Literature DB >> 32712635

Current Status of Laparoscopic and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery and Its Adoption in Singapore.

Brian Kp Goh1, Roxanne Y Teo.   

Abstract

Despite the potential clinical advantages offered by laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS), the main obstacle to its widespread adoption is the technically demanding nature of the procedure and its steep learning curve. LPS and robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) have been proven to result in superior short-term perioperative outcomes and equivalent long-term oncological outcomes compared to the conventional open approach, with the caveat that they are performed by expert surgeons who have been trained to perform such procedures. The primary challenge faced by most pancreatic surgeons is the steep learning curve associated with these complex procedures and the need to undergo surgical training, especially with regards to laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current evidence suggests that RPS may help to shorten the lengthy learning curve required for LPS. More robust evidence-in the form of large randomised controlled trials-is needed to determine whether LPS and RPS can be safely adopted universally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32712635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  4 in total

1.  A single institution experience with robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Shi Qing Lee; Tousif Kabir; Ye-Xin Koh; Jin-Yao Teo; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Peng-Chung Cheow; Prema Raj Jeyaraj; Pierce K H Chow; London L Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jinyi Wu; Tousif Kabir; Joseph J Zhao; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomies with vascular resection: A 1:1 propensity-matched comparison study.

Authors:  Edwin Yang; Yvette Chong; Zhongkai Wang; Ye-Xin Koh; Kai-Inn Lim; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.018

4.  Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open spleen-saving distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Madeline Chee; Chuan-Yaw Lee; Ser-Yee Lee; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.