Literature DB >> 32712175

Citation impact was highly variable for reporting guidelines of health research: a citation analysis.

Lisa Caulley1, Wei Cheng2, Ferrán Catalá-López3, Jonathan Whelan4, Michel Khoury4, Jennifer Ferraro4, Don Husereau5, Douglas G Altman6, David Moher7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Over 400 reporting guidelines are currently published, but the frequency of their use by authors to accurately and transparently report research remains unclear. This study examined citation counts of reporting guidelines and characteristics contributing to their citation impact. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Web of Science database was searched for citation counts of all reporting guidelines with a minimum citation age of 5 years. The total citation impact, mean citation impact and the factors contributing to 2- and 5-year citation rate were established.
RESULTS: The search identified 296 articles of reporting guidelines from 1995 to 2013. The mean citations per year was 32.4 (95% confidence interval, 22.3-42.4 citations). The factors associated with 2- and 5-year citation performance of reporting guidelines included the following: open access to the reporting guideline, field of the publishing journal (general vs. specialized medical journal), impact factor of the publishing journal, simultaneous publication in multiple journals, and a male first author.
CONCLUSION: The citation rate across reporting guidelines varied with journal impact factor, open access publication, field of the publishing journal, simultaneous publications, and a male first author. Gaps in citations highlight opportunities to increase visibility and encourage author use of reporting guidelines.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Citation analysis; Citation impact; Clinical trials; Quality of reporting; Reporting guidelines; Standardized reporting

Year:  2020        PMID: 32712175     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Alexander Schniedermann
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Six Sigma in Health Literature, What Matters?

Authors:  Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara; Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull; Angels Niñerola
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use.

Authors:  Patricia Logullo; Jennifer A de Beyer; Shona Kirtley; Caroline Struthers; Gary S Collins
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  How to properly use the PRISMA Statement.

Authors:  Rafael Sarkis-Onofre; Ferrán Catalá-López; Edoardo Aromataris; Craig Lockwood
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Reporting characteristics of journal infographics: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Giovanni E Ferreira; Mark R Elkins; Caitlin Jones; Mary O'Keeffe; Aidan G Cashin; Rosa E Becerra; Andrew R Gamble; Joshua R Zadro
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Trials of Palliative Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander Fabian; Justus Domschikowski; Anne Letsch; Claudia Schmalz; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Juergen Dunst; David Krug
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.