Literature DB >> 32711106

Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Matthew R Cohn1, Kyle N Kunze1, Evan M Polce1, Michael Nemsick1, Grant E Garrigues1, Brian Forsythe1, Gregory P Nicholson1, Brian J Cole1, Nikhil N Verma2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, time-efficient patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) used to assess postoperative shoulder function. Clinically significant outcome values and ability to correlate with longer legacy PROM scores at 2 years following shoulder arthroplasty are unknown.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using SANE, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores that were collected at a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 153 patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. A distribution-based method was used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). An anchor-based method was used to determine substantial clinical benefit (SCB). The following anchor question was collected alongside the PROMs and graded on a 15-point Likert-type scale to establish the SCB: "Since your surgery, has there been any change in the pain in your shoulder?" Linear regression was used to assess correlations between PROMs.
RESULTS: SANE showed moderate correlation with ASES (R2 = 0.493) and Constant (R2 = 0.586) scores (P < .001). The MCID value was 14.9, and the SCB absolute value was 80.4 (area under the curve = 0.663) for SANE. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients undergoing RTSA were less likely to achieve SCB on all 3 outcome measures (P < .02).
CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes concurrent construct validity for SANE and suggests that it is a valid metric to assess the MCID and SCB at 2 years following anatomic TSA and RTSA. SANE demonstrated moderate correlations with ASES and Constant scores. Patients undergoing RTSA demonstrated a lower propensity to achieve SCB at 2 years postoperatively compared with anatomic TSA.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); minimal clinically important difference (MCID); patient-reported outcome instrument validation; substantial clinical benefit (SCB); total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32711106     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David A Kolin; Michael A Moverman; Nicholas R Pagani; Richard N Puzzitiello; Jeremy Dubin; Mariano E Menendez; Andrew Jawa; Jacob M Kirsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated with Patient-reported Outcome Measure Questionnaire Completion for an Electronic Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry?

Authors:  Uma Srikumaran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Measuring Patient Value after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Rodolphe Eurin; Axelle Alibert; Mehdi Bensouda; Hugo Bothorel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Why patients fail to achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Elliott W Cole; Samuel G Moulton; Brian C Werner; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  Rate of improvement in shoulder strength after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Jonathan O Wright; Ethan W Dean; Aimee M Struk; Joseph J King
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 6.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.