| Literature DB >> 32714128 |
Yuexin Cai1,2, Mingwei Xie3, Yun Su3, Zhaopeng Tong1,2, Xiaoyan Wu3, Wenchao Xu1,2, Jiahong Li1,2, Fei Zhao4,5, Caiping Dang6,7, Guisheng Chen1,2, Liping Lan1,2, Jun Shen3, Yiqing Zheng1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The neural bases in acute tinnitus remains largely undetected. The objective of this study was to identify the alteration of the brain network involved in patients with acute tinnitus and hearing loss.Entities:
Keywords: acute tinnitus; causal connectivity; functional connectivity; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); hearing loss
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714128 PMCID: PMC7340148 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Seed regions of interest, center coordinates in MNI space.
| M-TG | L | −57 | −18 | −15 |
| R | 58 | −17 | −15 | |
| STG | L | −62 | −23 | 12 |
| R | 63 | −24 | 12 | |
| L | −46 | −29 | 10 | |
| R | 47 | −29 | 10 | |
| L | −56 | −25 | 5 | |
| R | 56 | −22 | 3 | |
| NAc | L | −10 | 12 | −13 |
| R | 13 | 11 | −13 | |
| AMYG | L | −24 | −6 | −18 |
| R | 24 | −6 | −18 | |
| PHG | L | −26 | −36 | −10 |
| R | 26 | −36 | −10 | |
| Pregenual ACC | L | −4 | 38 | 4 |
| R | 4 | 38 | 4 | |
| Subgenual ACC | L | −4 | 26 | −10 |
| R | 4 | 26 | −10 | |
| Ventromedial PFC | L | −3 | 44 | −8 |
| R | 3 | 44 | −8 | |
Demographic and clinical characteristics of sudden deafness with tinnitus patients and healthy controls.
| Age (year) | 43.57 ± 15.42 | 44.48 ± 17.05 | 0.868a |
| Gender (male; female) | 10:14 | 12:9 | 0.300b |
| Education levels (years) | 12.54 ± 3.50 | 12.61 ± 4.13 | 0.293a |
| Tinnitus laterality (right/left/bilateral) | 8/10/6 | N/A | N/A |
| PTA of right ear | 36.96 ± 28.98 | 15.57 ± 4.52 | 0.002a |
| PTA of left ear | 38.08 ± 25.99 | 14.52 ± 4.43 | < 0.001a |
| Average PTA | 36.27 ± 13.84 | 15.05 ± 4.20 | < 0.001a |
| Duration (days) | 9.95 ± 7.08 | N/A | N/A |
| THI | 36.25 ± 21.75 | N/A | N/A |
Regions showing significant differences of auditory-FC between ISSNHL patients and healthy controls.
| STG.L (-62, −23, 12) | CER4_5.R | 18, −42, −26 | −4.83 | 82 |
| STG.R (63, −24, 12) | CERCRU2.R | 3, −78, −39 | −4.29 | 45 |
| CER6.R | −15, −57, −25 | −4.89 | 45 | |
| STG.L (-56, −25, 5) | PreCG.L | −18, −18, 69 | −5.59 | 233 |
| STG.R (56, −22, 3) | CER8.L | −30, −51, −57 | −5.15 | 52 |
| CER6.L | −12, −66, −24 | −4.64 | 41 | |
| MOG.L | −39, −89, −7 | −4.18 | 267 | |
| ITG.L | −36, 15, −41 | −4.27 | 309 | |
| PCL.L | −9, −27, 72 | −4.74 | 457 | |
| CERCRU2.R | 6, −84, −42 | −4.36 | 89 | |
| AMYG.R | 24, −3, −15 | −4.97 | 160 | |
| PoCG.R | 60, −21, 45 | −5.68 | 188 |
FIGURE 1The brain regions with significant difference in the auditory-FC between ISSNHL patients and healthy controls. Left brain diagram shows the seed region of interesting of auditory system, right brain diagram presents the regions with significant group-difference. FC, functional connectivity; STG, superior temporal gyrus; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; PCL, paracentral lobule; AMYG, amygdala; CERCRU2, cerebellum_Crus2; CER4_5, cerebellum_4_5; CER6, cerebellum_6; CER8, cerebellum_8; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere. The color bar represents the t-value.
Regions showing significant differences of limbic-FC between ISSNHL patients and healthy controls.
| NAc.L | PoCG.R | 39, −30, 45 | −4.78 | 53 |
| SFG.R | 15, −9, 63 | −4.70 | 28 | |
| AMYG.L | STG.R | 57, −21, 0 | −4.57 | 33 |
| PHG.L | SMA.R | 6, 0, 48 | −4.95 | 57 |
FIGURE 2The brain regions show significant difference of the limbic-FC between ISSNHL patients and healthy controls. Left brain diagram shows the seed region of interesting of limbic system, right brain graph presents the regions with significant group-difference. FC, functional connectivity; STG, superior temporal gyrus; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; NAc, nucleus accumbens; SFG, Superior frontal gyrus; AMYG, amygdala; PHG, paraHippocampal gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere. The color bar represents the t-value.
FIGURE 3Increased GCA value from AMYG.R to STG.R (in red) and decreased GCA value from PoCG.R to NAc.L (in blue) were found in the ISSNHL patients. The correlations between abnormal GCA value and THI in the ISSNHL patients. The red dots represent each ISSNHL patient. FC, functional connectivity; GCA, granger causality analysis; THI, tinnitus handicap inventory; STG, superior temporal gyrus; AMYG, amygdala; NAc, nucleus accumbens; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere.
FIGURE 4The correlations between the FC with significant group-difference and PTA in the ISSNHL patients. The red dots represent each ISSNHL patient. FC, functional connectivity; PTA, pure tone audiometry; STG, superior temporal gyrus; AMYG, amygdala; NAc, nucleus accumbens; PoCG, postcentral gyrus; left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere.