| Literature DB >> 32714050 |
Emdadul Haque1, Hiroaki Tabuchi1, Yuki Monden2, Keisuke Suematsu1, Kenta Shirasawa3, Sachiko Isobe3, Masaru Tanaka1.
Abstract
While sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) improvement has generally been done by field-based selection, molecular genetic studies on traits of interest, i.e., molecular markers are needed for enhancing the breeding program of this world's 7th most important crop, as such markers facilitate marker-assisted selection. Here, we performed a combined approach of QTLs analyses and GWAS of storage root β-carotene content (BC), dry-matter (DM) and starch content (SC) using the genetic linkage maps constructed with 5,952 and 5,640 SNPs obtained from F1 progenies between cultivars 'J-Red' and 'Choshu'. BC was negatively correlated with DM (r = -0.45) and SC (r = -0.51), while DM was positively correlated with SC (r = 0.94). In both parental maps, a total of five, two and five QTL regions on linkage groups 7 and 8 were associated with BC, DM and SC, respectively. In GWAS of BC, one strong signal (P = 1.04 × 10-9) was observed on linkage group 8, which co-located with one of the above QTL regions. The SNPs markers found here, particularly for β-carotene, would be useful base resources for future marker-assisted selection program with this trait.Entities:
Keywords: GWAS; QTL; ddRAD SNPs; root dry-matter; starch; sweetpotato; β-carotene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714050 PMCID: PMC7372034 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.19099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
QTLs controlling BC, DM and SC in JCF1 progeny
| Traits | Locus | Kruskall-Wallis | Interval-mapping | Genotype score | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG | Marker name | Position | K* | Sig. | LOD | PVE | Homo | Hetero | MD | D | |||||
| BC_J | Ib07_4 | Itr_sc001596_10966 | 67.75 | 6.32 | ** | 4.69 | 68.0 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.40 | + | 1.06 × 10–3 | |||
| Ib08_4 | Itr_sc000066_68839 | 164.21 | 24.22 | ******* | 7.74 | 49.6 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.70 | + | 1.04 × 10–9 | ||||
| Ib08_6 | Itr_sc000227_94993 | 65.68 | 8.03 | **** | 3.24 | 29.3 | 0.79 | 0.20 | 0.59 | – | 3.09 × 10–4 | ||||
| BC_C | Ib08_3 | Itr_sc000227_94989 | 565.29 | 8.03 | **** | 3.83 | 28.7 | 0.79 | 0.20 | 0.59 | – | 3.09 × 10–4 | |||
| Itr_sc000066_1754 | 620.05 | 4.02 | ** | 3.21 | 24.8 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.49 | – | 6.04 × 10–5 | |||||
| DM_J | Ib07_4 | Itr_sc000546_59175 | 77.20 | 11.46 | ***** | 3.04 | 25.2 | 26.93 | 24.00 | 2.93 | – | 3.45 × 10–4 | |||
| Ib08_4 | Itr_sc000057_157946 | 57.15 | 10.64 | **** | 3.31 | 50.9 | 27.46 | 24.82 | 2.64 | – | 0.0045 | ||||
| SC_J | Ib07_4 | Itr_sc000546_59175 | 77.20 | 11.72 | ***** | 2.93 | 25.5 | 16.25 | 13.77 | 2.48 | – | 4.74 × 10–4 | |||
| Ib08_4 | Itr_sc000057_157946 | 57.15 | 14.95 | ****** | 3.31 | 50.9 | 16.97 | 14.34 | 2.63 | – | 7.67 × 10–4 | ||||
| SC_C | Ib07_2 | Itr_sc000393_73439 | 90.03 | 8.71 | **** | 3.07 | 23.8 | 14.65 | 16.66 | 2.01 | + | 0.0074 | |||
| Itr_sc004815_16417 | 118.76 | 8.46 | **** | 3.20 | 24.7 | 14.33 | 16.37 | 2.04 | + | 0.0061 | |||||
| Ib07_4 | Itr_sc000216_53020 | 0.00 | 7.80 | *** | 3.30 | 25.3 | 16.29 | 14.19 | 2.10 | – | 0.0015 | ||||
LG indicates linkage group.
shows position of marker in cM from top.
K* shows Kruskall-Wallis test results.
**, ***, ****, *****, ****** and ******* indicate significant differences between genotypes by KW analysis at P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.005, 0.001, 0.0005 and 0.0001 levels, respectively.
PVE indicates the percentage in phenotype of variance explained in each QTL.
Arithmetic mean of BC, RDM and SC content of progenies according to the homozygous (Homo) and heterozygous (Hetero) genotypes of the SNPs markers, respectively, and the mean differences (MD) between the genotypes (homo, hetero).
Direction (D) indicates SNP genotypes with increasing or decreasing effect on BC, DM and SC levels. “+” means SNP genotypes (hetero) resembles that of J or C with increasing effect on traits. “−” means SNP genotypes (hetero) resembles that of J or C with decreasing effect on traits.
indicates SNPs with significant P-values after Bonferroni correction.
Fig. 1.Histogram of β-carotene (BC), root dry-matter (DM) and starch content (SC) in the J-Red (J) × Choshu (C) progenies (JCF1). (A) Histogram of BC (absorbance at 455 nm; A455) in 52 JCF1 and their parents. (B) Histogram of DM (%). (C) Histogram of SC (%). Arrows indicate positions of parental cultivars.
Correlation among traits in the 52 JCF1 progenies of the J × C
| Trait | BC | DM | SC |
|---|---|---|---|
| BC | 1 | ||
| DM | –0.45 | 1 | |
| SC | –0.51 | 0.94 | 1 |
All the root traits were from physiological maturity under greenhouse condition.
Fig. 2.QTLs on linkage maps and associated SNPs for the J parental map. (A) Significant QTLs for BC, DM and SC, which were listed in Supplemental Table 2, are shown in boxes. The selected SNP markers were listed in Table 2, are shown in triangle. QTLs with positive effect are indicated by “+” sign, and those with negative effects were indicated by “–” sign. Position of each QTLs were shown in parenthesis. (B) Manhattan plots from GWAS. Redline is significance threshold of 5% Bonferroni correction. QTLs related to BC, DM and SC are indicated. –log10(P) for each QTLs are shown in parenthesis.
Fig. 3.QTLs on linkage maps and associated SNPs for the C parental map. (A) Significant QTLs for BC, DM and SC, which were listed in Supplemental Table 2, are shown in boxes. The selected SNP markers were listed in Table 2, are shown in triangle. QTLs with positive effect are indicated by “+” sign, and those with negative effects were indicated by “–” sign. Position of each QTLs were shown in parenthesis. (B) Manhattan plots from GWAS. Redline is significance threshold of 5% Bonferroni correction. QTLs related to BC, DM and SC are indicated. –log10(P) for each QTLs are shown in parenthesis.