Literature DB >> 32712085

Characterization of the segmental transport mechanisms of DL-methionine hydroxy analogue along the intestinal tract of rainbow trout with an additional comparison to DL-methionine.

Van Pham Thi Ha To1, Marina Subramaniam1, Karthik Masagounder2, Matthew E Loewen3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the unknown transport mechanism of the extensively used monocarboxylate methionine feed supplement DL-methionine hydroxy analogue (DL-MHA) in rainbow trout intestine. Transport across the pyloric caeca (PC), midgut (MG), and hindgut (HG) regions were kinetically studied in Na+- and H+-dependent manners. Gene expression of monocarboxylate (MCTs) and sodium monocarboxylate transporters (SMCTs) were assessed. Results demonstrated that DL-MHA transport from 0.2-20 mM was Na+-dependent and obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with low affinity in PC & MG in apical/basal pH of 7.7/7.7. Changes in apical/basal pH (6.0/6.0, 6.0/7.7, and 7.7/8.7) had insignificant effects on kinetics. In contrast, HG flux kinetics were only obtained in pH 7.7/8.7 or in the presence of lactate with medium affinity. Additionally, DL-MHA transport from 0-150 μM demonstrated the presence of a Na+-dependent high-affinity transporter in PC & MG. Conclusively, two distinct carrier-mediated DL-MHA transport mechanisms along the trout gut were found: 1) in PC & MG: apical transport was regulated by Na+-requiring systems that possibly contained low- and high-affinity transporters, and basolateral transport was primarily achieved through a H+-independent transporter; 2) in HG: uptake was apically mediated by a Na+-dependent transporter with medium affinity, and basolateral exit was largely controlled by an H+-dependent transporter. Finally, two major methionine feed supplements, DL-MHA and DL-methionine (DL-Met) were compared to understand the differences in their bioefficacy. Flux rates of DL-MHA were only about 42.2-66.0% in PC and MG compared to DL-Met, suggesting intestinal transport of DL-MHA was lower than DL-Met.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DL-methionine; Methionine hydroxy analogue; Radioisotope flux; Transport kinetics; Trout intestine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32712085     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  3 in total

1.  How Different Dietary Methionine Sources Could Modulate the Hepatic Metabolism in Rainbow Trout?

Authors:  Chiara Ceccotti; Ilaria Biasato; Laura Gasco; Christian Caimi; Sara Bellezza Oddon; Simona Rimoldi; Fabio Brambilla; Genciana Terova
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Metabolic and nutritional responses of Nile tilapia juveniles to dietary methionine sources.

Authors:  Rita Teodósio; Sofia Engrola; Miguel Cabano; Rita Colen; Karthik Masagounder; Cláudia Aragão
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Are the Main Methionine Sources Equivalent? A Focus on DL-Methionine and DL-Methionine Hydroxy Analog Reveals Differences on Rainbow Trout Hepatic Cell Lines Functions.

Authors:  Karine Pinel; Cécile Heraud; Guillaume Morin; Karine Dias; Annaëlle Marcé; Linda Beauclair; Stéphanie Fontagné-Dicharry; Karthik Masagounder; Martina Klünemann; Iban Seiliez; Florian Beaumatin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.