors with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and dry-eye on artificial tear solution at 35 °C. Top row: pressure-area isotherms; middle row: reciprocal compressibility modulus (Cs−1) as a function of surface pressure; and bottom row: Cs−1 as a function of surface area.
Fig. 4Relationship between the maximum elasticity modulus, also called as reciprocal compressibility (Cs−1)max and age for human meibum from donors without dry eye and without having hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from (●) the current study, (■) from reference 27and (▲) from reference 32. (★) meibum from donors that had hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the current study. A higher maximum elasticity modulus indicates a more elastic stiffer lipid layer.