Pierre Laumonerie1, Yoann Dalmas2, Meagan E Tibbo3, Suzanne Robert2, Marie Faruch4, Patrick Chaynes5, Nicolas Bonnevialle2, Pierre Mansat2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France; Anatomy Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: laumonerie.pierre@hotmail.fr. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pierre-Paul-Riquet, Toulouse, France. 5. Anatomy Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Toulouse, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Painful shoulders create a substantial socioeconomic burden and significant diagnostic challenge for shoulder surgeons. Consensus with respect to the anatomic location of sensory nerve branches is lacking. The aim of this literature review was to establish consensus with respect to the anatomic features of the articular branches (ABs) (1) innervating the shoulder joint and (2) the distribution of sensory receptors about its capsule and bursae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four electronic databases were queried, between January 1945 and June 2019. Thirty original articles providing a detailed description of the distribution of sensory receptors about the shoulder joint capsule (13) and its ABs (22) were reviewed. RESULTS: The suprascapular, lateral pectoral, axillary, and lower subscapular nerves were found to provide ABs to the shoulder joint. The highest density of nociceptors was found in the subacromial bursa. The highest density of mechanoreceptors was identified within the insertion of the glenohumeral ligaments. The most frequently identified innervation pattern comprised 3 nerve bridges (consisting of ABs from suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves) connecting the trigger and the identified pain generator areas rich in nociceptors. CONCLUSION: Current literature supports the presence of a common sensory innervation pattern for the human shoulder joint. Anatomic studies have demonstrated that the most common parent nerves supplying ABs to the shoulder joint are the suprascapular, lateral pectoral, and axillary nerves. Further studies are needed to assess both the safety and efficacy of selective denervation of the painful shoulders, while limiting the loss of proprioceptive function.
BACKGROUND: Painful shoulders create a substantial socioeconomic burden and significant diagnostic challenge for shoulder surgeons. Consensus with respect to the anatomic location of sensory nerve branches is lacking. The aim of this literature review was to establish consensus with respect to the anatomic features of the articular branches (ABs) (1) innervating the shoulder joint and (2) the distribution of sensory receptors about its capsule and bursae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four electronic databases were queried, between January 1945 and June 2019. Thirty original articles providing a detailed description of the distribution of sensory receptors about the shoulder joint capsule (13) and its ABs (22) were reviewed. RESULTS: The suprascapular, lateral pectoral, axillary, and lower subscapular nerves were found to provide ABs to the shoulder joint. The highest density of nociceptors was found in the subacromial bursa. The highest density of mechanoreceptors was identified within the insertion of the glenohumeral ligaments. The most frequently identified innervation pattern comprised 3 nerve bridges (consisting of ABs from suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves) connecting the trigger and the identified pain generator areas rich in nociceptors. CONCLUSION: Current literature supports the presence of a common sensory innervation pattern for the human shoulder joint. Anatomic studies have demonstrated that the most common parent nerves supplying ABs to the shoulder joint are the suprascapular, lateral pectoral, and axillary nerves. Further studies are needed to assess both the safety and efficacy of selective denervation of the painful shoulders, while limiting the loss of proprioceptive function.
Authors: Marta Montané-Blanchart; Maribel Miguel-Pérez; Lourdes Rodero-de-Lamo; Ingrid Möller; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Carlo Martinoli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.614