| Literature DB >> 32714907 |
Gabriel Murillo Morales1, Sameh S Ali1,2, Haibing Si1, Weimin Zhang3, Rongxian Zhang4, Keyvan Hosseini5, Jianzhong Sun1, Daochen Zhu1,3.
Abstract
There is increasing interest in research on lignin biodegradation compounds as potential building blocks in applications related to renewable products. More attention is necessary to evaluate the effects of the initial pH conditions during the bacterial degradation of lignin. In this study we performed experiments on lignin biodegradation under acidic and mild alkaline conditions. For acidic biodegradation, lignin was chemically pretreated with hydrogen peroxide. Alkaline biodegradation was achieved by developing the bacterial growth on Luria and Bertani medium with alkali lignin as the sole carbon source. The mutant strain Escherichia coli BL21(Lacc) was used to carry out lignin biodegradation over 10 days of incubation. Results demonstrated that under acidic conditions there was a predominance of aliphatic compounds of the C3-C4 type. Alkaline biodegradation was produced in the context of oxidative stress, with a greater abundance of aryl compounds. The final pH values of acidic and alkaline biodegradation of lignin were 2.53 and 7.90, respectively. The results of the gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis detected compounds such as crotonic acid, lactic acid and 3-hydroxybutanoic acid for acidic conditions, with potential applications for adhesives and polymer precursors. Under alkaline conditions, detected compounds included 2-phenylethanol and dehydroabietic acid, with potential applications for perfumery and anti tumor/anti-inflammatory medications. Size-exclusion chromatography analysis showed that the weight-average molecular weight of the alkaline biodegraded lignin increased by 6.75-fold compared to the acidic method, resulting in a repolymerization of its molecular structure. Lignin repolymerization coincided with an increase in the relative abundance of dehydroabietic acid and isovanillyl alcohol, from 2.70 and 3.96% on day zero to 13.43 and 10.26% on 10th day. The results of the Fourier-transformed Infrared spectroscopy detected the presence of C = O bond and OH functional group associated with carboxylic acids in the acidic method. In the alkaline method there was a greater preponderance of signals related to skeletal aromatic structures, the amine functional group and the C - O - bond. Lignin biodegradation products from E. coli BL21(Laccase), under different initial pH conditions, demonstrated a promising potential to enlarge the spectrum of renewable products for biorefinery activities.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli BL21(Lacc); acid/alkaline incubation; biodegradation compounds; depolymerization/repolymerization; lignin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714907 PMCID: PMC7344149 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1(A) Optical density of acid and alkaline-biodegraded lignin and controls at 280 nm. (B) pH measures of acid and alkaline-biodegraded lignin and (C) pH measures of controls. The range of the pH measures is ±0.50.
FIGURE 2Scanning electron microscopy images of (A) acid-biodegraded lignin, (B) alkaline-biodegraded lignin, (C) control of acid biodegradation, and (D) control of alkaline biodegradation. Scale of reference of 1 μm.
Summary of main degradation compounds from lignin degradation by E. coli BL21(Lacc) and controls.
