Literature DB >> 32714787

Efficacy of autologous stem cells for bone regeneration during endosseous dental implants insertion - A systematic review of human studies.

Shailesh Varshney1, Anshuman Dwivedi2, Vibha Pandey3.   

Abstract

Availability of adequate quantity and quality of bone is prerequisite for longevity and survival of endosseous dental implants. Most of the clinicians face with the problem of lack of bone due to long-standing edentulism during this treatment modality. Conventional therapies with the use of various types of bone grafts and membranes have provided clinicians with unpredictable and compromised results. Cell-based therapies utilizing undifferentiated cells, that have the potential to differentiate into various cell types including osteoblastic lineages, have demonstrated through various previously conducted in-vitro and animal studies, a successful formation of bone in a predictable manner. Thus the main objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of these therapies when applied on human subjects. A search was carried out in MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for completed randomized and non-randomised clinical trials utilizing stem cell-based therapies with histologic and radiographic analysis written in English up to January 2019. This search of the literature yielded 10 studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all these studies, stem cells were primarily used to achieve bone augmentation during insertion of endosseous dental implants. Results of these therapies conducted on human subjects have shown a positive impact on bone regeneration, in particular, therapies utilizing bone marrow and adipose tissue derived stem cells. But the clinicians need to examine the efficacy, safety, feasibility of these therapies while treating large size defects or planning for shorter healing period and early loading of dental implants.
© 2020 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous stem cells; Biomaterials; Bone grafts; Bone regeneration; Endosseous dental implants; Human studies; Mandibular ridge augmentation; Maxillary sinus floor elevation; Scaffolds

Year:  2020        PMID: 32714787      PMCID: PMC7371911          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  58 in total

1.  Morbidity at the iliac crest donor site following bone grafting of the cleft alveolus.

Authors:  M C Swan; T E E Goodacre
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Mesenchymal stem cells and inorganic bovine bone mineral in sinus augmentation: comparison with augmentation by autologous bone in adult sheep.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Jörg Haberstroh; Jens Kuschnierz; Carola Kister; Dominikus A Lysek; Michele Maglione; S P Xavier; Toshiyuki Oshima; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Sebastian Sauerbier
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma enhance bone formation in sinus grafting: a histomorphometric study in minipigs.

Authors:  Francesco Pieri; Enrico Lucarelli; Giuseppe Corinaldesi; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Roberto Giardino; Massimo Bassi; Davide Donati; Claudio Marchetti
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Platelet-rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts.

Authors:  R E Marx; E R Carlson; R M Eichstaedt; S R Schimmele; J E Strauss; K R Georgeff
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-06

5.  Age changes in the human inferior alveolar artery--a histological study.

Authors:  A D McGregor; D G MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 6.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells regenerate bone in a critical-sized canine segmental defect.

Authors:  Treena Livingston Arinzeh; Susan J Peter; Michael P Archambault; Christian van den Bos; Steve Gordon; Karl Kraus; Alan Smith; Sudha Kadiyala
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The effect of implants loaded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells on the healing of canine segmental bone defects.

Authors:  S P Bruder; K H Kraus; V M Goldberg; S Kadiyala
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Response of human bone marrow-derived MSCs on triphasic Ca-P substrate with various HA/TCP ratio.

Authors:  Indu Bajpai; Duk Yeon Kim; Jung Kyong-Jin; In-Hwan Song; Sukyoung Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.368

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of human chorionic membrane extracts regulating mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenesis.

Authors:  Yoon Young Go; Sung-Won Chae; Jae-Jun Song
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.831

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.