Literature DB >> 32710834

Community Assessment of the Predictability of Cancer Protein and Phosphoprotein Levels from Genomics and Transcriptomics.

Mi Yang1, Francesca Petralia2, Zhi Li3, Hongyang Li4, Weiping Ma2, Xiaoyu Song5, Sunkyu Kim6, Heewon Lee6, Han Yu7, Bora Lee8, Seohui Bae9, Eunji Heo10, Jan Kaczmarczyk11, Piotr Stępniak11, Michał Warchoł11, Thomas Yu12, Anna P Calinawan2, Paul C Boutros13, Samuel H Payne14, Boris Reva2, Emily Boja15, Henry Rodriguez15, Gustavo Stolovitzky16, Yuanfang Guan4, Jaewoo Kang6, Pei Wang2, David Fenyö17, Julio Saez-Rodriguez18.   

Abstract

Cancer is driven by genomic alterations, but the processes causing this disease are largely performed by proteins. However, proteins are harder and more expensive to measure than genes and transcripts. To catalyze developments of methods to infer protein levels from other omics measurements, we leveraged crowdsourcing via the NCI-CPTAC DREAM proteogenomic challenge. We asked for methods to predict protein and phosphorylation levels from genomic and transcriptomic data in cancer patients. The best performance was achieved by an ensemble of models, including as predictors transcript level of the corresponding genes, interaction between genes, conservation across tumor types, and phosphosite proximity for phosphorylation prediction. Proteins from metabolic pathways and complexes were the best and worst predicted, respectively. The performance of even the best-performing model was modest, suggesting that many proteins are strongly regulated through translational control and degradation. Our results set a reference for the limitations of computational inference in proteogenomics. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the Supplemental Information.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; crowdsourcing; genomics; machine learning; protein regulation; proteogenomics; proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32710834     DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  7 in total

1.  From dog days to human years.

Authors:  Dorothy Clyde
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Histone H2A variants: Diversifying chromatin to ensure genome integrity.

Authors:  Philipp Oberdoerffer; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 7.499

Review 3.  The Opportunity of Proteomics to Advance the Understanding of Intra- and Extracellular Regulation of Malignant Hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Maria Jassinskaja; Jenny Hansson
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Experimental reproducibility limits the correlation between mRNA and protein abundances in tumor proteomic profiles.

Authors:  Swathi Ramachandra Upadhya; Colm J Ryan
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  ACSNI: An unsupervised machine-learning tool for prediction of tissue-specific pathway components using gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Chinedu Anthony Anene; Faraz Khan; Findlay Bewicke-Copley; Eleni Maniati; Jun Wang
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2021-06-11

6.  Transcriptome features of striated muscle aging and predictability of protein level changes.

Authors:  Yu Han; Lauren Z Li; Nikhitha L Kastury; Cody T Thomas; Maggie P Y Lam; Edward Lau
Journal:  Mol Omics       Date:  2021-10-11

7.  Using Deep Learning to Extrapolate Protein Expression Measurements.

Authors:  Mitra Parissa Barzine; Karlis Freivalds; James C Wright; Mārtiņš Opmanis; Darta Rituma; Fatemeh Zamanzad Ghavidel; Andrew F Jarnuczak; Edgars Celms; Kārlis Čerāns; Inge Jonassen; Lelde Lace; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Jyoti Sharma Choudhary; Alvis Brazma; Juris Viksna
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.