Literature DB >> 32710336

Understanding psychophysiological interaction and its relations to beta series correlation.

Xin Di1,2, Zhiguo Zhang3,4, Bharat B Biswal5,6.   

Abstract

Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) was proposed 20 years ago for study of task modulated connectivity on functional MRI (fMRI) data. A few modifications have since been made, but there remain misunderstandings on the method, as well as on its relations to a similar method named beta series correlation (BSC). Here, we explain what PPI measures and its relations to BSC. We first clarify that the interpretation of a regressor in a general linear model depends on not only itself but also on how other effects are modeled. In terms of PPI, it always reflects differences in connectivity between conditions, when the physiological variable is included as a covariate. Secondly, when there are multiple conditions, we explain how PPI models calculated from direct contrast between conditions could generate identical results as contrasting separate PPIs of each condition (a.k.a. "generalized" PPI). Thirdly, we explicit the deconvolution process that is used for PPI calculation, and how is it related to the trial-by-trial modeling for BSC, and illustrate the relations between PPI and those based upon BSC. In particular, when context sensitive changes in effective connectivity are present, they manifest as changes in correlations of observed trial-by-trial activations or functional connectivity. Therefore, BSC and PPI can detect similar connectivity differences. Lastly, we report empirical analyses using PPI and BSC on fMRI data of an event-related stop signal task to illustrate our points.

Keywords:  Beta series; Deconvolution; Event-related design; Functional connectivity; Psychophysiological interaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 32710336     DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00304-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.978


  28 in total

1.  Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI.

Authors:  A M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Functional and effective connectivity: a review.

Authors:  Karl J Friston
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

3.  Toward discovery science of human brain function.

Authors:  Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Imperfect (de)convolution may introduce spurious psychophysiological interactions and how to avoid it.

Authors:  Xin Di; Richard C Reynolds; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Toward Task Connectomics: Examining Whole-Brain Task Modulated Connectivity in Different Task Domains.

Authors:  Xin Di; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Keith Bush; J Scott Steele
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Danielle S Bassett; Jonathan D Power; Todd S Braver; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xin Di; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Effect of trial-to-trial variability on optimal event-related fMRI design: Implications for Beta-series correlation and multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Hunar Abdulrahman; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Disambiguating brain functional connectivity.

Authors:  Eugene P Duff; Tamar Makin; Michiel Cottaar; Stephen M Smith; Mark W Woolrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dynamic and stationary brain connectivity during movie watching as revealed by functional MRI.

Authors:  Xin Di; Zhiguo Zhang; Ting Xu; Bharat B Biswal
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Offline tDCS modulates prefrontal-cortical-subcortical-cerebellar fear pathways in delayed fear extinction.

Authors:  Ana Ganho-Ávila; Raquel Guiomar; Daniela Valério; Óscar F Gonçalves; Jorge Almeida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Characterization of whole-brain task-modulated functional connectivity in response to nociceptive pain: A multisensory comparison study.

Authors:  Linling Li; Xin Di; Huijuan Zhang; Gan Huang; Li Zhang; Zhen Liang; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Age-related change in task-evoked amygdala-prefrontal circuitry: A multiverse approach with an accelerated longitudinal cohort aged 4-22 years.

Authors:  Paul Alexander Bloom; Michelle VanTieghem; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Dylan G Gee; Jessica Flannery; Christina Caldera; Bonnie Goff; Eva H Telzer; Kathryn L Humphreys; Dominic S Fareri; Mor Shapiro; Sameah Algharazi; Niall Bolger; Mariam Aly; Nim Tottenham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  Social closeness modulates brain dynamics during trust anticipation.

Authors:  Said Jiménez; Roberto E Mercadillo; Diego Angeles-Valdez; Juan J Sánchez-Sosa; Jairo Muñoz-Delgado; Eduardo A Garza-Villarreal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.