Lucas M Ritschl1, Andreas M Fichter1, Achim von Bomhard1, Steffen Koerdt2,3,4, Victoria Kehl5, Andreas Kolk1, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff1, Florian D Grill1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. 2. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. 5. Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perforator imaging is routinely performed before perforator flap harvest. Hand-held Doppler (hhD) and color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) are currently the most popular radiation-free methods for this purpose that can be applied by the surgeon alone. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility of hhD and CDU with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in the anterolateral thigh perforator flap (ALTPF). METHODS:All consecutive ALTPF procedures between May 2017 and April 2018 were included in this prospective study. The perforators were visualized by three investigators independently and randomized, applying hhD, CDU, and ICGA. The presence and the distance to the identified perforator were registered. Further, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists-status, and the patient's history regarding smoking, alcohol use, and diabetes mellitus were registered alongside gender and age to analyze possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were enrolled with a median age of 67 (52-87) years. In total, 30 perforators were detected intraoperatively as well as with the ICGA. The latter visualized the perforators significantly more precisely than hhD and CDU (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). The sensitivity and positive predictive value were 67 and 62% for hhD, 73 and 64% for CDU, and 100 and 100% for ICGA, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to this study, ICGA visualized perforators more accurately than the standard methods hhD and CDU. Further, it was associated with the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value. ICGA consistently delivered excellent results, whereas hhD and CDU showed variability. Thieme. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Perforator imaging is routinely performed before perforator flap harvest. Hand-held Doppler (hhD) and color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) are currently the most popular radiation-free methods for this purpose that can be applied by the surgeon alone. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility of hhD and CDU with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in the anterolateral thigh perforator flap (ALTPF). METHODS: All consecutive ALTPF procedures between May 2017 and April 2018 were included in this prospective study. The perforators were visualized by three investigators independently and randomized, applying hhD, CDU, and ICGA. The presence and the distance to the identified perforator were registered. Further, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists-status, and the patient's history regarding smoking, alcohol use, and diabetes mellitus were registered alongside gender and age to analyze possible confounders. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients were enrolled with a median age of 67 (52-87) years. In total, 30 perforators were detected intraoperatively as well as with the ICGA. The latter visualized the perforators significantly more precisely than hhD and CDU (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). The sensitivity and positive predictive value were 67 and 62% for hhD, 73 and 64% for CDU, and 100 and 100% for ICGA, respectively. CONCLUSION: According to this study, ICGA visualized perforators more accurately than the standard methods hhD and CDU. Further, it was associated with the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value. ICGA consistently delivered excellent results, whereas hhD and CDU showed variability. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Andreas M Fichter; Thomas Mücke; Lucas M Ritschl; Marie-Kristin Hofmann; Constantin T Wolff; Leonard H Schmidt; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 4.379