| Literature DB >> 32713346 |
Antonin Bouroumeau1, Eleonore Kaphan2, Clémentine Legrand3, Tatiana Raskovalova3, Gautier Szymanski3, Claire Vettier3, Christine Lefebvre3, Marie-Christine Jacob3, Anne McLeer1, Michel Peuchmaur4, Rémy Gressin2, Hervé Sartelet5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 is an aggressive mature B-cell neoplasm, whereas B-lymphoblastic lymphoma is immature cell proliferation, with a frequent positivity for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. The transformation of a low-grade follicular lymphoma into a lymphoblastic neoplasm expressing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase is a very rare event. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Follicular lymphoma; High-grade B-cell lymphoma; Lymphoblastic neoplasm; TdT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32713346 PMCID: PMC7384216 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-020-02433-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Case Rep ISSN: 1752-1947
Fig. 1Morphological and immunohistochemical analyses of the follicular lymphoma. a Infiltration of the lymph node by a nodular proliferation. × 10 lens objective. b Nodules composed of centrocytes. × 40 lens objective. c Bcl-2 expression by the tumor cells. × 10 lens objective. d CD21 immunostaining highlighting the follicular dendritic cell meshwork. × 10 lens objective
Fig. 2Karyotypes. a Karyotype performed on the first lymph node biopsy. Black arrows indicate the t(14;18) translocation and other cytogenetic abnormalities. Cytogenetic designation (ISCN 2016): 48,XY,+X,del(1)(q22),+i(1)(q10),t(14;18)(q32;q21), [11]/50,sl,+ 12,+ 21 [6]/46,XY [3].ish der(1)t(1;8)(q21;q24)(MYC+),8q24(MYCx2). b Karyotype performed on ascites fluid (third progression). Black arrows indicate the t(8;22) and t(14;18) translocations and other abnormalities. Cytogenetic designation (ISCN 2016): 48,XY,+X,del(1)(q21),+i(1)(q10),t(8;22)(q24;q11),t(14;18)(q32;q21) [9].ishder(1)t(1;8)(q21;q24)(5’MYC+,3’MYC+),t(8;22)(5’MYC+;3’MYC+)
Cytogenetic analyses
| Time of disease | Type of sample | Karyotype designation ( | FISH Bcl2 (% of interphase cells) | FISH Myc (% of interphase cells) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Lymph node | 48,XY,+X,der(1)t(1;8)(q21;q14)),+i(1)(q10),t(14;18)(q32;q21), [11]/50,sl,+ 12,+ 21[6]/46,XY [3].ish der(1)t(1;8)(MYC+),8q24(MYCx2) | Rearrangement (85%) | Gain (84%) |
| Third progression | Ascites | 48,XY,+X,der(1)t(1;8)(q21;q24),+i(1)(q10), | Rearrangement (90%) | Gain (90%) and rearrangement by t(8;22) (90%) |
FISH Fluorescence in situ hybridization
t(8;22)(q24;q11) is associated with genomic instability and a poor prognosis
Fig. 3Flow cytometric analyses. a First lymph node (follicular lymphoma). b Ascites fluid (third progression) (lymphoblastic lymphoma). Flow cytometry of ascites fluid revealing a population of monotypic B-cells, expressing CD43, CD38, CD24, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, but with downregulation of pan-B markers (loss of CD20) and loss of the surface kappa light chains
Fig. 4Morphological and immunohistochemical analyses of the retroperitoneal mass. a Lymphoblastic morphology (arrows) associated with centroblastic morphology (arrowheads), Hematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E)-stained sections, × 20 lens objective. b Presence of lymphoblastic cells in ascites fluid as revealed by May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining, × 100 lens objective. Presence of two populations: (c) one composed of centroblasts expressing Bcl-6 (× 20 lens objective) and (d) the other composed of lymphoblasts expressing terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) (× 20 lens objective). e Double-staining evaluation of lymphoblasts and centroblasts (TdT in brown and BCL-6 in red), × 40 lens objective
Molecular analyses
| Time of disease | Type of sample | BCR clonality (IGH) | IGVH identification | Open Reading Frame | Percentage of VH homology with germline sequence | Percentage of VH homology relative to diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Lymph node | FR1+,a FR2-, FR3- | IGHV4–59*01, IGHD5–24*01, IGHJ4*02 | Yes | 87.27% | |
| Second progression | Lymph node | FR1+,a FR2-, FR3- | IGHV4–59*01, IGHD5–24*01, IGHJ4*02 | Yes | 84.55%b | 96.9% |
| Third progression | Ascites | FR1+,a FR2-, FR3- | IGHV4–59*01, IGHD5–24*01, IGHJ4*02 | Yes | 86.36% | 98.9% |
a FR1 band of the same size for the three samples
b Detection of two ongoing mutations
BCR B Cell Receptor, IGVH Immunoglobulin Variable region Heavy chain, IGH Immunoglobin Heavy chain, VH immunoglobulin heavy chain variable domain