| Literature DB >> 32714413 |
Jing-Xian Xue1, Bei Ye1, Shun Liu1, Si-Han Cao1, Wei-He Bian1, Chang Yao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether Chuang Ling Ye (CLY), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine compound, could improve the treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) via decreasing inflammatory response.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714413 PMCID: PMC7341429 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6964801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
CLY composition.
| Name (botanical, common Pinyin names), traditional daily dose (grams) | Active compounds | Clinical and pharmacological effects | Adverse effects/toxicity |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| The known chemical component of |
| No reported adverse events |
|
| The rhubarb root contains aloe-emodin, rhein, emodin, chrysophanol et al. [ | It has been used for a variety of conditions, such as constipation, chronic renal failure, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It has antimicrobial and antioxidative effects [ | The toxicity includes hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. No adverse reactions were observed in mice with a dose of 400 mg/kg [ |
|
| The flowers of safflower contain kaempferol and hydroxysafflor yellow [ | It reduces immune inflammatory response [ | 3 patients had a diagnosis of acute liver failure, while consumed safflower as a dietary supplement for weight loss [ |
|
| Contains chebulin and hyperoside [ | It is used in asthma, ulcers, gout, heart, and bladder diseases [ | No reported adverse events |
Figure 1Analysis of the main components of CLY. (a) Caffeic acid, (b) emodin, (c) rhein, (d) physcion, (e) aloe-emodin, (f) hydroxysafflor yellow A, (g) kaempferide, and (h) hyperoside.
Figure 2Chromatogram. (a) emodin, (b) rhein, (c) physcion, (d) hyperoside, (e) caffeic acid, (f) aloe-emodin, (g) hydroxysafflor yellow A, and (h) kaempferide.
Figure 3CONSORT followchart of the clinical study.
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
| Control group | CLY group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 34.65 ± 7.49 | 34.35 ± 4.42 | 0.878 |
| Height (cm) | 158.6 ± 4.58 | 159 ± 3.6 | 0.760 |
| Weight (kg) | 57.7 ± 6.81 | 57.3 ± 6.59 | 0.851 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.5 ± 2.69 | 21.78 ± 2.36 | 0.374 |
| Lactation (month) | 9.55 ± 5.08 | 8.95 ± 4.55 | 0.696 |
Comparing the size of the neoplasm (in cm2) between the two groups.
| Control group | CLY group | Estimated group difference (95% confidence interval) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | 41.09 ± 4.00 | 41.33 ± 4.66 | 0.865 | |
| Day 15 | 29.14 ± 7.71 | 27.46 ± 9.25 | −1.92 (−7.61, 3.77) | 0.489 |
| Day 29 | 21.14 ± 10.12 | 14.28 ± 8.96 | −7.1 (−13.75, −0.45) | 0.038 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 |
aComparing the two groups. bComparing at day 29 with that at day 1.
Comparison of the pain score between the two groups.
| Control group | CLY group | Estimated group difference (95% confidence interval) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | 5.45 ± 1.00 | 5.90 ± 0.72 | 0.849 | |
| Day 15 | 3.85 ± 1.18 | 3.50 ± 1.05 | −0.5 (−1.25, 0.25) | 0.180 |
| Day 29 | 2.20 ± 1.20 | 1.15 ± 0.88 | −1.10 (−1.79, −0.41) | 0.004 |
Comparing the levels of inflammatory factors between the two groups.
| Inflammatory factor (pg/ml) | Control group | CLY group | Estimated group difference (95% confidence interval) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF- | Day 1 | 248.34 ± 53.56 | 243.8 ± 78.15 | 0.831 | |
| Day 15 | 264.19 ± 95.67 | 159.48 ± 72.25 | −85.47 (−149.65, −21.28) | 0.012 | |
| Day 29 | 200.20 ± 76.81 | 110.95 ± 56.91 | −81.59 (−156.45, −6.73) | 0.035 | |
|
| |||||
| IFN- | Day 1 | 36.95 ± 15.42 | 50.41 ± 37.06 | 0.145 | |
| Day 15 | 36.81 ± 15.64 | 32.00 ± 27.46 | −18.27 (−41.20, 4.65) | 0.112 | |
| Day 29 | 38.8 ± 23.53 | 16.35 ± 11.1 | −45.78 (−68.58, −22.97) | 0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| IL-1 | Day 1 | 767.11 ± 235.88 | 763.43 ± 176.21 | 0.956 | |
| Day 15 | 705.1 ± 205.51 | 370.56 ± 177.94 | −0.50 (−1.25, 0.25) | 0.180 | |
| Day 29 | 723.8 ± 198.57 | 248.47 ± 119.62 | −1.10 (−1.79, -0.41) | 0.004 | |
|
| |||||
| IL-2 | Day 1 | 224.91 ± 97.41 | 234.56 ± 93.62 | 0.751 | |
| Day 15 | 167.79 ± 124.42 | 111.96 ± 87.89 | −65.48 (−159.64, 28.69) | 0.162 | |
| Day 29 | 114.05 ± 64.86 | 48.47 ± 27.53 | −89.27 (−181.55, 3.02) | 0.057 | |
|
| |||||
| IL-6 | Day 1 | 144.42 ± 47.67 | 132.38 ± 60.68 | 0.489 | |
| Day 15 | 88.06 ± 39.60 | 66.34 ± 38.2 | −9.67 (−50.02, 30.67) | 0.622 | |
| Day 29 | 50.64 ± 20.12 | 36.91 ± 16.54 | −0.65 (−49.53, 48.23) | 0.978 | |