| Acid biodegradation of lignin | Alkaline biodegradation of lignin | ||||||||
| Retention time | Name of compound | Relative abundance (%) | Potential applications | Image of compound | Retention time | Name of compound | Relative abundance | Potential applications | Image of compound |
| 7.73 | Crotonic acid | 5.22 | Precursor for paints and adhesives | 13.38 | 2-phenylethanol | 3.75 | Ingredient in flavors and fragances | ||
| 10.53 | DL-lactic acid | 11.28 | Polymer precursor, descaler, anti bacterial agent | 16.38 | 1H-Indole | 32.00 | Bacterial signal | ||
| 12.33 | 3-hydroxy butanoic acid | 3.32 | Copolyester | 18.80 | Isovanillyl alcohol | 10.26 | Ingredient in flavors | ||
| 20.23 | Vanillic acid | 4.83 | Flavoring agent | 23.10 | Hexadecanoic acid | 4.33 | Substrate for biofuels | ||
| 20.82 | Protocatechuic acid | 9.67 | Antioxidant/anti inflammatory | 26.17 | Dehydroabietic acid | 13.43 | Anti microbial, anti tumor, anti inflammatory | ||
| 7.73 | Crotonic acid | 6.31 | Precursor for paints and adhesives | 7.73 | Crotonic acid | 5.46 | Precursor for paints and adhesives | ||
| 10.55 | Propylene glycol | 16.48 | Thermoplastics, anti freeze, cosmetics | 8.09 | Ethanamine | 5.91 | Co-substrate in medical applications | ||
| 14.68 | Succinic acid | 7.10 | Metabolic intermediate, platform for polymers | 18.60 | Apocynin | 8.53 | Anti inflammatory agent | ||
| 20.23 | Vanillic acid | 4.34 | Flavoring agent | 20.23 | Vanillic acid | 6.11 | Flavoring agent | ||
| 20.82 | Protocatechuic acid | 7.88 | Antioxidant/anti inflammatory | 26.17 | Dehydroabietic acid | 4.47 | Anti microbial, anti tumor, anti inflammatory | ||
FIGURE 3Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of (A) acid biodegradation of lignin, (B) alkaline biodegradation of lignin, (C) control for acid biodegradation, and (D) control for alkaline biodegradation.
Statistical correlation between optical density and pH for acid and alkaline biodegradation of lignin and controls.
| Sample | Statistical correlation | Correlation test | Significance level |
| Acid biodegradation of lignin | 0.726 | Parametric Pearson | 0.01 |
| Control acid | −0.852 | Parametric Pearson | 0.01 |
| Alkaline biodegradation of lignin | 0.829 | Non-parametric Spearman | 0.01 |
| Control alkaline | −0.227 | Parametric Pearson | No significance |
FIGURE 4Size exclusion chromatography analysis. (A) Universal calibration, (B) curves of acid, alkaline biodegradation of lignin, and controls. From the equation of the universal calibration, “RT” means “retention time.”
Molar mass characterization of lignin samples.
| Sample | Mw | Mn | PDI |
| Alkaline biodegradation of lignin | 32,325 | 7,095 | 4.55 |
| Acid biodegradation of lignin | 4,782 | 2,054 | 2.32 |
| Control acid | 5,996 | 2,741 | 2.19 |
| Control alkaline | 11,254 | 4,362 | 2.58 |
Change in molar mass for alkaline biodegradation of lignin.
| Day | Mn | Mw | PDI |
| 1 | 2,083 | 5,798 | 2.78 |
| 5 | 2,767 | 9,671 | 3.50 |
| 10 | 7,095 | 32,325 | 4.56 |
FIGURE 5(A) Overall FTIR spectra of acid and alkaline biodegradation of lignin and controls; (B) spectra from wave numbers 450–1,300 cm–1; (C) 1,300– 1,800 cm–1; (D) 2,250–3,700 cm–1.
Summary of a general comparison between acid versus alkaline biodegradation of lignin by E. coli BL21(Lacc).
| Acid biodegradation | Alkaline biodegradation | |
| Changes in OD280 | Drop in OD280 values by 41.8% after 2 days | OD280 values rose 18.4% after 6 days |
| Chemical pretreatment | 140°C, N2, 400 kPa, 141.12 mM H2O2 | No chemical pretreatment |
| Initial/final pH values | 7.0/2.53 | 7.0/7.90 |
| Lignin biodegradation compounds | Crotonic acid, DL-lactic acid, 3-hydroxybutanoic acid | 2-Phenylethanol, isovanillyl alcohol, dehydroabietic acid |
| Mw/Mn | 4,782/2,054 | 32,325/7,095 |
| Final PDI | 2.32 | 4.55 |
| Main chemical structure | OH and C = O for carboxylic acids C = O stretch in GS lignins, −C≡N bond Strong signal of S–O bond | OH for alcohols, C = C stretching for aromatic structures, –C≡N bond N–H bonds Stronger signals of C–O–C bonds |