Literature DB >> 32714544

Clinical complete regression after local radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage IV rectal cancer: A case report.

Yazheng Dang1, Hongxiang Gao2, Shigao Huang3,4, Tao Qi1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common type of cancer worldwide with about 0.8 million new cases annually. Improving patient survival remains a challenge for clinicians. Observation waiting method provides improved quality of life compared with direct surgery. This case report suggested that colorectal cancer patients could choose active observation waiting method for treatment. A 59-year-old male patient, with rectal bleeding and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, was admitted to the hospital due to increased fecal blood volume. The electronic colonoscopy revealed multiple polyps in colon and rectum, whereas the pathological biopsy indicated poorly differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma. The clinical stage was defined as T3N2M1a according to the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual (version 8). In addition, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examination showed non-regional lymph node metastasis (subclavian). Subsequently, the expression of PD-L1 (-), NRAS (-), KRAS (-), HRAS (-), BRAF (-) (-, negative) and the microsatellite stability (MSS) were detected in the rectal cancer lesion using molecular pathological examination. Patients with primary rectal cancer and pelvic lymph node metastasis were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT; dose, 60 Gy/30 Fr) and XELOX chemotherapy (200 mg oxaliplatin at day 1 plus 1.5 g capecitabine twice a day from day 1-14 for a total of 5 cycles). PET/CT scan revealed that the metabolism levels of the lesion returned to normal. In addition, the routine re-examination showed progressive improvement of tumor lesions. Until recently, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of the male patient has been within normal range. The observation waiting method rather than the direct sequential surgical resection of the primary lesion in patients with advanced rectal cancer who achieved complete clinical remission (CCR) may provide a novel treatment method for rectal cancer. Thus, overall survival (OS) and quality of survival (QoS) differences between the two strategies need to be further verified by multicenter clinical trials.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical complete response; observation waiting; radiotherapy; rectal cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32714544      PMCID: PMC7366246          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  23 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of the 'wait and see' approach in rectal cancer for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation.

Authors:  R Glynne-Jones; R Hughes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with a Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niamh McCawley; Cillian Clancy; Brian D P O'Neill; Joseph Deasy; Deborah A McNamara; John P Burke
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Audit of definitive colorectal surgery in patients with early and advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  William H Isbister
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 4.  Non-resection versus resection for an asymptomatic primary tumour in patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Stefano Trastulli; Iosief Abraha; Nereo Vettoretto; Carlo Boselli; Alessandro Montedori; Amilcare Parisi; Giuseppe Noya; Cameron Platell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

5.  Is primary tumour resection associated with survival improvement in patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases? A pooled analysis of individual data from four randomised trials.

Authors:  Matthieu Faron; Jean-Pierre Pignon; David Malka; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Jean-Yves Douillard; Antoine Adenis; Dominique Elias; Olivier Bouché; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Y Nancy You; Atin Agarwal; John M Skibber; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Cathy Eng; Barry W Feig; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Christopher H Crane; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Roscoe F Morton; Charles S Fuchs; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Stephen K Williamson; Brian P Findlay; Henry C Pitot; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Outcome of primary tumor in patients with synchronous stage IV colorectal cancer receiving combination chemotherapy without surgery as initial treatment.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Elliot L Servais; Leonard B Saltz; Sujata Patil; Nancy E Kemeny; Jose G Guillem; Martin Weiser; Larissa K F Temple; W Douglas Wong; Phillip B Paty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Survey results of US radiation oncology providers' contextual engagement of watch-and-wait beliefs after a complete clinical response to chemoradiation in patients with local rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jehan Yahya; Daniel Herzig; Matthew Farrell; Catherine Degnin; Yiyi Chen; John Holland; Simon Brown; Christina Binder; Jerry Jaboin; Vassiliki Liana Tsikitis; Nima Nabavizadeh; Charles R Thomas; Timur Mitin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-12

10.  Clinicopathological features and prognosis of AFP-producing colorectal cancer: a single-center analysis of 20 cases.

Authors:  Fei Ren; Weiwei Weng; Qiongyan Zhang; Cong Tan; Midie Xu; Meng Zhang; Lei Wang; Weiqi Sheng; Shujuan Ni; Dan Huang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.