| Literature DB >> 32714043 |
Rais Ahmad Khan1, Mohammad Rashid Khan2, Mohammad Usman3, Fatima Sayeed4, Huda A Alghamdi5, Sulaiman Alrumman5, Walaa Alharbi6, Nida N Farshori7, Mai M Al-Oqail7, Mohd Rafiq Siddiqui1, Maymonah Abu Khanjer1, Ali Alsalme1.
Abstract
The development of preferentially selective cancer chemotherapeutics is a new trend in drug research. Thus, we designed and synthesized novel ternary complexes, [Cu(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3 (1) and [Zn(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3 (2) (tryp = DL-Tryptophane; Hnor = Norharmane, β-carboline; DMSO = Dimethyl sulfoxide), characterized with elemental analysis, FTIR, UV-vis, FL, NMR, ESI-MS, and molar conductivity. Furthermore, the TD-DFT studies with UV-vis and FTIR validated the proposed structures of 1 and 2. Moreover, we evaluated the HOMO-LUMO energy gap and found that 1 has a smaller energy gap than 2. Then, 1 and 2 were assessed for anticancer chemotherapeutic potential against cancer cell lines MCF7 (human breast cancer) and HepG2 (human liver hepatocellular carcinoma) as well as the non-tumorigenic HEK293 (human embryonic kidney) cells. The MTT assay illustrated the preferentially cytotoxic behavior of 1 when compared with that of 2 and cisplatin (standard drug) against MCF7 cells. Moreover, 1 was exposed to MCF7 cells, and the results indicated the arrest of the G2/M phases, which followed the apoptotic pathway predominantly. Generation of ROS, GSH depletion, and elevation in LPO validated the redox changes prompted by 1. These studies establish the great potential of 1 as a candidate for anticancer therapeutics.Entities:
Keywords: Anticancer; Apotosis; Cell cycle; Computational chemistry; Copper complex; MCF7
Year: 2020 PMID: 32714043 PMCID: PMC7376190 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the synthesis of the two ternary complexes: [Cu(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3(1) and [Zn(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3(2).
Fig. 2DFT-optimized structures of (A) 1 and (B) 2. Only coordinated donor atoms are labeled. H atoms are omitted for clarity.
Fig. 3Frontier molecular orbitals of 1 (left) and 2 (right) and their HOMO-LUMO energy gaps.
The cell viability assay (MTT assay) lists IC50 values (in µM) for the treatment of two human cancer cell lines and a non-tumorigenic cell line.
| Complex | HepG2(µM) | MCF7(µM) | HEK293 (µM) | [Ref] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Cu(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3 | 27 ± 1.1 | 10 ± 1.3 | >100 | |
| [Zn(tryp)(Hnor)2(DMSO)]NO3 | 88 ± 1.9 | 24 ± 1.7 | >150 | |
| [Cu(tryp)1,2-diaminobenzene] Cl | ND | less than10 | ND | ( |
| [Zn(tryp)1,2-diaminobenzene] Cl | ND | 35 | ND | ( |
| Cu(NO3)2 | >200 | >200 | >200 | |
| Zn(NO3)2 | >200 | >200 | >200 | |
| Free Hnor | >200 | >200 | >200 | |
| Free tryp | >200 | >200 | >200 | |
| Cisplatin | 7.63 ± 1.6 | 38 ± 1.23 | >50 | ( |
Fig. 4Morphological changes of MCF7 cells induced by 1 and 2 at a concentration of 10 µM.
Fig. 5Cell cycle analysis determined (A) cell populations in each phase and (B) a histogram showing the treated cells with different concentrations of 1 in each phase within MCF7 cancer cells.
Fig. 6Flow cytometry analysis of apoptotic induction by 1 in the MCF7 cell line at a concentration of 7, 10, and 15 µM using an Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit.
Fig. 7ROS generation in MCF7 cells exposed to 1 at a concentration of 10 µM.
Fig. 8(i) The concentration-dependent activity of 1 exhibited by the percent change in LPO and GSH in the MCF7 cell line. (ii) The possible mechanism associated with (a) anti-oxidant action of GSH and (b) dismutation of superoxide induced by the Cu(II)-RSSR complex (GR, glutathione reductase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; NRP, non-radical product; X+, pro-oxidant electrophile).