Literature DB >> 32710238

REMoDNaV: robust eye-movement classification for dynamic stimulation.

Asim H Dar1, Adina S Wagner2, Michael Hanke3,4.   

Abstract

Tracking of eye movements is an established measurement for many types of experimental paradigms. More complex and more prolonged visual stimuli have made algorithmic approaches to eye-movement event classification the most pragmatic option. A recent analysis revealed that many current algorithms are lackluster when it comes to data from viewing dynamic stimuli such as video sequences. Here we present an event classification algorithm-built on an existing velocity-based approach-that is suitable for both static and dynamic stimulation, and is capable of classifying saccades, post-saccadic oscillations, fixations, and smooth pursuit events. We validated classification performance and robustness on three public datasets: 1) manually annotated, trial-based gaze trajectories for viewing static images, moving dots, and short video sequences, 2) lab-quality gaze recordings for a feature-length movie, and 3) gaze recordings acquired under suboptimal lighting conditions inside the bore of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner for the same full-length movie. We found that the proposed algorithm performs on par or better compared to state-of-the-art alternatives for static stimulation. Moreover, it yields eye-movement events with biologically plausible characteristics on prolonged dynamic recordings. Lastly, algorithm performance is robust on data acquired under suboptimal conditions that exhibit a temporally varying noise level. These results indicate that the proposed algorithm is a robust tool with improved classification accuracy across a range of use cases. The algorithm is cross-platform compatible, implemented using the Python programming language, and readily available as free and open-source software from public sources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive classification algorithm; Adaptive threshold algorithm; Data preprocessing; Eye tracking; Glissade classification; Saccade classification algorithm; Statistical saccade analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32710238      PMCID: PMC7880959          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01428-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  20 in total

1.  Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Thomas Martinetz; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Erhardt Barth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Precision of sustained fixation in trained and untrained observers.

Authors:  Claudia Cherici; Xutao Kuang; Martina Poletti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; Marcus Johnson; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  One algorithm to rule them all? An evaluation and discussion of ten eye movement event-detection algorithms.

Authors:  Richard Andersson; Linnea Larsson; Kenneth Holmqvist; Martin Stridh; Marcus Nyström
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04

5.  A novel evaluation of two related and two independent algorithms for eye movement classification during reading.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Ioannis Rigas; Evgeny Abdulin; Oleg V Komogortsev
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

6.  Vertical eye position control in darkness: orbital position and body orientation interact to modulate drift velocity.

Authors:  H C Goltz; E L Irving; M J Steinbach; M Eizenman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Tibor Auer; Vince D Calhoun; R Cameron Craddock; Samir Das; Eugene P Duff; Guillaume Flandin; Satrajit S Ghosh; Tristan Glatard; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Daniel A Handwerker; Michael Hanke; David Keator; Xiangrui Li; Zachary Michael; Camille Maumet; B Nolan Nichols; Thomas E Nichols; John Pellman; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Ariel Rokem; Gunnar Schaefer; Vanessa Sochat; William Triplett; Jessica A Turner; Gaël Varoquaux; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  A studyforrest extension, simultaneous fMRI and eye gaze recordings during prolonged natural stimulation.

Authors:  Michael Hanke; Nico Adelhöfer; Daniel Kottke; Vittorio Iacovella; Ayan Sengupta; Falko R Kaule; Roland Nigbur; Alexander Q Waite; Florian Baumgartner; Jörg Stadler
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  Temporal dynamics of saccades explained by a self-paced process.

Authors:  Roy Amit; Dekel Abeles; Izhar Bar-Gad; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Peritraumatic dissociation revisited: associations with autonomic activation, facial movements, staring, and intrusion formation.

Authors:  Sarah K Danböck; Julina A Rattel; Laila K Franke; Michael Liedlgruber; Stephan F Miedl; Frank H Wilhelm
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2021-11-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.